On 1/7/24 05:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email
comes into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would
normally just create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to
president@ get forwarded to the president's "real"
On 1/7/24 04:07, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Hellow Thomas,
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043539#88
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
The issue is not so much that GMail doesn't accept the email. It does,
since I have DKIM, DMARC, and SPF set up.
But it drops it into the spam
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 11:12:
I rely on DNSWL for the reputable MX.
if repution is 100% needed we all have to make local rescore on all
local mails, since repution is to be local, not external just
i consider dnswl level 0 to be possitive scored, and let the other
levels be
Marc skrev den 2024-01-19 09:34:
Hi Byung and Benny, are you having a nice MX party? :)
not needed yet, hehe
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 06:16:
Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
MXs and am continuing to operate them. Plus, the dedicated MXs run on
Google Cloud and RimuHosting.
it was to vierd for me to figure out how to get it working, and posible
in the
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:53 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
> H
> Tom Bartel writes:
>
> > Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user
> over a
> > 30-day time period. After the 10,000 requests, users must create a
> > MyValidity account to continue using this free service. Upon
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 08:34 +, Marc wrote:
> > > Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
> > >
> > > > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
> > >
> > > +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
> > >
> >
> > Hellow Benny,
> >
> > Actually i used Google MX for 10 years.
> > Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
> >
> > > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
> >
> > +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
> >
>
> Hellow Benny,
>
> Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
> MXs and am continuing to operate them.
Tom,
Tom Bartel writes:
> Hello SA Community,
>
> Following is an update on the changes at Validity regarding public query
> access for reputation data in DNS. We're finalizing the implementation in SA
> to enable this. As with Spamhaus DQS, we'll use the response code
> 127.255.255.255 to
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 17:17 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
>
> > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
>
> +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
>
Hellow Benny,
Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
MXs
H
Tom Bartel writes:
> Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user over a
> 30-day time period. After the 10,000 requests, users must create a
> MyValidity account to continue using this free service. Upon the creation
> of a MyValidity account, you will receive
Hello SA Community,
Following is an update on the changes at Validity regarding public query
access for reputation data in DNS. We're finalizing the implementation in
SA to enable this. As with Spamhaus DQS, we'll use the response code
127.255.255.255 to indicate excessive querying. Any
On 2024-01-16 at 18:33:23 UTC-0500 (Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:33:23 -0600)
Noel
is rumored to have said:
This - getting a .com domain to send mail - is really the only choice
you have.
I have not seen major problems with *.net or *.org domains getting
deliverability and some ccTLDs have
Thanks, Matus, but that does not work. I'm looking for something that
will show in the spam body or subject so I do not have to view the headers.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 05:06:11PM -0800, Cabel Sasser wrote:
> If you believe every new gTLD is garbage (and I get that!), why isn’t
> SpamAssassin automatically dinging, say, 1,200+ of them?
I have to second the advice to send email from a different domain.
It's just going to be the case
On 1/16/2024 4:49 PM, Cabel Sasser wrote:
HI Josh,
Thank you so much for your reply!
Most likely, SA specifically whitelisting legit domains in those poisonous TLDs
which are brought to our attention by, for instance, reports like yours. Less
likely but possible: seeing enough ham claiming
HI Josh,
Thank you so much for your reply!
> Most likely, SA specifically whitelisting legit domains in those poisonous
> TLDs which are brought to our attention by, for instance, reports like yours.
> Less likely but possible: seeing enough ham claiming to be from those TLDs in
> the
On 16.01.24 15:29, Linkcheck via users wrote:
When receiving a report in a spam the reported rules state reason and
score but it would be useful if, either on one of those rules or a
separate rule (or even in the Subject) there could be a report of the
final Received IP. Depending on the IP
When receiving a report in a spam the reported rules state reason and
score but it would be useful if, either on one of those rules or a
separate rule (or even in the Subject) there could be a report of the
final Received IP. Depending on the IP and its country of origin I
sometimes block the
* Michael Orlitzky:
> the result for me at least is that it's less work (i.e. less
> expensive) to just block every new gTLD and whitelist the few
> legitimate senders brave enough to live there.
