guenther skrev:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Anyone else getting 404 errors from RDJ lately?
Yes, this topic came up just a few hours ago. Probably a dDOS attack.
Please disable all RDJ till further notice.
guenther
Now it's at least partly working, I
From: Jonathan Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sic the RIAA lawyers on them.
{^_^}
What? And give them a chance to show they may have some redeeming
quality? Not to those sharks, Joanne, ever.
I think that they'd encounter the spammers and a really bizarre good or
evil loop would form,
On Friday 08 June 2007, jdow wrote:
From: Jonathan Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sic the RIAA lawyers on them.
{^_^}
What? And give them a chance to show they may have some redeeming
quality? Not to those sharks, Joanne, ever.
I think that they'd encounter the spammers and a really bizarre
Anyone else getting 404 errors from RDJ lately?
The following rules had errors:
Tim Jackson's (et al) bogus virus warnings had an unknown error:
curl exit code: 7
curl: (7) couldn't connect to host
000
TripWire had an unknown error:
curl exit code: 7
curl: (7) couldn't connect to host
000
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Anyone else getting 404 errors from RDJ lately?
Yes, this topic came up just a few hours ago. Probably a dDOS attack.
Please disable all RDJ till further notice.
guenther
--
char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED];
main(){ char
guenther wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Anyone else getting 404 errors from RDJ lately?
Yes, this topic came up just a few hours ago. Probably a dDOS attack.
Please disable all RDJ till further notice.
guenther
I would imagine this is related to
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates?
guenther wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Anyone else getting
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates?
guenther wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring
Its true, scanners indicate klingon war vessels approaching our sector.
We've dropped out of warp due to overuse of the dilythium crystals.
Federation starships have been called in for assistance. Scottie has
given us more power, but is not sure she will hold together much
longer. All the
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Great, you owe me a new laptop. My current one now has coffee all over
it. :P
Nose-cups. ISAGN.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key:
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates?
guenther wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200
:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates?
guenther wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Anyone else getting
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Chris Santerre wrote:
I would imagine this is related to www.uribl.com and
surbl.org having
issues as well. Both are now pointing to 127.0.0.1 in what I would
assume was an attempt to stop the attack.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Good luck Chris. If you know who it is, maybe we should send Vinnie
Luigi
over to have a little talk with them?
Should we arm them with a RFC-2321 compatible RITA, and a confident
From: Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Chris Santerre wrote:
I would imagine this is related to www.uribl.com and
surbl.org having
issues as well. Both are now pointing to 127.0.0.1 in what I would
jdow wrote:
Should we arm them with a RFC-2321 compatible RITA, and a confident
demeanor?
Sic the RIAA lawyers on them.
Since Microsoft recently claimed ALL open-source or free applications
violated 250+ patents they own, maybe we can all sue M$ for BotNets???
Isn't that FREE software?
On Thursday 07 June 2007, jdow wrote:
From: Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Chris Santerre wrote:
I would imagine this is related to www.uribl.com and
surbl.org having
issues as well. Both are now
On Thursday 07 June 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Good luck Chris. If you know who it is, maybe we should send Vinnie
Luigi over to have a little talk with them?
Should we arm them with a
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Chris Santerre wrote:
I would imagine this is related to www.uribl.com and
surbl.org having
issues as well. Both are now pointing to 127.0.0.1 in what I
From: Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 07 June 2007, jdow wrote:
From: Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Chris Santerre wrote:
I would imagine this is related to www.uribl.com and
surbl.org
Sic the RIAA lawyers on them.
{^_^}
What? And give them a chance to show they may have some redeeming quality?
Not to those sharks, Joanne, ever.
I think that they'd encounter the spammers and a really bizarre good or
evil loop would form, causing a vortex that would slurp up
21 matches
Mail list logo
