On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:06:23 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
No need to stretch the term large. That's a throughput of more than
1 mail per second -- 100k SMTP connections per day. And that is
without any local caching at all. With caching, the throughput would
be
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 00:19 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
The most important argument for me to keep it enabled by default is
simple. Small organizations and home users DO NOT have the knowledge
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 14:07 +0100, RW wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:06:23 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
No need to stretch the term large. That's a throughput of more than
1 mail per second -- 100k SMTP connections per day. And that is
without any local caching
On 2010-06-12 15:20, Andy Dills wrote:
300,000 queries per day...per server? per CIDR? What is the delimiter?
Because there is certainly no single IP generating 300,000 queries per
day.
That is probably your problem... use a central DNS resolver and your
query count will instantly decrease
I got another 1MB spam today.
I still don't want to kill my system by attempting to scan every large
mail that comes in.
Has there been any progress on an 'option' to scan only text portions of
mail past a certain size limit and/or scan only the first X bytes? The
former is preferable
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:32:05 -0400
Chris Conn cc...@abacom.com wrote:
In a followup to
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/151470;
Is it possible to set the priority on RBL rules to run after rules,
or not at all if shortcircuited?
RBL test are done in parallel, and
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-06-12 15:20, Andy Dills wrote:
300,000 queries per day...per server? per CIDR? What is the delimiter?
Because there is certainly no single IP generating 300,000 queries per day.
That is probably your problem... use a central DNS
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 10:09 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Because there is certainly no single IP generating 300,000 queries per
day.
That is probably your problem... use a central DNS resolver and your query
count will instantly decrease
Please do not hijack a thread. Please do not hit Reply, if you do not
intend to reply and contribute to that thread. Removing all quoted text
and changing the Subject does *not* make it a new thread or post.
(Hint: In-Reply-To and References headers.)
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 09:50 -0400, Charles
I am migrating to a new server with SpamAssassin. I have a well-known email
address which is a common spam target, and I want to set it up so that only
addresses on my whitelist are allowed, everything else is automatically
blacklisted. How do I set this up?
Thanks
Andrew
--
View this message in
On 06/12/2010 08:20 AM, andrewj wrote:
I am migrating to a new server with SpamAssassin. I have a well-known email
address which is a common spam target, and I want to set it up so that only
addresses on my whitelist are allowed, everything else is automatically
blacklisted. How do I set this
Evan Platt wrote:
Why are you accepting e-mail to that address in the first place? You
should have your MTA not accept the mail in the first place.
I want to accept email on that address from certain trusted users. I want to
block everything except the whitelist. can I do this?
Andrew
--
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, andrewj wrote:
I am migrating to a new server with SpamAssassin. I have a well-known
email address which is a common spam target, and I want to set it up so
that only addresses on my whitelist are allowed, everything else is
automatically blacklisted. How do I set this
On 6/12/10 10:59 AM, andrewj andr...@andrewj.com wrote:
I want to accept email on that address from certain trusted users. I want to
block everything except the whitelist. can I do this?
Do you want those users whitelisted globally, or just for that specific
address? If globally is fine, then
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:59 -0700, andrewj wrote:
Evan Platt wrote:
Why are you accepting e-mail to that address in the first place? You
should have your MTA not accept the mail in the first place.
I want to accept email on that address from certain trusted users. I want to
block
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
andrewj andr...@andrewj.com wrote:
I am migrating to a new server with SpamAssassin. I have a well-known
email address which is a common spam target, and I want to set it up
so that only addresses on my whitelist are allowed, everything else
is
On lør 12 jun 2010 17:59:51 CEST, andrewj wrote
I want to accept email on that address from certain trusted users. I want to
block everything except the whitelist. can I do this?
Andrew
whitelist_from fr...@example.net
blacklist_to yourownaddr...@example.com
when friend write to you scores
Hello Marc,
Am 2010-06-11 10:23:51, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Also - I'd like to make a list of host names where email from celll
phones comes from. Does anyone have a list of domain name or host
names where cell phone email is sent from?
One of the spamers domains are mymetropcs.com
Hello Andy Dills,
Am 2010-06-12 10:09:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
That's why I'm asking how the limits are designed. In the past I had
problems a certain other blacklist wanting money. We were using a central
resolver. Their thresholds were based on queries per IP, not network.
On 6/11/2010 8:00 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.06.10 10:42, Andy Dills wrote:
After recently upgrading to a new mail cluster with SA 3.3.1, we were
contacted (at every imaginable POC address) with a solicitation to
purchase access to utilize the Spamhaus blacklists, or they'll stop
On 6/12/2010 7:09 AM, Andy Dills wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-06-12 15:20, Andy Dills wrote:
300,000 queries per day...per server? per CIDR? What is the delimiter?
Because there is certainly no single IP generating 300,000 queries per day.
That is probably
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:30:08 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
I can't see as how the CEO of Spamhaus is making out like the
CEO of your typical public company, so knock it off.
There is nothing wrong with a for-profit organization running an
open source division and making sales
22 matches
Mail list logo