My guess is that a significant number of mail service administrators use
the same approach. I
Hello Laurent,
I wanted to express my gratitude for sharing the tip on rawbody matching.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Jimmy
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:01 PM Laurent S. <
110ef9e3086d8405c2929e34be5b4...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> If you want to get that exact
Hi Jimmy,
If you want to get that exact version using rawbody, here's how it would
need to look like:
rawbody __PASSWORD_IN_QP /\bp\x{D0}\x{B0}ssword/i
As a trick to know what to use in such a case, I added this rule on my
debug/rule testing machine:
rawbody __ALLRAWBODY /.+/
tflags
--
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Login p=D0=B0ssword is s=D0=B5t to =D0=B5xpir=D0=B5
--
In the provided email snippet, I aim to match the text "p=D0=B0ssword"
using the following rule:
rawbody __PASSWORD_IN_QP /\bp=D0=B0ssword/i
Despite my
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 17:06 -0800, Cabel Sasser wrote:
>
> There are 1,239 gTLDs. The SpamAssassin source* blocks just *22* of them.
>
The official unofficial KAM ruleset blocks a few more, and there are
plenty of third-party URIBLs that essentially block gTLDs through SA,
albeit at one level
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Cabel Sasser wrote:
There are 1,239 gTLDs. The SpamAssassin source* blocks just *22* of them.
If you believe every new gTLD is garbage (and I get that!), why isn’t
SpamAssassin automatically dinging, say, 1,200+ of them?
Or put another way, why _these_ 22, and _only_
Hi MIchael!
I totally understand what you’re saying. I get it 100%. But your math doesn’t
quite add up for me.
There are 1,239 gTLDs. The SpamAssassin source* blocks just *22* of them.
If you believe every new gTLD is garbage (and I get that!), why isn’t
SpamAssassin automatically dinging,
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 15:58 -0800, Cabel Sasser wrote:
>
> Can anyone help me understand “the science”? And how these domains are chosen
> for such a heavy punishment?
What you're facing is essentially an economic problem. Everyone knows
dot-com, and to a lesser extent dot-net and dot-org. But
Hello friends!
We make a handheld game system called Playdate, and our site lives at
play.date. We find that our support email often doesn’t get delivered, making
for occasionally very angry customers.
In debugging this, we’re looking at spam score.
In SA, .date is one of the “bad domains”
In your message regarding Re: milter vs spamc dated 15/01/2024, Mike
Bostock said ...
> In your message regarding Re: milter vs spamc dated 15/01/2024, Benoit
> Panizzon said ...
> > Hi
> > > What are the pros and cons?
> > In my opinion, an email should either be received by a MTA and
> >
Hi,
Google Drive is being used to send links with malicious content. I know,
shocking. But should Google Drive be in the DKIM WL?
What more can be done to stop these? I have a few body filters, but these
are just links sent using Google to PDFs with malicious links.
https://pastebin.com/Qpj1drSa
In your message regarding Re: milter vs spamc dated 15/01/2024, Benoit
Panizzon said ...
> Hi
> > What are the pros and cons?
> In my opinion, an email should either be received by a MTA and
> delivered to the recipient, or rejected during the SMTP phase.
Thanks everyone for the good advice.
Hi
> The only con is that milter can't apply multiple SA settings when single
> mail has multiple destination users - it only has to use single setting for
> them.
We found a way around this, we use MIMEDefang as Milter and have
built database lookups in the config.
Usually, per user SA
On 14.01.24 22:22, Mike Bostock via users wrote:
I currently have users set up with spamc called in .procmailrc
However, I have quite a few aliases/redirects in sendmail virtusertable
who are not being protected by Spamassassin.
spamass-milter has setting for default user (-U username) that
Hi
> What are the pros and cons?
In my opinion, an email should either be received by a MTA and
delivered to the recipient, or rejected during the SMTP phase.
This eliminates:
* Emails 'disappearing' (false positives as example)
* Sending late bounces to fake sender when rejected by the LDA
Mike Bostock via users skrev den 2024-01-14 23:22:
I currently have users set up with spamc called in .procmailrc
virtual users is hard to support then
However, I have quite a few aliases/redirects in sendmail virtusertable
who are not being protected by Spamassassin.
good, move all system
I currently have users set up with spamc called in .procmailrc
However, I have quite a few aliases/redirects in sendmail virtusertable
who are not being protected by Spamassassin.
