At 07:16 PM 6/12/2009, you wrote:
LuKreme,
I agree that one should be able to read the mail headers, but unless
you knew to look there, you wouldn't really ever care to. Especially
when wanting to unsubscribe. I don't think it has ever come across my
mind to look there. RFC's aside...a link
At 03:01 PM 6/18/2009, you wrote:
Hi. I'm relatively new to spamassassin and perl scripting, and I
must already be doing a few things wrong that I hoped the list could
help me to solve. I'm receiving the following output when running
spamassassin -D spam-test.txt 21|less'
[32692] warn:
At 10:45 AM 7/7/2009, you wrote:
I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set
on the highest (1).
What is 1?
I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The
terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it
This was just covered on the Spam-L list...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spam_blacklistaction=raw
and go to
# URL shorteners
Credit to Ron Guerin ...
At 09:51 AM 7/8/2009, you wrote:
Does anyone have a list of all domains that provide short url redirection?
As the headers of every message state:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
At 07:39 PM 7/9/2009, you wrote:
So - you attempted to unsubscribe. You didn't reply to the
confirmation e-mail that was sent. You weren't unsubscribed.
The process worked properly. Otherwise, anyone would be able to
subscribe or unsubscribe anyone else.
At 05:44 AM 7/10/2009, you wrote:
I tried that when I went on
Oh ok.. I'm going to go out on a limb here and blame Exchange. :)
At 07:40 AM 7/10/2009, you wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 06:56 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
So - you attempted to unsubscribe. You didn't reply to the
confirmation e-mail that was sent.
I did reply, but the ezlm software refused
At 04:03 PM 7/13/2009, you wrote:
Hi,
I've been running SA for about a month, everything is running great until:
I have configured our domain mail to forward messages to a gmail account.
I did a test sending an email from my gmail account to my domain mail; I
receive the message sent from my
At 04:45 PM 7/13/2009, you wrote:
Hope this is the log you wanted
http://www.nabble.com/file/p24471425/block.jpg
Who are you talking to? I only see two replies, myne and another, and
neither of us asked for a jpg image of a log.
If you're going to post something as simple as a log file,
At 11:14 PM 7/14/2009, you wrote:
No doubt this has been discussed before and apologies for any repetition, but
I can't find the answer in the archive.
I have set SA to reject all mail that isn't addressed to specific addresses,
No, SpamAssassin isn't rejecting the mail, something
At 11:22 AM 7/16/2009, you wrote:
I have a postfix/SA setup and I was wondering if anyone knew how to
COPY an email marked as spam instead of redirecting.
Not this:
/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REDIRECT spam...@example.com
As that's really a postfix question, not a SpamAssassin question, if
you
At 06:17 AM 7/23/2009, Rick Duval wrote:
unsubscribe
As is stated in every header:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
At 01:23 PM 7/28/2009, you wrote:
I've subscribed to the email list. This is, for my purposes, and IMHO,
much superior to any forum.
Why? Because I am subscribed to somewhere over 20 technical and
security lists (I stopped counting long ago - it could be more than 50
by now), and they all come
At 03:17 PM 7/28/2009, you wrote:
Funny that a request for forums would come from nabble... If nabble
users are any indication of what a forum would be like, I think it's
pretty obvious that posting quality would be crap.
Agreed 100%. I've told Nabble they have no permission to archve my
At 03:27 PM 8/7/2009, you wrote:
I sent a spam report to abuse and postmaster at webexmailer.com last
night. This morning I received this failure message for both abuse and
postmaster:
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the
message was forwarded more than the maximum
At 04:20 PM 8/12/2009, you wrote:
Maybe this will sound dumb but wouldn't it be perfectly
safe to blacklist example.com after all, that isn't a
domain your ever going to get mail from.
I could be wrong, but I'm guessing the example.com is the OP's munging.
At 02:56 AM 8/15/2009, you wrote:
How would I create a rule to match when a subject line begins /^Re:
/i but the message contains no References or In-Reply-To headers?
Just FYI, I'm on a number of lists where different people insist on
starting their subject with RE: ... YMMV. :)
At 07:43 PM 8/20/2009, you wrote:
Didn't we have an email a couple weeks ago talking about
inappropriate language on a public list and that it won't be tolerated?
