On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Michael Scheidell list-s...@secnap.com wrote:
or, as one posted suggested, use one single mysql database. its faster and
more stable.
Thanks every one, mysql is the way to go.
raj
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
As you mentioned, you'd need a custom script (not wildly complicated
for a good perl scripter, but beyond the bounds of someone with only
crude scripting skills.) as well as historical copies of each database
from
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Yet Another Ninja sa-l...@alexb.ch wrote:
I don't do any manual training, ever. SA's butler, autolearn, does it
for me.
bayes_auto_learn 1
In this case if a new spam comes and it does not score on any other
rules, Would't this be classified as a ham? Also I
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:05 AM, McDonald, Dan
dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com wrote:
I miss my Ohio Scientific C3. I had a Tektrinix 4027 terminal with more ram
than the computer.
Just wondering if any one here started off with BBC Micro? I had
couple of them in my school and they were truly
Hello,
I have 2 SA servers running for a single domain. Both were primed with
a set of 200 spam and ham messages are are now auto learning. After
about a day both have auto learned different numbers of ham and spam
mails. Is it possible to merge the bayes data every night and update
both servers
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Mike Cardwell
spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
That particular email was sent from a host in Nigeria connecting to a host
in Brazil. The Nigerian host is listed on Barracuda, the SBL and the XBL.
Is there a way to write a rule to tag mails which are
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Matt Garretson
ma...@assembly.state.ny.us wrote:
Do you use Bayes? Bogofilter (another bayesian filter) catches
those here. The one you posted scored 0.94 here and would have
been dropped.
I am not using bayes as of now, SA is site wide and so proper training
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Yet Another Ninja sa-l...@alexb.ch wrote:
even using site wide, autolearning will help your detection a LOT.
Don't underestimate it...
When running site wide, how do you get ham to train bayes? I can
manage spam by spam reporting and such, but getting ham
Hi,
Occasionally I receive mail from compromised web mails asking user
name and password from my users. The source IPs are usually clean (as
they are legitimate mail servers) and do not catch any ip based rules.
Usually one or two mail accounts are used to pump mails via web mail
after
Hi,
I am running SA in a hosted environment where SA is the MX and it
scans the mails and forwards to real mail server. We have report spam
facility where users report spam that went through SA. I am not using
bayes as of now but want to start using. To train bayes we have enough
spam (via user's
2009/1/30 Stefan Jakobs stefan.jak...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
After activating the rule I haven't seen any more FP. But that doesn't mean
much. Here are my stats from yesterday:
Rank Hits% Msgs % Spam% Ham Score Rule
-- --- -
Hi,
I am using SA from amavis-new, with postfix, in before-queue
configuration, with per user scores (provided by amavis) I also want
to implement per user bayes. But since SA takes only a single user
name, amavis-new is not able to implement per-user bayes.
Is it a good idea for SA to take
On 10/3/07, Rob Mangiafico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Picking up on the point of one Bayes DB in MySQL vs. individual ones for
each user, is it more effective in an ISP/host environment where you have
diverse users to have them all share one Bayes DB with autolearn, or is it
better if they each
On 9/18/07, infolistas listas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI users could anyone give me a help updating sa 3.1.7 - 3.2.3?
I'm not sure how I'll do that
I'm using ubuntu feisty, mailscanner, postfix, ldap, courier-imap
are there .deb for sa 3.2.3?
A Sub question, How does people in the list
Hi,
I manage 2 smtp servers, one for outgoing and uses smtp
authentication. Other incoming and scans mail using SA. Our users some
times send mails from dialup ips which are black listed, but the mails
always come via our authenticated smtp server.
Now when one of the customers send a mail to
Hi,
Does any one seeing increasing smtp concurrency for the past couple of
weeks? I run couple of (qmail/simscan/spamassassin) mail servers and
all experience the same problem. The spam does not increase, but this
is hogging my mail servers. Probably a new crop of spamming tools?
I am attaching
On 9/6/07, Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For qmail I added the file timeoutsmtpd in /var/qmail/control with a
value of 180 inside it (default is 7200) and it seems to have fixed the
problem without causing any new problems.
Thanks, I have changed timeoutsmtpd to 60 and the server is
On 4/23/07, Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. Dare I ask if some wants to summerize the Razor installation process?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RazorSiteWide
This works for me.
raj
On 3/22/07, Kris Deugau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone using SA in an ISP environment will run into this problem;
I agree here, I am using SA in an ISP and I have disabled Bayes. There
is no way I can get regular good supply of ham from our customers. No
one want's to forward their good mails
Hi,
for last 2 days I am getting lot's of spam with phone numbers rather
than website or email address to contact spammer. Unfortunately the
only rules that are matching for these spam are the rbl ones. Any one
else seeing this type of new spam? Any one with some rule ideas?
A sample is at
On 12/15/06, Dennis Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sample indicates you're running SpamAssassin-3.0.3. That's
*old*. Seriously consider upgrading to SpamAssassin-3.1.7. Then
run sa-update. Install the Botnet plugin. That should score on the
sample you've given. Also look at installing
Hi,
I got a new spam, and it just have a single number as content, and
worryingly the sender ip is not listed in any blacklists. Some spammer
trying to clean his address lists?
raj
--
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 27195 invoked from network); 5
Hi,
I am using the latest SARE stocks rules, and my spamassassin catches
most of the stock spam, but today I received a couple of spam peddling
stocks of CNHC. This spam is so perfect that it's getting negative
scores and not matchign any of the SARE rules. Any one with same
experience?
raj
23 matches
Mail list logo
