I'm hoping that maybe someone here can help me figure out what I'm missing. I'm
trying to enable short circuiting on our configuration but it doesn't seem to
work. I've uncommented the short circuiting on BAYES_99 and restarted the
service but it doesn't seem to help.
Any recommendations?
Make sure the plugin is loaded. Uncomment a line that looks something
like this in your v*.pre files:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit
Kaleb Hosie wrote:
I'm hoping that maybe someone here can help me figure out what I'm missing.
I'm trying to enable short circuiting on
Make sure the plugin is loaded. Uncomment a line that looks
something like this in your v*.pre files:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit
I think that was my problem right there.
I found the loadplugin line in the v320.pre file. Thanks for your help
Jared.
Kaleb
Have an email, Subject: header exists, but is blank (not even a space
after the :) but the MISSING_SUBJECT rule does not trigger.
should it? I have seen a couple of these in the past. so far, all spam.
(running sa 3.3.1 with latest rules)
it triggers ,__HAS_SUBJECT,_ so, it won't trigger
I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is
fine. I just got a few false positives. One message got 10.9 points
(from earthlink, from an earthlink user). DKIM_FORGED is my own rule
and wrong, now fixed, for 2 points, but that's 8.9 points still. I
don't understand
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote:
I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is
fine. I just got a few false positives.
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:48 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote:
I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is
fine. I just got a few false positives.
DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE
It
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de writes:
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:48 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote:
I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points. Normally this is
fine. I just got a few false positives.
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:37 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de writes:
Translations of the rules? An Outlook user submitted directly to your MX
without using his own SMTP. The SMTP HELO looks bad. The mail has been
submitted from an IP, that's not supposed
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de writes:
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:37 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de writes:
Translations of the rules? An Outlook user submitted directly to your MX
without using his own SMTP. The SMTP HELO looks bad. The
Peter Alfredsen peter.alfred...@gmail.com writes:
[I don't remember if this address is subscribed, so CCing Greg directly]
On Tue, 04 May 2010 15:44:33 -0400
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I use spamassass-milter and reject at about 8 points.
[...]
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
That test has
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On man 03 maj 2010 07:51:01 CEST, ram wrote
this is my output
super
May 3 11:19:22.416 [621] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: use_auto_whitelist 1
remove that
12 matches
Mail list logo