I'd agree. Looking at his / her last 10 posts, each of them has at
least one swear in them. It's time for a ban, IMHO.
At 12:48 PM 8/24/2009, you wrote:
Lately I have been receiving quite a bit of spams that promote films
of the most indecent kind, involving persons of minor age. Examples
are here:
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam009.txt
By looking at those messages, I would expect them to score higher on
At 10:39 AM 8/27/2009, you wrote:
Hi all,
I thought I understood, but I'm still having trouble converting a
message in the quarantine back into a normal email message that I can
forward on to a recipient. Does anyone know how to do this?
Maybe I missed something, but SpamAssassin doesn't have
At 12:46 PM 8/27/2009, you wrote:
I'm sure I'm missing the obvious, but I can't seem to find a guide
to writing spamassassin rules on the spamassassin web page. I'd
like to write some custom rules, and some documentation would be
really handy. Anybody got that URL handy?
I'm guessing this
At 01:59 PM 9/15/2009, you wrote:
Please feel free to directly ping the list owners or use some other
channel to quickly trigger the PMC's attention if need be. Rather than
just posting yet another message to an already crowded thread. The
latter is exactly where your call for authority is much
At 04:10 PM 9/28/2009, you wrote:
Is it just me, or are others getting multiple copies of list posts
the last hour or so?
Not I Only see a few posts in the last day, and only one of each.
At 04:22 PM 9/28/2009, you wrote:
Not I Only see a few posts in the last day, and only one of each.
D'oh... forgot what day it is - I see more than a few posts from
today (19 dated todays date) , but still only one of each.
At 12:31 PM 9/29/2009, you wrote:
Nothing
As the headers for every message state...
list-unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
At 08:33 PM 9/29/2009, Danny wrote:
Nothing
As the headers of every message say...
list-unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
At 08:28 AM 9/30/2009, you wrote:
If you want to tell somebody how to unsubscribe, please do it off
list. Why doesn't the list block messages which contain a single
unsubscribe in the body or an empty body with unsubscribe in the
Subject line? I got bored of seeing these on the various lists
At 09:55 AM 9/30/2009, you wrote:
1.
Guys I am getting all my external domain emails tagged as SpamSpam
2.
3.
logs are attached.
4.
mail headers
Please make this post more readable. No HTML, Plain Text only, any
large attachments should be on Pastebin or such,
At 10:02 AM 9/30/2009, you wrote:
Guys
I am getting all my external domain emails tagged as SpamSpam
logs are attached.
mail headers
Once again, please don't post in HTML.
X-Spam-Status: No
So - what am I missing without wading through all the HTML?
At 11:36 AM 9/30/2009, you wrote:
unless, of course, someone happens to be writing a message with the
word unsubscribe in it, and DOESN'T want to unsubscribe to the list
let you think this is picking a nit I run a list for parents of
one of my kid's schools, the school department runs
It would help to explain what operating system you are using, at what
point you are stuck at the installation, what you've read and what
you've tried.
Did you look at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/StartUsing ?
At 04:26 PM 10/19/2009, amadis wrote:
I usually think of myself as pretty
At 04:42 PM 10/19/2009, you wrote:
Threats like that never help, and rarely yield any useful responses.
I love the people who make threats for free software.
If you don't fix this, I'm switching to competitor
For one, you get more bees with honey
Second, you're threatening to take away
At 03:58 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Domains cost about $10 a year. Static IP addresses depend on your ISP.
Some are cheap, some are not, and some won't do it at all. However,
you do not have to have a static IP. You can use a service like
DynDNS.org , which I think is about $20/year (they have
At 04:25 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Because many mail servers will not talk to you directly on a dynamic
IP and will not accept outbound mail from you on a dynamic IP. Also,
if your connection goes down, or you reboot your machine, having
someone acting as backup for you is useful.
(well, ok,
At 07:09 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
That's a reason for not accepting mail from that host, but why would
a server refuse to deliver there?
