Hi list-users,
I'm having issues with a SA setup's bayes database that some of you
hopefully can help with, it began last Monday.
The setup consists of 2 spam-eating servers running Amavis and one dedicated
server running MySQL and Bind. Bayes, AWL and Amavis are using MySQL with
three separate
John Hardin wrote:
To be serious, have you considered setting up a Linux VM that is
dedicated to hosting spamd?
If only it was that simple. SA is actually required as a component of a
bigger system which actually has NO business being near a Windows
server, but unfortunately our sys
I got an email this morning, quite clearly spam, but I thought I'd check
out the link to the Email Marketing Privacy Policy - here are a
couple of snippets:
company is a reputable company who specialise in ... [snip].
We adhere closely to the appropriate conditions of the Data Protection
Act
Hi All,
Apologies if this has already been asked. A hunt through Google didn't
help much nor did any digging around the SA site. That's not to say
it's not there, just that I can't find it :-/
I have Razor2 installed via CPAN, though without a version number.
When I try and install the new SA I
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:12:16 +, Nigel Frankcom
ni...@blue-canoe.com wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this has already been asked. A hunt through Google didn't
help much nor did any digging around the SA site. That's not to say
it's not there, just that I can't find it :-/
I have Razor2 installed
The Makefile.PL is the stock one from the downloaded ZIP archive. Anyway,
it's attached.
I tried switching the EOL chars, to no avail.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p27998442/Makefile.PL Makefile.PL
Daniel Lemke wrote:
Acutally, I'm quite sure this is a problem of your makefile. It may be
- corpus.defero corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
I was looking at a piece of irritating pill spam this morning
((http://pastebin.com/qzj83QKq)) and noticed this in the body, just
after a random excerpt from chapter 58 of 'The Awakening':
---34AD8EF316667417464496762D36F3502061F3
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:00 +, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
mimeheader __ANY_IMAGE_ATTACHContent-Type =~
/image\/(?:gif|jpe?g|png|bmp)/
mimeheader MIME_IMAGE_JPGContent-Type =~ /image\/jpg/
describe MIME_IMAGE_JPGContains wrong MIME type image\/jpg
score
weirdbeardmt wrote:
The Makefile.PL is the stock one from the downloaded ZIP archive. Anyway,
it's attached.
It's the generated Makefile that is needed ;)
The Makefile.PL is a perl script which builds a file called Makefile
(without extension).
Nmake tries to compile Makefile so your
Hah. sorry, too early, not thinking straight. Try again.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p27998910/Makefile Makefile
Daniel Lemke wrote:
It's the generated Makefile that is needed ;)
The Makefile.PL is a perl script which builds a file called Makefile
(without extension).
Nmake tries to
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:35 +, corpus.defero wrote:
Having some time to play I was interested to see a slight mismatch there
in the content type. Claims to be a bmp, but has a .jpg extension.
Feeling it was worthy of a couple of points (it scored 0 when it first
arrived) I tried to create
Hmm some strange things here...
What does perl -V:make tell you?
Should be something like make='nmake';
I found some references to MinGW, do you need it for any reason or would it
be possible to uninstall it?
--
View this message in context:
Dan - don't tell me how, but I think we're cooking on gas now.
First off - MinGW was installed to get rid of the error messages I was
seeing about not having a C compiler installed. Anyway, I uninstalled.
I then checked the make version as below - and it said
C:\perl...\dmake.exe. So I removed
weirdbeardmt wrote:
Dan - don't tell me how, but I think we're cooking on gas now.
First off - MinGW was installed to get rid of the error messages I was
seeing about not having a C compiler installed. Anyway, I uninstalled.