Would I be better using the milter?
What are the pros and cons?
How do I redirect spam to a mailbox if I use the
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
+1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
https://support.google.com/a/answer/140034?hl=en
i don't like it yet, missing dnssec and dane, tlsa, google is not
friendly there
if google wants my
This is not a good advice. Whoever filters SPF at SMTP time will
reject that
message. Gmail is not the only mail service available.
On 08.01.24 20:27, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
that's what I wanted to say - enough for someone, but not generally
>
> This is not a good advice. Whoever filters SPF at SMTP time will
> reject that
> message. Gmail is not the only mail service available.
Hellow Matus,
Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes
into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just
create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
forwarded to the president's "real" email address, say
>
> I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email
> comes
> into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally
> just
> create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
> forwarded to the president's "real" email address, say
>
Thomas Krichel wrote:
Hi gang,
my first post here.
I'm running version 4.0.0-8 on debian testing. This is for
Mailman. I have a script that creates a welcomelist for all my
Mailman members. I include it via a symlink.
# ls -l /etc/spamassassin/88_mailman_members.cf
lrwxrwxrwx
Bill Cole writes
> You probably only needed to restart spamd.
I think I did this every time I tested, and I tested many times
over.
--
Written by Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel on his 21399th day.
On 2024-01-05 at 13:53:00 UTC-0500 (Fri, 5 Jan 2024 18:53:00 +)
Thomas Krichel
is rumored to have said:
Hi gang,
my first post here.
I'm running version 4.0.0-8 on debian testing. This is for
Mailman. I have a script that creates a welcomelist for all my
Mailman members. I
Antony Stone writes
> Check the user which spamc runs
Thank you for this!
root@tagol~# ps axf | grep spam
789246 ?S 0:00 \_ spamd child
root@tagol~# ps axf | grep spam
662102 ?Ss 0:00 gpg-agent --homedir
/etc/spamassassin/sa-update-keys --use-standard-socket
On Friday 05 January 2024 at 19:53:00, Thomas Krichel wrote:
> I'm running version 4.0.0-8 on debian testing. This is for
> Mailman. I have a script that creates a welcomelist for all my
> Mailman members. I include it via a symlink.
> Clearly spamassassin follows the symlink and reads
Hi gang,
my first post here.
I'm running version 4.0.0-8 on debian testing. This is for
Mailman. I have a script that creates a welcomelist for all my
Mailman members. I include it via a symlink.
# ls -l /etc/spamassassin/88_mailman_members.cf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 Jan 5 15:52
On 04.01.24 22:57, Matija Nalis wrote:
bodyGIFT_CARD /gift card/i
score GIFT_CARD 1.5
metaFREEMAIL_GIFTCARDSGIFT_CARD && (FREEMAIL_FROM ||
!DKIM_VALID)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2024-01-05 09:06:
shouldn't that be !DKIM_VALID_AU ?
valid DKIM signature means
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2024-01-05 09:06:
On 04.01.24 22:57, Matija Nalis wrote:
bodyGIFT_CARD /gift card/i
score GIFT_CARD 1.5
metaFREEMAIL_GIFTCARDSGIFT_CARD && (FREEMAIL_FROM ||
!DKIM_VALID)
shouldn't that be !DKIM_VALID_AU ?
valid DKIM signature means
On 04.01.24 22:57, Matija Nalis wrote:
bodyGIFT_CARD /gift card/i
score GIFT_CARD 1.5
metaFREEMAIL_GIFTCARDSGIFT_CARD && (FREEMAIL_FROM || !DKIM_VALID)
shouldn't that be !DKIM_VALID_AU ?
valid DKIM signature means nothing by itself
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
On 2024-01-04 1:57 p.m., Matija Nalis wrote:
bodyGIFT_CARD /gift card/i
score GIFT_CARD 1.5
metaFREEMAIL_GIFTCARDSGIFT_CARD && (FREEMAIL_FROM || !DKIM_VALID)
score FREEMAIL_GIFTCARDS6.0
If you're not big on gift cards.
