Philip Prindeville a écrit :
I'm curious to know how the message could have been routed and delivered
without ever getting an Message-Id: stamped on it...
Sendmail, for instance, will always add a message-id if one isn't present,
regardless of whether the message is being submitted locally
mouss wrote:
Philip Prindeville a écrit :
I'm curious to know how the message could have been routed and delivered
without ever getting an Message-Id: stamped on it...
Sendmail, for instance, will always add a message-id if one isn't present,
regardless of whether the message is being
Hmmm Perhaps the protocol could had a mechanism added so that the
server could tell if it is talking to a peer (another MTA) or a client
(an MUA).
There is such a mechanism in RFC-2476, but I don't know how many MUAs
and MTAs support it.
Rosenbaum, Larry M. a écrit :
Hmmm Perhaps the protocol could had a mechanism added so that the
server could tell if it is talking to a peer (another MTA) or a client
(an MUA).
There is such a mechanism in RFC-2476, but I don't know how many MUAs
and MTAs support it.
all MTAs and
Graham Murray wrote:
Robert Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Is there a rule that says that any message without a message-id is SPAM ie.
one who's SCORE I can increase.
I've got a spammer sending messagegs without message-id's.
Just change the score for MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID.
Hi,Is there a rule that says that any message without a message-id is SPAM ie. one who's SCORE I can increase.I've got a spammer sending messagegs without message-id's.I have no problem with this being considered as SPAM. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Nate Crosswait Date: February 17, 2006
Robert Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Is there a rule that says that any message without a message-id is SPAM ie.
one who's SCORE I can increase.
I've got a spammer sending messagegs without message-id's.
Just change the score for MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID. This rule will be hit
when the
