Re: The "goo.gl" shortner is OUT OF CONTROL (+ invaluement's response)

2018-02-25 Thread David B Funk
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, LeandroCarlosRodrigues wrote: Amir Caspi wrote On that note -- regardless of what OTHER HW/SW solutions might do, since this is a SpamAssassin mailing list ... is there any facility to implement this in SA? That is, when calling the URIBL plugin, could it check both the

Re: Loading custom rules.

2018-02-25 Thread David Jones
On 02/25/2018 08:20 PM, Philip wrote: How do you load custom rules... is it as simple as dropping the .cf file in the spamassassin directory and restart? I'm looking at these: https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets Phil Yep. Usually /etc/mail/spamassassin and restart whatever

Loading custom rules.

2018-02-25 Thread Philip
How do you load custom rules... is it as simple as dropping the .cf file in the spamassassin directory and restart? I'm looking at these: https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets Phil

Re: Run expensive test last, and skip if meaningless

2018-02-25 Thread Bill Cole
On 25 Feb 2018, at 11:13 (-0500), Peter Thomassen wrote: Reminder: My question was not "how to run DNS efficiently" or "how does SpamAssassin run DNS queries", my question was "how can I influence the order of tests". The canonical answer is: by adjusting rule priority values and using the

Re: Run expensive test last, and skip if meaningless

2018-02-25 Thread Axb
On 02/25/2018 05:13 PM, Peter Thomassen wrote: Reminder: My question was not "how to run DNS efficiently" or "how does SpamAssassin run DNS queries", my question was "how can I influence the order of tests". You will have to hack the priorities in the plugins & rules. This is definitely not

Re: Run expensive test last, and skip if meaningless

2018-02-25 Thread RW
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:10:01 +0100 Peter Thomassen wrote: > Hi, > > While being very satisfied, I noticed that some DNS tests often cannot > be conducted because of rate limits, e.g. by URIBL. This is usually the result of not running a proper recursive local dns server. If you are using an

Re: Run expensive test last, and skip if meaningless

2018-02-25 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Harald, On 02/25/2018 05:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> 1.) If only tests that are known to have positive weight are postponed, >> no issue can occur. Furthermore, the situation I was referring to is >> where the score is way beyond the threshold; that is, it is a _lot_ over >> the threshold.

Re: Run expensive test last, and skip if meaningless

2018-02-25 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Harald, On 02/25/2018 04:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> While being very satisfied, I noticed that some DNS tests often cannot >> be conducted because of rate limits, e.g. by URIBL. At the same time, >> running these tests often will not change the outcome of other tests, if >> the score is

Run expensive test last, and skip if meaningless

2018-02-25 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi, While being very satisfied, I noticed that some DNS tests often cannot be conducted because of rate limits, e.g. by URIBL. At the same time, running these tests often will not change the outcome of other tests, if the score is already way beyond the threshold. One solution would be to

Re: The "goo.gl" shortner is OUT OF CONTROL (+ invaluement's response)

2018-02-25 Thread RW
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 05:25:06 -0700 (MST) LeandroCarlosRodrigues wrote: > Amir Caspi wrote > > On that note -- regardless of what OTHER HW/SW solutions might do, > > since this is a SpamAssassin mailing list ... is there any facility > > to implement this in SA? That is, when calling the URIBL

Re: The "goo.gl" shortner is OUT OF CONTROL (+ invaluement's response)

2018-02-25 Thread LeandroCarlosRodrigues
Amir Caspi wrote > On that note -- regardless of what OTHER HW/SW solutions might do, since > this is a SpamAssassin mailing list ... is there any facility to implement > this in SA? That is, when calling the URIBL plugin, could it check both > the shortened URL and the expanded URL (for known