Also, you might want to enable and train Bayes...
On 1/4/2024 3:19 PM, Kirk Ismay wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has any good ideas to catch gift card scam
emails. This latest version came from Gmail, and has valid DKIM
records and the IPs are whitelisted.
Thanks,
Kirk
Here's the hits from SpamAssassin:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3
bodyGIFT_CARD /gift card/i
score GIFT_CARD 1.5
metaFREEMAIL_GIFTCARDSGIFT_CARD && (FREEMAIL_FROM || !DKIM_VALID)
score FREEMAIL_GIFTCARDS6.0
If you're not big on gift cards.
Also, you might want to enable and train Bayes...
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 01:19:28PM -0800,
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 01:24:02PM -0600, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
> On 1/2/24 17:51, Andy Smith wrote:
> > - Have your users collect their your-org email by some means other
> >than SMTP, such as running an IMAP server and having them view
> >both their gmail mailbox and
On 1/4/24 06:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.01.24 20:36, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Fair point. But I'm guessing that because it has two DKIM signatures,
it's not passing the DKIM check.
only one of those DKIM dignatures needs to pass, with the domain in From:
Yup, and it seems to be
On 1/4/24 06:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.01.24 19:30, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Thanks for the advice on SRS - I have set it up and it's mostly
working. At least GMail accepts the emails, although it seems to be
failing DKIM and DMARC tests. I'm digging into what, if anything, can
be
Thomas Cameron writes:
Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the forwarded email on GMail, I
see in the headers that both the original sending email server (call
it mail.somedomain.com) and the relay server (call it
mail.myassociation.org) put DKIM signatures in the message.
On 1/3/24
On 1/3/24 15:44, Bill Cole wrote:
Indeed: your solution is known as "SRS" (Sender Rewriting Scheme)
and it has multiple implementations. If you forward mail, you will
break SPF unless you fix the envelope sender so that it uses a
domain that permits the example.org server to send for it.
On 1/3/24 19:45, Greg Troxel wrote:
Thomas Cameron writes:
Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the forwarded email on GMail, I
see in the headers that both the original sending email server (call
it mail.somedomain.com) and the relay server (call it
mail.myassociation.org) put DKIM
Thomas Cameron writes:
> Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the forwarded email on GMail, I
> see in the headers that both the original sending email server (call
> it mail.somedomain.com) and the relay server (call it
> mail.myassociation.org) put DKIM signatures in the message.
That's
On 1/3/24 17:41, Greg Troxel wrote:
You are overlooking that DKIM from the original From: is the
responsibility of that domain and that if you do not modify the message
then it should still pass. Domains sending without DKIM are going to be
a mess.
Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the
On 1/3/24 15:44, Bill Cole wrote:
Indeed: your solution is known as "SRS" (Sender Rewriting Scheme) and it
has multiple implementations. If you forward mail, you will break SPF
unless you fix the envelope sender so that it uses a domain that
permits the example.org server to send for it.
On 1/3/24 18:16, Michael Grant wrote:
Here's what I have done in the past from my server to get around this
situation you are having:
1. In my .procmailrc file
:0c:
!exam...@gmail.com
This sends a copy (the c flag in first line) of the message to the
gmail account and leaves a copy in your
Here's what I have done in the past from my server to get around this
situation you are having:
1. In my .procmailrc file
:0c:
!exam...@gmail.com
This sends a copy (the c flag in first line) of the message to the
gmail account and leaves a copy in your inbox.
2. From your exam...@gmail.com
"Thomas Cameron via users" writes:
> I actually set up SPF, DMARC, and DKIM on the non-profit's email
> server. It works fine if I send email from the server.
