At 03:21 PM 9/11/2005, Justin Mason wrote:
The choice of anti-bayes-filler below is unfortunate on so many levels
nasty. but unsurprising -- I've always thought that news/current events
would make the best bayes poison -- certainly beats 19th century
prose
J, I think the unfortunate
Thomas Cameron wrote:
I dunno, I thought the mention of the Army Corps of Engineers and
pumping in the same message as a lose weight message was pretty funny
as well...
Hmm.. Mil-spec liposuction? Ouch.
The choice of anti-bayes-filler below is unfortunate on so many levels
... and on top of that, they spammed our abuse address.
(Links to spammer site deleted.)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:45:40 +0500
From: Nadia Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: abuse
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bart Schaefer writes:
The choice of anti-bayes-filler below is unfortunate on so many levels
nasty. but unsurprising -- I've always thought that news/current events
would make the best bayes poison -- certainly beats 19th century
prose
...
At 03:21 PM 9/11/2005, Justin Mason wrote:
The choice of anti-bayes-filler below is unfortunate on so many levels
nasty. but unsurprising -- I've always thought that news/current events
would make the best bayes poison -- certainly beats 19th century
prose
J, I think the unfortunate