I'd have to agree there
Let's say you are yourdomain.com, I am mydomain.com . You send mail
to m...@mydomain.com . Your server looks up the mx for
What do you want to prevent from happening?
Mail that isn't specifically addressed To you not to get to you?
Look at the mail on this list:
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spam with my company domain
From: Jeremy Davila jdav...@languageworks.com
You realize, that would mean you
specifically
addressed to me .
Thanks for your response.
Evan Platt e...@espphotography.com
10/28/2009 05:34 PM
Please respond to
users@spamassassin.apache.org
To
users@spamassassin.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Spam with my company domain
What do you want to prevent from happening?
Mail that isn't
At 10:58 AM 11/12/2009, neroxyr wrote:
Hi, i've searching all over the net, yet I can't find a solution for the
problem I have. Let me explain it to you: Over the past months, our internal
mail server has encountered some unknown senders and we want to control them
by validating the users that
At 04:19 PM 11/12/2009, you wrote:
Do we know the OIP is using sendmail?
The OP has seem to just disappeared (nabble...) but from their post:
using SpamAssassin 3.2.3, milter-limit and sendmail
On 1/23/2010 11:56 AM, wolfgang wrote:
I sent an unsubscription request for the address in question to
users-ow...@spamassassin.apache.org.
Won't work, AFAIK. You need to reply to the unsub request to confirm it.
Otherwise, you would be able to unsubscribe anyone :)
If you don't get an answer here, a Qmail forum would be the next place to look.
Essentially you need to tell Qmail to call SpamAssassin. I run
postfix and use procmail, so can't tell you how on Qmail.
At 03:37 PM 9/20/2007, Waz wrote:
Hi -
Please bear with me as I am new to SA and server
Spamassassin will not forward. You need to do this with your MTA or
some other method.
At 07:53 AM 9/23/2007, mel goldberg wrote:
I'm new to the list, apologize in advance if I should be posting
this somewhere else.
I am attempting to SPAM filter and forward from my server to
another.
At 11:45 AM 9/25/2007, feral wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HOT_NASTY,PORN_16
autolearn=no version=3.1.9
So BAYES_00 brought the score down to negative .6 ? Methinks the BAYES is
not
even functional (database absent).
How do I enable network tests?
I'm pretty close to killfiling Nabble posters.
Nabble is to spamassassin as Google Groups is to usenet.
Seriously.
At 12:15 PM 9/25/2007, feral wrote:
Hmmm... deepest thread here w/ John Hardin somehow got
broken... nabble hiccup?
So I am posting response here:
It IS legitimate. I received one 07/14 referencing a e-mail on 07/12,
and yes, on 07/12, Paypal did e-mail me (I had asked about a broken
security key).
At 08:10 AM 9/28/2007, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Is there a new PayPal phish going about? This almost looks
legitimate, and I imagine it would
The message the OP Kenneth Porter sent? No, it wasn't a phish.
At 10:01 AM 9/30/2007, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Right, but PayPal write the ful name in the From: header too.
So, the message from the OP is definitivly a phish.
If you can get to it locally, but not remotely, it obviously isn't a
spamassassin issue. You made no mention of your setup. Since you
mentioned you can telnet localhost but not by the domain name, I'm
guessing you're behind a nat router? If that's the case, the problem
is when YOU behind the
Ah. Could be that or / too. :)
Not a lot of information to go on ...
At 09:52 PM 10/1/2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Evan Platt wrote:
If you can get to it locally, but not remotely, it obviously isn't
a spamassassin issue.
Actually, it sounds like he hasn't configured spamd to listen
According to babelfishm Mit freundlichen Grüßen means yours sincerely.
At 04:33 AM 10/12/2007, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I am amazed at the number of list users that unsubscribe from an anti
spam list and yet they fail to look at the headers of the mails they
receive
list-unsubscribe:
SpamAssassin won't / can't reject mail. You'd need to use procmail or
another similar method.