>
> The rub is, I want all emails to presid...@example.org to be forwarded
> to presidents_real_addr...@gmail.com. Since the forward
Hello Thomas,
This might help too:
These failures are often due to SPFs that have a hard fail (meaning they end
with ‘-all’). When I dealt with this in the past, the original sending domain
was one where we could modify the SPF. So we had the email sender change “-all”
to “~all” and since that
On 2024-01-03 at 14:17:11 UTC-0500 (Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:17:11 -0600)
Thomas Cameron via users
is rumored to have said:
The rub is, I want all emails to presid...@example.org to be forwarded
to presidents_real_addr...@gmail.com. Since the forward happens at
mail.example.org, the "from" is from
On 1/2/24 17:51, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes into
the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just create an
alias in /etc/aliases
On 1/3/24 01:21, Jared Hall wrote:
On 1/2/2024 5:24 PM, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
The problem is, when I send email to presid...@myassociation.org,
gmail rejects the forwarded email because it appears to come from my
personal domain, not the mythical myassociation.org domain. DKIM,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 5:06 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> What?
>
> If the message came from .outlook.com hosts, it should be reported to
> ab...@outlook.com.
>
> You are right, it did come from an .outlook.com host. My mistake. I'm not
sure why they blocked the user, then.
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:11 PM Torpey List wrote:
I started forwarding full headers and text to "ab...@outlook.com" and
they blocked my IP.
On 02.01.24 16:49, Shawn Iverson wrote:
ab...@outlook.com is for reporting abuse on the freemail
Outlook/Hotmail/MSN platforms, not Microsoft tenants.
On 1/2/2024 5:24 PM, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
The problem is, when I send email to presid...@myassociation.org,
gmail rejects the forwarded email because it appears to come from my
personal domain, not the mythical myassociation.org domain. DKIM,
DMARC, and SPF all fail, which I
"Thomas Cameron via users" writes:
> I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes
> into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just
> create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
> forwarded to the president's "real" email
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
> I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes into
> the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just create an
> alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
Howdy, all -
This is not strictly SpamAssassin related, but y'all probably know where
to point me to make this work.
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes
into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just
create an alias in /etc/aliases
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:11 PM Torpey List wrote:
> I started forwarding full headers and text to "ab...@outlook.com" and
> they
> blocked my IP.
>
>
ab...@outlook.com is for reporting abuse on the freemail
Outlook/Hotmail/MSN platforms, not Microsoft tenants.
https://msrc.microsoft.com/report/
I started forwarding full headers and text to "ab...@outlook.com" and they
blocked my IP.
-Original Message-
From: David Jones via users
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 1:07 PM
To: Charles Sprickman
Cc: SA Mailing list
Subject: Re: MS-relayed spam
I would report this to Microsoft
On 2024-01-01 at 16:28:04 UTC-0500 (Mon, 1 Jan 2024 16:28:04 -0500)
Charles Sprickman
is rumored to have said:
Hi all,
Full headers are here as well: https://pastebin.com/wHNmnvtE
I'm not really following what's going on here - a few things confuse
me...
- the empty from envelope, which
On 01.01.24 16:28, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Full headers are here as well: https://pastebin.com/wHNmnvtE
neither indicate that the mail was relayes by microsoft.
Isn't this just backscatter, non-delivery notice on fake mail?
I'm not really following what's going on here - a few things
I would report this to Microsoft Abuse and setup local rules that add a point
or two something like this:
header BAD_O365_SENDER X-OriginatorOrg =~ /.*\.onmicrosoft\.com$/
With a threshold of 6.2, you might want to consider either lowering that a
little or bumping up some default scores for
Hi all,
Full headers are here as well: https://pastebin.com/wHNmnvtE
I'm not really following what's going on here - a few things confuse me...
- the empty from envelope, which I thought was more of a "bounce" thing
- that it does seem formatted like a bounce
- across multiple servers I'm
On Saturday 30 December 2023 at 11:54:33, FalconChristopher wrote:
> The comment by Michael Grant ?
Yes, the comment I quoted below. He is suggesting how you can deal with this
problematic user you want to "eliminate spam coming in from".
> On 12/30/2023 5:52 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
> > On
SpamAssassin cannot block or eliminate spam. It does not have the facilities to
do that. SA can only score potential spam.
Whatever method you used to glue SA into your mail path needs to parse the
score SA assigned in the returned mail, and do whatever routing it thinks is
appropriate.
We
The comment by Michael Grant ?
