Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my 'usual' amount of spam.
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my 'usual' amount of spam.
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my 'usual' amount of spam.
Spam's been down for me for the last week or two. I suspect is it shifting
patterns more than an actual change.
Loren
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 05:48:49 -0700, Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spam's been down for me for the last week or two. I suspect is it shifting
patterns more than an actual change.
Loren
AKA - I'm getting all your spam now? :-D
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my
: Anyone else seeing a large rise in spam?
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my 'usual
Botnets on the rise, apparently.
See http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=2495
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2007 12:39
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Anyone else seeing a large rise in spam?
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my 'usual' amount of spam. Though
long
before Bayes adapts?
Cheers,
tkb.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-else-seeing-a-large-rise-in-spam--tf3458536.html#a9657348
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is anyone else seeing the below when sending a message to the list?
Yes. Discussed a week or so ago when it seemingly first started happening.
Loren
Loren Wilton wrote:
Is anyone else seeing the below when sending a message to the list?
Yes. Discussed a week or so ago when it seemingly first started
happening.
Loren
Yes. Under the subject [Fwd: Your email message was blocked]
but they didn't talk about anything other than why
This is due to automatic rules that have determined that the
message is probably Porn related junk email. If you believe the message was
business related please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request
that the message be released. If no contact is made within 4
days the message will
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
I personally vote for the removal of this user until they learn to
disable their content filter, or at least make it do the right
thing and not respond to messages with Precedence: bulk or list.
+1
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
Yes. It's annoying as crap because it ignores the Return-Path and
contacts the From:.
What's even worse is one of their rules triggered on the error message
so when I forwarded it, as requested, it got kicked back..
Chris wrote:
Is anyone else seeing the below when sending a message
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 9:50 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
Yes. It's annoying as crap because it ignores the Return-Path and
contacts the From:.
What's even worse is one of their rules triggered on the error message
so when I forwarded it, as requested, it got kicked back..
Chris wrote:
Yep,
Is anyone else seeing this sort of spam? It consists of a short message
and always has a URL in it that ends with the string '/sk/'. The URL
points to a web site advertising human growth hormone and testosterone
treatment.
These spams aren't firing on enough rules to be tagged by SpamAssassin
17 matches
Mail list logo
