Re: Sought dedicated AND stock channel

2010-08-12 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them. That means, stale meta rules in stock will override the fresh meta rules, effectively discarding all

Re: Sought dedicated AND stock channel

2010-08-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them. That means, stale meta rules in stock will override the fresh meta rules, effectively discarding

Re: Sought dedicated AND stock channel

2010-08-12 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 8/12/2010 11:41 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 8/11/2010 6:15 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: The problem is, that not only the sub-rules change, but with them the actually scored meta rules, combining these sub-rules by OR-ing them. That means, stale meta rules in stock will

Sought dedicated AND stock channel (was: Re: JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD)

2010-08-11 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:30:40 -0400 Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote: On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote: The current situation is: automatic rule updates are only generated when the corpa of recent messages used in the nightly masscheck is sufficiently large (150k+ of