At 07:30 AM 10/19/2007, Yoda Woda wrote:
Here my scenario: I have postfix and spamassassin installed in a
gateway machine. Postfix accepts incoming messages, pipes them to
spamassassin for scoring,
At 05:09 AM 10/24/2007, cpayne wrote:
Hey Guys,
Got a problem, I been looking on the net no clear answer. But why
can't I use this have they change
Oct 24 08:02:45 magi spamd[2942]: config: failed to parse line,
skipping, in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: pyzor_add_header 1
Oct 24
At 10:16 AM 11/5/2007, Qnet .. wrote:
Hi,
the Spamcontrol do not accept the non-existent addresses the server?
or a have to Patch my existing Server with
http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtmlValidRcptTo.cdb
to that does just this?..
Than You, sorry for my bad english
Please
At 10:29 AM 11/5/2007, Qnet .. wrote:
sorry for 3 copies,
but spamcontrol is not spamassassin, spamcontrol is installed in my
Qmail server and i want to kwon if spamcontrol accept or not
non-existent addresses.
Thank You-
If spamcontrol is not spamassassin, why ask on a spamassassin
At 08:53 AM 11/6/2007, Marcin Praczko wrote:
It is possible add some text to Subject: For example [SPLIST] - to
make easier set up filter for emails?
Why? There's at least 6 in the headers:
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: mailto:[EMAIL
It's generally not a good idea to post spam to the list. If you need
to, put it on a website somewhere and place a link to it.
I ran one message through an older install of SA I have (non
production), 3.2.3, and it scored a 16.8:
ontent analysis details: (16.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts
At 08:05 AM 12/4/2007, Johnson, S wrote:
I just upgraded my
Spamassassin/postfix/amavisd/sqlgrey to the
current version and now have a few users from
MSN and Yahoo reporting an error similar to this:
554 5.6.0 Reject, is=26786-18 Bad_Header:
Duplicate header field: Message-ID
This
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SubjectRewrite
Warning: if you are running SA through amavisd or
qmail-scanner, those apps do their own message
rewriting and
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SpamAssassinSpamAssassin
cannot perform these rewrites.
At 09:04 PM 12/16/2007, the zak wrote:
Around the web what resources are there for users of RMAIL in EMACS
to deal with spamassassin headers?...
Google shows quite a few...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=rmail+emacs+spamassassinbtnG=Search
As the headers of every e-mail say:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:10 AM 12/18/2007, Yadwendra Verma wrote:
--
Yadwendra N. Verma
As the headers say: list-unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:22 PM 12/19/2007, Andrew Xiang wrote:
unsubscribe
At 01:44 PM 12/20/2007, jikke wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to SpamAssassin and have checked the web on spam rules. I just can't
seem to find the info I'm looking for. I want to create a rule where all
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a certain text like 'new message' is passed
through and all other mail
Read the thread that was just started on this - Stop tests when score is high
At 04:31 PM 12/22/2007, alex wrote:
hi,
is there a way to abort spamassassin once the score =5? I figured
this would be more optimized/efficient since spamassassin would
exit sooner.
At 08:15 PM 12/22/2007, justron wrote:
Hi
I have a VPS server with websitesource.com and the way their third party
solution providers have implmented sendmail ... Doesn't let me use
procmail...
procmail doesn't even work with their system.. sucks.. i did lot of search
and reading for procmail
At 08:20 AM 1/3/2008, John D. Hardin wrote:
You're going to have to reword that question, and provide more details
(like, what are you trying to do) before anyone will be able to
provide a helpful answer.
Best of luck. Looks like SG has asked about a dozen or so vague
questions, people have
At 12:32 PM 1/21/2008, Matsaki wrote:
New to spamassassin I now got it up and running on my server with ubuntu,
postfix, dovecot.
The only problem I have now is that i have created a mailaccount called
spamtrap but I can't manage to get the SPAM: classified email redirected
to the mailbox. So
At 06:22 PM 1/21/2008, Matsaki wrote:
I should be able to do this in spamassain as well as you can have training
etc. and sending SPAM: classified messages to a chosen mailbox, ie, spam.
Spamassassin has no such capability to send messages to a chosen mailbox.
That's what I was reading in
At 07:37 PM 1/21/2008, Rubin Bennett wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 19:22 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
Please reply to the list, not me.
