On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, LuKreme wrote:
Is it a custom webmail interface you wrote yourself?
The front end is custom, wrapping a standard client.
Any spammer who personally visited my site would be able to hack
it in seconds (with a stolen password, of course). But any existing
canned scripts
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
you belive that email sent from webmail is harder to spam scan then
submitted email from remote ?
No, my statement was that I believe spammers, like the rest of us, follow
the 20/80 rule, and hack the 80 percent of vulnerabilities that require
only
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
you belive that email sent from webmail is harder to spam scan then
submitted email from remote ?
No, my statement was that I believe spammers, like the rest of us,
follow the 20/80 rule, and hack the 80 percent of
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.08.09 11:07, Charles Gregory wrote:
IMNSHO You shouldn't. You should only allow *your* customers with pop
e-mail accounts on *your* servers to send mail.
1.
If more customers send spam from the same IP address without authentiaction,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I can't speak for others but at my main job (20K+ email accounts) it happens
about once every 2 month's or so. Some how the spammer gets a hold of
someone's password and either uses smtp-auth or webmail to send out spam.
Somehow is not that hard to
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.08.09 11:07, Charles Gregory wrote:
IMNSHO You shouldn't. You should only allow *your* customers with pop
e-mail accounts on *your* servers to send mail.
1.
If more customers send spam from the same IP address without authentiaction,
you
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I can't speak for others but at my main job (20K+ email accounts) it
happens about once every 2 month's or so. Some how the spammer gets a
hold of someone's password and either uses smtp-auth or webmail to
send out spam.
