On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ham
for my tastes, and I never
enabled. The DB so far has 2 hams and 14 spams recorded. I wonder
how long it will take to see some good results from bayes and awl. Will
Spamassassin dump a message if it fits the spam characteristcs from bayes?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:44 -0700, Peter Pluta wrote:
I see, I still get 5-6 spams per day or so, but I have bayes and auto white
listing enabled. The DB so far has 2 hams and 14 spams recorded. I wonder
how long it will take to see some good results from bayes and awl.
Bayes is ignored until
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com
I just enabled bayes and awl a few days ago after getting a lot of useless
spam.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474.html#a11126699
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much ham for
my tastes,
John Rudd wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Er, no. zen OR sbl-xbl. I've found spamcop to hit far too much
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:51:50 +0200, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 16:54, Peter Pluta wrote:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
Martin Strand wrote:
It's fine for scoring against, but blocking is insanity!
I tested SpamCop for our info@ address at work (about 200 messages a
day) and didn't get a single FP for six months.
I use it for blocking on our mailserver now (about 2000 accounts) and
haven't received any
Quoting Peter Pluta [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can I
enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the lack
of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
SPAM in the dnstools spam
Server .116
The email attached has been identified by one of our team as legitimate but
unfortunately was incorrectly tagged as SPAM.
The email address has been whitelisted to ensure this will not happen again and
we are currently looking into the reasons why this happened.
No mail has been
Peter Pluta wrote:
Thanks, I got these.
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is contained within zen.spamhaus.org. Therefore you
are doing an extra,
Server .116
The email attached has been identified by one of our team as legitimate but
unfortunately was incorrectly tagged as SPAM.
The email address has been whitelisted to ensure this will not happen again and
we are currently looking into the reasons why this happened.
No mail has been
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474.html#a11046193
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Peter Pluta wrote:
I have a relatively stock install of amavisd-new and spamassassin. How can I
enable all the RBL checks. I think this is my main source of spam the lack
of RBL's. I checked an ip of a spam I recently got and it showed up as
SPAM in the dnstools spam database checker. I
can configure MS not to do it and let SA run them
(with the
difference than in MS you choose the RBL list, SA has a standard list).
--
René Berber
I have skip_rbl_checks 0 set in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I
Server .116
The email attached has been identified by one of our team as legitimate but
unfortunately was incorrectly tagged as SPAM.
The email address has been whitelisted to ensure this will not happen again and
we are currently looking into the reasons why this happened.
No mail has been
On 10-Jun-2007, at 00:19, Peter Pluta wrote:
I haven't been able to find
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google.
Towards the bottom of smtpd_recipient_restrictions (right before
'permit')
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's all you need to know
--
Like the moment
On 10-Jun-2007, at 15:21, LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Jun-2007, at 00:19, Peter Pluta wrote:
I haven't been able to find
any good guides on RBL's and spamassassin on Google.
Towards the bottom of smtpd_recipient_restrictions (right before
'permit')
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Do-I-Enable-RBLs-tf3896474.html#a11053138
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
19 matches
Mail list logo