On 12/30/2023 5:52 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
On Saturday 30 December 2023 at 11:48:30, FalconChristopher wrote:
Hi, can I not ask how to set up Spam Assassin in this mailing group it
is a group for Spam Assassin.
That comment was a recommendation of how you can
On Saturday 30 December 2023 at 11:48:30, FalconChristopher wrote:
> Hi, can I not ask how to set up Spam Assassin in this mailing group it
> is a group for Spam Assassin.
That comment was a recommendation of how you can achieve what you want to.
> On 12/30/2023 4:30 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
>
Hi, can I not ask how to set up Spam Assassin in this mailing group it
is a group for Spam Assassin.
On 12/30/2023 4:30 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
Can you ban this user in whatever your equivalent of the access file
is so instead of putting the messages into a spam folder, you reject
messages
Can you ban this user in whatever your equivalent of the access file is so
instead of putting the messages into a spam folder, you reject messages from
that address at delivery time (SMTP)?
On 30 December 2023 04:08:17 CET, FalconChristopher
wrote:
>ⓘ *No issues found, please report it if
On 29.12.23 22:08, FalconChristopher wrote:
Anyone know how I can check and setup SpamAssassin so that I can
eliminate some spam from coming in from a email account ?
do you mean if one of your users started spamming out?
On 12/28/2023 2:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 27.12.23
You can create rule something like this
header BLOCK_EMAIL From:addr =~ /user\@domain\.com/
describe BLOCK_EMAIL Block email
scoreBLOCK_EMAIL5.00
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 10:08 AM FalconChristopher <
falconchristop...@bell.net> wrote:
> Anyone
Anyone know how I can check and setup SpamAssassin so that I can
eliminate some spam from coming in from a email account ?
On 12/28/2023 2:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 27.12.23 16:53, FalconChristopher wrote:
Hi, I want to setup Spam Assassin so that any email that Spam
Assassin
On 2023-12-29 at 08:41:23 UTC-0500 (Fri, 29 Dec 2023 08:41:23 -0500)
Alex
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
Barracuda recently announced they've identified a vulnerability in the
Spreadsheet::Excel library used by amavis in their appliances. I
didn't
realize they were still using amavis and open
Alex skrev den 2023-12-29 14:41:
Hi,
Barracuda recently announced they've identified a vulnerability in the
Spreadsheet::Excel library used by amavis in their appliances. I
didn't realize they were still using amavis and open source (and
presumably spamassassin?).
Hi,
Barracuda recently announced they've identified a vulnerability in the
Spreadsheet::Excel library used by amavis in their appliances. I didn't
realize they were still using amavis and open source (and presumably
spamassassin?).
https://www.barracuda.com/company/legal/esg-vulnerability
I
This is what I believe: the words need to be trimmed or separated, and
careful consideration is required to determine the language in order to
perform accurate cutoffs.
Jimmy
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 5:16 PM wrote:
> "ทุก" is not considered a word because it's part of the token
>
"ทุก" is not considered a word because it's part of the token
"ทุกวันพุธเล่นชนะรับเพิ่ม".
Words must be separated by spaces, otherwise we should skip the word "theme" just because
"the" is in english stopword list.
No idea if this makes sense for asian languages.
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 11:04,
The sample email and word list should contain at least these words.
ถูก
เลย
ทุก
Jimmy
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:47 PM wrote:
> I do not speak Thai but I cannot see any word in the sample email that
> should match that list.
> Which word do you think should match the regexp ?
> Giovanni
>
>
I do not speak Thai but I cannot see any word in the sample email that should
match that list.
Which word do you think should match the regexp ?
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 10:08, Jimmy wrote:
You can use this word list
You can use this word list
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stopwords-iso/stopwords-th/master/stopwords-th.txt
Jimmy
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 3:59 PM wrote:
> To create the stopwords regexp I used the script I shared in a previous
> email and a list of words one per line.
> Could you share
To create the stopwords regexp I used the script I shared in a previous email
and a list of words one per line.
Could you share the list you are using ?
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 09:22, Jimmy wrote:
I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
$ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
Dec 29
I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
$ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=en
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=th
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=ru
Dec 29 15:17:56.919
301 - 400 of 105300 matches
Mail list logo