True, but I've posted that post several times :) Didn't want to
duplicate my answer. I've sent *this* reply to the list however :)
Yep.. Maybe was worth
At 06:39 AM 2/19/2008, Rubin Bennett wrote:
If you want to post to this list, please subscribe like a regular user,
and do your research first before you post. Nabble, in a word, sucks.
It fences your posts as being from a subscribed address when in fact
it's not, and Nabble is not a forum at
At 06:16 AM 2/29/2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Some people might think you are over reacting
I can only imagine what it would be like trying to control outgoing
spam at Google.
The problem is Google does nothing.
I've reported dozens of google groups newsgroup spammers. They take
no
At 02:48 PM 2/29/2008, fLaMePr0oF wrote:
Greetings
I have utilised Spam Assasin for many years through a couple of hosting
accounts, however, over recent months I started getting a large volume of
emails that had semingly been passed through by Spam Assasin marked as not
spam but with no
Then unless there's some trick I don't know, you'll need to take up
any problems with SpamAssassin with the hosting company.
At 05:52 AM 3/3/2008, fLaMePr0oF wrote:
I can only access a basic spam assassin configuration screen through cPanelX,
(I can enable / disable SA, set the required
At 02:35 PM 3/10/2008, lukaszsl wrote:
I have the following problem: I run a server with Spamassassin and in front
of it I have another SPAM Filter that is allready prefiltering the incoming
emails.
Ok.. So far so good..
Now I want Spamassassin to put these prefiltered messages
automaticly
At 03:42 PM 3/10/2008, John Hardin wrote:
This just squeaked past my SA:
{snip}
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:38:53 -0400
from: greg martind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
subject: [SPAM] GOOD EMPLOYMENT OFFER
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authenticated:
Sure - a procmail recipe would work.
Or, provide an example header and an example entry from your local.cf
so maybe someone here can see if there's something incorrect.
At 09:39 AM 3/11/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I add users to whitelist in the local.cf file whitelist_from
[EMAIL
At 12:48 PM 3/19/2008, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
For those that don't run SA 3.2.3, you could test this rule:
uri CST_URI_BLOGSPOTm,http://\w+\.blogspot\.com\b,
describe CST_URI_BLOGSPOT blogspot.com throwaway URI
score CST_URI_BLOGSPOT 3.4
A few people disagree
No, SpamAssassin isn't blocking it. Something else is, but saying
SpamAssassin.
SpamAssassin doesn't have the capability to block messages.
At 01:58 PM 3/19/2008, dougp23 wrote:
I am seeing a strange problem. A woman at our company sends out a
newsletter, and several people said when they
On Thu, March 20, 2008 2:22 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
When I get a recall message from someone I routinely forward their
message back to them along with a note asking why they wanted to have a
copy if their message sent back to them just to drive home the point that
it doesn't work.
When I worked
egrossKintera wrote:
Another rule I found confusing was:
0.4 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML
versus
0.9 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
I cleaned up an email template for a client, so the code was more
streamlined and had less HTML (keeping the
SPF is a good start...
http://spf.pobox.com/
Do you actually have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account? If not, don't
accept mail for invalid e-mail addresses.
ahgu wrote:
somebody is using my email as the bounce-back return email.
How do I avoid the problem?
thanks
Andrew
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
What is the message box?
Do you ever intend to see [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the return path as a
valid message? If not, delete it via procmail or some other method.
ahgu wrote:
How do I create a rule for spamassasssin that it looks for the following
string in the message box and give it high
1.eml hits a 12.7 on my system:
--
--
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?201.233.220.168]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBLRBL:
As this really is a qmail question, if you don't get any answers here,
I'd suggesting posting to a qmail forum.
Marcin Praczko wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure that I am writing to correct list, but maybe you will
help me.
On one of my server qmail has been installed, SpamAssassin and
I could be wrong, but I believe for the learning process to be useful,
you also need to learn HAM.
(IIRC, an equal amount of each.)
Evan
NGSS wrote:
Hi,
I am losing confident in SA, the training process is pretty slow or it
doesn’t seem to be learning.
I am training SA with around 30-50
raulbe wrote:
Is there a way to just block email coming from .de domains?
Probably - in your MTA. Maybe a procmail recipe.
