Not as far as ok_locales and the respective CHARSET_FARAWAY rules are
concerned, IIRC. They have been written long ago to trigger on the
char-sets used. They don't detect the char-set based on the actual
payload.
So where does that leave us? With the need for an update or addition to
On 2010/05/25 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
Not as far as ok_locales and the respective CHARSET_FARAWAY rules are
concerned, IIRC. They have been written long ago to trigger on the
char-sets used. They don't detect the char-set based on
From: Jason Bertoch [mailto:ja...@i6ix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:34 PM
On 2010/05/25 7:02 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
Not as far as ok_locales and the respective CHARSET_FARAWAY rules are
concerned, IIRC. They have been
On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
I think the FARAWAY rules and other locale checks are dependent on
email using the old, pre-Unicode charset formatting.
Yesterday I had some Greek
On 2010/05/24 6:17 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
I think the FARAWAY rules and other locale checks are dependent on
email using the old, pre-Unicode charset
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
Without a RAW
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
Without
On 2010/05/25 10:48 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 12:51 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On 2010/05/25 10:48 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
On 05/26/2010 05:24 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Unfortunately, in this case, the fact that it isn't a proper, raw
message is not irrelevant. The ok_locales setting, which is part of your
original question, depends on the char-set used. Which is missing from
the sample. We only can assume
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
On 05/26/2010 05:24 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Unfortunately, in this case, the fact that it isn't a proper, raw
message is not irrelevant. The ok_locales setting, which is part of your
original question, depends on the char-set used.
A user reported the following FN to me which is written in an Arabic
character set. I have ok_locales en set, but I don't see any rules
hitting that appear language related. I also found the
normalize_charset option, but don't know if it will help or hurt my
ability to detect these
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN to me which is written in an Arabic
character set. I have ok_locales en set, but I don't see any rules hitting
that appear language related. I also found the normalize_charset option, but
don't know if it will help or
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Jason Bertoch wrote:
At a guess I would say the bulk of your score is attributed to the
URI in the body that has been flagged as being on the SURBL blocklist.
Beyond that, the issue seems to be that they have used a body 'type' of
text/html without actually using HTML.
On 2010/05/24 1:50 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Jason was speaking about a FN, not an FP. Am I missing something?
Yes, this was a FN.
These are the findings with one of my setup (SA 3.3.1, all locales allowed):
Content analysis details: (11.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:21:15 -0400
Jason Bertoch ja...@i6ix.com wrote:
I was really more interested in the language aspect, though. I
expected to see more rules match because of my ok_locales setting.
To be honest, I really don't know which rules look at that setting.
AFAIK the point of
On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
I think the FARAWAY rules and other locale checks are dependent on
email using the old, pre-Unicode charset formatting.
Yesterday I had some Greek
17 matches
Mail list logo
