Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-18 Thread Gnanam
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Integration-tp28903365p28922585.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Gnanam
headers, etc., can you share me relevant documentation links on the same? BTW, what does PGP mean that I found from your signature? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Integration-tp28903365p28910744.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Gnanam
/SpamAssassin-Integration-tp28903365p28911147.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Frank Heydlauf
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:17:10AM -0700, Gnanam wrote: Can SpamAssassin be used to test spam score of .html, .txt file extension types, that is email body/content part of the email message? that will not give you the output you'd expect. Just create a complete mail with header and

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Gnanam
that is compliant with SA? Relevant links, documentation, etc. for the same are appreciated? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Integration-tp28903365p28913486.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote: that will not give you the output you'd expect. Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc and feed this into SA. On 17.06.10 05:02, Gnanam wrote: How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any standard/rule for

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Matt Kettler
On 6/17/2010 8:02 AM, Gnanam wrote: Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote: that will not give you the output you'd expect. Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc and feed this into SA. How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any standard/rule

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 05:02 -0700, Gnanam wrote: Frank Heydlauf-2 wrote: that will not give you the output you'd expect. Just create a complete mail with header and mime-encoded multipart etc and feed this into SA. How do I create a complete mail with header, etc.? Is there any

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread SM
At 05:18 17-06-10, Matt Kettler wrote: The best docs would be the RFC standards: RFC 2822 Internet Message Format RFC 822 (obsoleted by above, but sometimes useful for understanding the history of the format, making intent clearer.) RFC 2822 obsoleted by RFC 5322. Regards, -sm

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-17 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 17.6.2010 9:19, Gnanam wrote: BTW, what does PGP mean that I found from your signature? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail client, please contact me. O, it is excellent To have

SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-16 Thread Gnanam
, etc. but rather it is a regular/normal web-based form with HTML editor. How do I integrate SpamAssassin for my Use Case explained above? Relevant documentation links on the same are appreciated. Regards, Gnanam -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Integration

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-16 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 16.6.2010 17:18, Gnanam wrote: Hi, I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam score of the email content that our application User's wish to send in mail composing page itself - even before sending. When I say mail composing page here, it is not an email

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-16 Thread Charles Gregory
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Gnanam wrote: I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam score of the email content... If this is your own custom web software, then it is as simple as adding a call to spamassassin (or spamc) in the same area of the script that validates

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-16 Thread Frank Heydlauf
Hi, On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 07:18:57AM -0700, Gnanam wrote: I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam score of the email content that our application User's wish to send in mail composing page itself - even before sending. When I say mail composing page

Re: SpamAssassin Integration

2010-06-16 Thread Gnanam
of their email message, that is their email content part. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Integration-tp28903365p28910672.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-07 Thread James Keating
Gary W. Smith wrote: In master.cf we have: smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=filter: filterunix - n n - - pipe flags=Rq user=filter argv=/etc/mail/spamassassin/filter.sh -f ${sender} -- ${recipient} filter.sh:

Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-07 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Freitag, 7. April 2006 14:09 James Keating wrote: Any other thoughts? I just found this: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratePosfixViaSpampd mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660/4156531

Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-07 Thread James Keating
Michael Monnerie wrote: On Freitag, 7. April 2006 14:09 James Keating wrote: Any other thoughts? I just found this: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratePosfixViaSpampd mfg zmi I have already tried this script and it was very close to what I was wanting, but it does not connect to

Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-07 Thread James Keating
Michael Monnerie wrote: I just found this: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratePosfixViaSpampd mfg zmi I have already tried this script and it was very close to what I was wanting, but it does not connect to spamd in any manner. It actually uses the perl libraries to interact

Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-07 Thread Gary D. Margiotta
Attached is what I use, found it on a webpage about installing SA when I was going through it. Customized slightly for my local usernames and ways of doing things. When spamd dies, all mail continues to come through, it just doesn't get analyzed by SA until spamd gets restarted. Here's my

RE: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-06 Thread James Keating
Quoting Gary W. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]: James, Timeout is 600 seconds. If spamd doesn't have respond in that amount of time them there is something else is wrong. I suppose that if all of the spamd threads are clogged then you might find a waiting list but 600 seconds is a lifetime. That

Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-05 Thread James Keating
Dear Sirs/Madams, I have been attempting to properly integrate SpamAssassin into Postfix and have not found the solution that I am looking for. Currently I have Spamassassin running as a daemon (spamd, version 3.1.0a-2) which uses MySQL to store Bayes, AWL, user preferences and stats.

Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-05 Thread mostlyharmless
James Keating wrote: Dear Sirs/Madams, I have been attempting to properly integrate SpamAssassin into Postfix and have not found the solution that I am looking for. Currently I have Spamassassin running as a daemon (spamd, version 3.1.0a-2) which uses MySQL to store Bayes, AWL, user

Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-05 Thread James Keating
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this a high volume mail server? Yes it is rather high volume server, I don't have any estimates on # of messages. Something like this should do the trick (this is off the cuff, and just a reference, you will have to modify for your exact setup). master.cf

RE: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration

2006-04-05 Thread Gary W. Smith
Subject: Re: Postfix/SpamAssassin Integration [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this a high volume mail server? Yes it is rather high volume server, I don't have any estimates on # of messages. Something like this should do the trick (this is off the cuff, and just a reference, you will have