Nice to hear that ;)
You won't need a C compiler unless you
Daniel Lemke wrote:
Microsoft Virtual Studio (Express Edition is free of charge)
argh
I mean Visual Studio Express
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Installation-error-on-Windows-Server-2008---64-bit-tp27950951p28000599.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users
On man 22 mar 2010 13:15:36 CET, Ned Slider wrote
header__MY_FILTRAGE_FROM_93 From =~ /txxa\.px...@makk\.fi/
header__MY_FILTRAGE_TO_93 To =~ /\...@exxent\.net/
meta MY_FILTRAGE_93 (__MY_FILTRAGE_FROM_93 __MY_FILTRAGE_TO_93)
scoreMY_FILTRAGE_93 200
add
Daniel - thanks so much for your help. Now all working. Our e-marketing
platform is now correctly processing SA (hence no need for spamc).
Cheers.
Daniel Lemke wrote:
Nice to hear that ;)
You won't need a C compiler unless you want to build spamc.
If you want to, safest way to do is
Hi Charles,
/^[^a-z]{0,10}(http:\/\/|www\.)(\w+\.)+(com|net|org|biz|cn|ru)\/?[^
]{0,20}[^a-z]{0,10}$/msi
This allows for some amount (up to ten chars?) of text before and
after the URI if I'm reading that right, correct?
Nope. With the /ms flags ^ and $ at beginning and end match the
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:18 -0400, Alex wrote:
Hi Charles,
/^[^a-z]{0,10}(http:\/\/|www\.)(\w+\.)+(com|net|org|biz|cn|ru)\/?[^
]{0,20}[^a-z]{0,10}$/msi
This is what I have:
/^[^a-z]{0,10}(http:\/\/|www\.)(\w+\.)+(com|net|org|biz|cn|ru)\/?[^
]{0,20}[a-z]{0,10}$/msi
^
Hi;
We are noticing a number of phishing mails with a clone of one of our
webmail pages coming in. The interesting thing is the site they bounce
through. The site collects some user info such as OS, browser etc. It
appears an interesting way to obfuscate a url and collect data at the
same time.
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Alex wrote:
This is what I have:
/^[^a-z]{0,10}(http:\/\/|www\.)(\w+\.)+(com|net|org|biz|cn|ru)\/?[^
]{0,20}[a-z]{0,10}$/msi
My bad. I got an option wrong. Please remove the 'm' above.
I always get it backwards. According to 'man perlre' (the definitive
resource for SA
Hi all,
Should I not be using:
72_sare_redirect_post3_0_0_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net
It generates several dependency problems, including:
SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT'
SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT'
SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined
Last email had the wrong subject.
I have a few emails from internal servers that got flagged as SPAM. I added
trusted_networks 10.10.10.0/24 to my local.cf so that emails from those servers
aren't checked for SPAM.
I have the IDs for emails that are in the /var/virusmails directory. Is there
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 17:22 -0400, James R. Marcus wrote:
Last email had the wrong subject.
Has been rejected and won't show up on the list, FWIW, since you're not
(yet!) subscribed anyway.
I have a few emails from internal servers that got flagged as SPAM. I
added trusted_networks
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
- corpus.defero corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
I was looking at a piece of irritating pill spam this morning
((http://pastebin.com/qzj83QKq)) and noticed this in the body, just
after a random excerpt from chapter 58 of 'The Awakening':
Alex wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:34:11 -0400:
Should I not be using:
*sare*update_dostech_net
correct.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
James R. Marcus wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:22:04 -0400:
Last email had the wrong subject.
And this one is still incorrect as it is a reply to a thread.
Please use the new message button in your client. The reply button is
for, surprise, replies.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet
James,
I have a few emails from internal servers that got flagged as SPAM.
I added trusted_networks 10.10.10.0/24 to my local.cf so that emails from
those servers aren't checked for SPAM.
I have the IDs for emails that are in the /var/virusmails directory.
Is there a way I can reprocess
On 2010-03-23 12:14, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Is there any possibility that somebody who is more knowledgeable than I
am about images and Perl can extend it to handle BMP and SVG (as a
pre-emptive strike)?
Not exactly that, but I have written a non-image-specific SA plugin that
can check for
29 matches
Mail list logo
