Hi all,
we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti spam
community as soon as possible.
However, in order to do this we would need to deploy more DNS mirrors or we
risk providing a poor service due to the amount of DNS traffic we expect to
receive.
If you think you are
On 2/27/2010 5:35 PM, João Gouveia wrote:
Hi all,
we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti spam
community as soon as possible.
However, in order to do this we would need to deploy more DNS mirrors or we
risk providing a poor service due to the amount of DNS traffic
Hi Bill,
- Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
On 2/27/2010 5:35 PM, João Gouveia wrote:
Hi all,
we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti
spam community as soon as possible.
However, in order to do this we would need to deploy more DNS
mirrors or we
On 2/27/2010 6:42 PM, João Gouveia wrote:
Hi Bill,
- Bill Landryb...@inetmsg.com wrote:
On 2/27/2010 5:35 PM, João Gouveia wrote:
Hi all,
we are aiming to provide free usage of our DNSBL to the general anti
spam community as soon as possible.
However, in order
Hi Bill,
- Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
On 2/27/2010 6:42 PM, João Gouveia wrote:
I don't see where you have defined any of these entries that
you're
using in your meta rules:
RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L5
RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L4
RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L3
RCVD_IN_ANBREP_Z
Did you intend
