-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:50:58 -0700
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 2/16/19 8:50 AM, David Niklas wrote:
> > My context was not that email servers were so unique to the internet
> > > that there is only one in the world, rather that they were
> > >
On 2/16/2019 12:50 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
>
> I also know for a fact that it would be EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, if not
> actually impossible, for the same type of attack to happen to Gmail.
> Between the infrastructure, number and type of backups, and
> monitoring, such an attack would be EXTREMELY
On 2/16/19 8:50 AM, David Niklas wrote:
My context was not that email servers were so unique to the internet
that there is only one in the world, rather that they were sufficiently
few that a failure of one, such as VFEmail, is a major problem for a
lot of people.
That is a decidedly
Insider threat detection is a whole different ball of wax from backup and
disaster recovery. However, there are numerous protocols to help for that
threat. Specifically Principle of Least Privilege (POLP) and Separation of
Duties. I consider this part and parcel of a Zero Trust network design.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 02:31:01 -0700
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 2/15/19 7:57 PM, David Niklas wrote:
> > If I host my own mail it does not effect your mail if my computer and
> > backups are destroyed.
> > If I host my mail and yours and my computer
how backups and off-site backups can help if the hacker is an insider? an
angry-sysadmin-employee for example? :-( with full-knowledge of the backup
system.
PedroDÂ
On 2/15/19 7:57 PM, David Niklas wrote:
If I host my own mail it does not effect your mail if my computer and
backups are destroyed.
If I host my mail and yours and my computer and backups are destroyed we
are both affected.
Thus there is no single point of failure.
I'm fairly certain that
