Michael Mansour wrote:
Hi,
Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
It's all because
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
headerSARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0bReceived =~
This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Ned Slider wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:47 +:
Indeed. If your domain (jidanni.org) is in fact on a static IP then you
need to get your ISP to update the PTR record to reflect this.
Well, on closer look it appears that he's using a smarthost. So, there's
no need for another rDNS for
On 01/26/2010 05:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
Kai
Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
Warren
On 1/26/10 5:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ned Slider wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:47 +:
Indeed. If your domain (jidanni.org) is in fact on a static IP then you
need to get your ISP to update the PTR record to reflect this.
Well, on closer look it appears that he's using a
Warren Togami wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:15:23 -0500:
Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
Isn't that a given? The point was that I don't see a reason to ask here
about this. It's deprecated and it's not part of SA.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet
Michael Scheidell wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:56:04 -0500:
if you don't follow the RFC's, you have no reason to complain if people
who DO follow the RFC's block your email.
There is no RFC requiring back and forward resolution to match. I think
there's not even a requirement for an rDNS,
Russ,
I have not gotten this into the bugzilla, but ... as it appeas
a 3.3 release is imminent, I though I should mention seeing
this in my log files:
I am getting this:
Jan 20 18:17:40 vm049244181 spamd[14023]: spamd: Insecure dependency in
chown while running with -T switch at
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.0
Introduction
This is a major release, incorporating enhancements and bug fixes that have
accumulated in a year and a half of development since the 3.2.5 release.
Apart from some new or changed dependencies on perl modules, this
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:20:41 +
Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
I just received medspam with a new approach I've not seen before. Both
the subject and the plaintext body contain gibberish with the payload
(an advertising phrase and web URL) travelling as the personal name
part
On 26/01/2010 11:33 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.0
Introduction
This is a major release, incorporating enhancements and bug fixes that have
accumulated in a year and a half of development since the 3.2.5 release.
Apart from some new
That seems to be identical with the rc4 version that Justin offered for
last testing on Jan 21, right? I've been running it since then with no
problems.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for
RPM packages and distro-specific notes.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Warren Togami wrote:
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for RPM
packages and distro-specific notes.
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update
://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100126/?rule=/FROM_Wsrcpath=khop
Either it's too new or it's just not worthwhile to check for. We'll see.
Quoting john ffitch j...@codemist.co.uk:
After attempting to move to Sa 3.3.0
water:~ # /etc/cron.daily/sa-update
http: GET http://yerp.org/rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz request
failed: 404 Not Found: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN htmlhead title404 Not Found/title /headbody
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page, it's a
*one liner* !
Kai
--
Get your web
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:13:53 -0500, you wrote:
Quoting john ffitch j...@codemist.co.uk:
After attempting to move to Sa 3.3.0
water:~ # /etc/cron.daily/sa-update
http: GET http://yerp.org/rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz request
failed: 404 Not Found: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML
On 01/26/2010 03:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page,
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page, it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to import a bayes db, I get:
#sa-learn --import
bayes: perform_upgrade: Insecure dependency in open while running with
- -T switch at /usr/share/perl/5.8/File/Copy.pm line 133.
perl 5.8.8
- --
David Morton morto...@dgrmm.net
Morton
On 01/26/2010 06:16 PM, David Morton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to import a bayes db, I get:
#sa-learn --import
bayes: perform_upgrade: Insecure dependency in open while running with
- -T switch at /usr/share/perl/5.8/File/Copy.pm line 133.
perl 5.8.8
What
David,
Trying to import a bayes db, I get:
#sa-learn --import
bayes: perform_upgrade: Insecure dependency in open while running with
-T switch at /usr/share/perl/5.8/File/Copy.pm line 133.
perl 5.8.8
--- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm (revision 903517)
+++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Martinec wrote:
perl 5.8.8
--- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm (revision 903517)
+++ lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm (working copy)
@@ -1438,6 +1438,9 @@
# bayes directory
my $main = $self-{bayes}-{main};
Surely you jest, Sir.
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: Warren Togami wtog...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/January/26 03:15
On 01/26/2010 05:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
Kai
Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/January/26 03:57
Warren Togami wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:15:23 -0500:
Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
Isn't that a given? The point was that I don't see a reason to ask here
about this.
So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
HINET: Control of approx 8,476,149 IP addresses
http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/3/AS3462.htm
user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?
But that's what I did, as you see from
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
I just upgraded to 3.3.0 from 3.2.4 and get the following errors:
Jan 26 22:10:41.856 [32397] dbg: plugin: loading FuzzyOcr from
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm
Jan 26 22:10:42.038 [32397] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure
dependency in open while running with -T switch at
28 matches
Mail list logo