I have been individually adding those to my blacklist but I was wondering if
there was a catchall for just anything coming from .de
Your call. Bad idea, IMHO.
5.0 is generally considered a level you can consider something Spam at.
This scored a 5.9.
What's your Spam level set at?
phil89 wrote:
Hi
We receive some mails with EuroPharmacie
How could i avoid theses
SCORE is only 5.9
Regards
Philippe
Benny Pedersen wrote:
i would set scores required to 5.8
and begin train bayes
What's wrong with the default of 5?
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fredag, 20/6 2008, 20:49, Evan Platt wrote:
What's wrong with the default of 5?
nothing :)
if bayes was better trained
I guess you missed my point.. If the default of 5 was used, the message
would have been marked as spam. :)
Example headers?
Output of spamassassin --lint ?
mmedlin99 wrote:
Running SA version 3.2.4
amavisd-new version 2.2.1
Postfix version 2.5.2
Upgraded postfix from version 2.1.x to 2.5.2 just a few hours ago.
Now Spamassassin is giving everything a score of 0, even the obvious spam.
Worked
In postfix I have /etc/postfix/header_checks
/x.x.x.x/DROP
I'm sure sendmail has something similar?
thadcoco wrote:
Hi All,
My server CentOS 4, Sendmail, MailScanner (SA ClamAV) is being buried by
spoofed emails that are bounced back to my domain by the recipient's
servers. Virtually
Run a test message through spamassassin via command line. Save the output.
Reboot. Run same message through spamassassin via command line. Look at
the output. What's different?
Tobias Eichner wrote:
I face a strange issue and haven't found any solution so far...
When I need to reboot the
Spamassassin checks all mails passed to it. So you need to not pass any
mail to it you don't want scanned. I'd ask on a qmail list if you don't
get any suggestions here.
Marcin Praczko wrote:
Hi There,
I have a question about SA and legitimate mails.
Main mail server is receiving a lot of
At 11:43 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any
other way. There is nothing I can do about that.
Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the
emails that were sent before??
Do I have control over where they post to?
How
At 05:43 PM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
Top Posting is putting the textAnd fubars who complain
of your reply above the quoted text. excessively about top posting
Bottom posting (as I am doing) is get replies that are side
putting your reply below the original posted.
If no one's answered you, posting that you are waiting is likely to piss
people off to where you'll be ignored and / or put in peoples kill file,
especially not 5 hours after your initial post.
Have patience. No one here is 'paid' to answer you, so any help you get is
out of the goodness of
At 12:55 PM 7/18/2006, Andreas Walter wrote:
unsubscribe
end
Please check the headers of every spamassassin message:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know of no list where you send unscubscribe commands to the general
list address.
At 03:01 PM 7/21/2006, you wrote:
Hey guys, the Apache email system is hosed.
It has bounced two recent emails, one because it supposedly already had
list headers on it, which as it went out of here it did not. The other
had the system's spamassassin filter barfing on the direct output of
I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI,
then about 2 more lines.
I've put a sample at http://www.espphotography.com/spam.txt . But
that's about what they generally are. Very short, to the point so to speak.
Any rules that would help these?
Thanks.
Evan
At 10:40 AM 7/28/2006, you wrote:
Enable network tests. URIBL rules were basically invented for this
type of spam, and they tend to work quite well.
It looks like I'm not, but I'm not able to see how to - I use
spamassassin on a os/x box. I call spamc from procmail
spamc -s 512000
All
At 09:45 AM 8/1/2006, you wrote:
This message was stopped , and I'm not really sure what triggered the Diploma
Mill rule
The sender is legitimate (UNFPA.org) and I read the message it seems* ok
sorry to read about your tooth. i lost two upper fronts
due to bicycle accident some 27
At 10:23 AM 8/1/2006, you wrote:
Maybe, but with a sense of humour. And he (his MUA more likely) can
quote properly.
AOL.
Many a list I'm on have an AOLDiot. One of them didn't quote at all.
So in a thread with hundreds of replies, he'd chime in with Great
idea! I agree! and no one had any
1 - 100 of 414 matches
Mail list logo
