-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 2:59 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamhaus Whitelist
found out that below is a violation of the specs, and is NOT recommended
to be used.
I would assume that the specs detail tighter
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
--
Let me tell you something about regrowing your dead wife Lucy, Harry.
It's probably illegal, potentially dangerous, and definitely crazy.
-Harry nods-
Vincent
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
header SPAMHAUS_SWL eval:check_rbl('SPAMHAUS_SWL', 'swl.spamhaus.org.')
describe
On 11/6/2010 12:19 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
header SPAMHAUS_SWL
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be using Vouch-by-reference unless
either DKIM
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be
--On Saturday, November 6, 2010 2:40 AM -0400 Dan Mahoney, System Admin
d...@prime.gushi.org wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
Has a paying customer got an answer from Spamhaus about an
- Joseph Brennan bren...@columbia.edu wrote:
--On Saturday, November 6, 2010 2:40 AM -0400 Dan Mahoney, System
Admin
d...@prime.gushi.org wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new
spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
On 11/06, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new
spamhaus whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
Thanks for mentioning it. This is based on the DNSWL rules and linted and
loaded, but only seconds ago, so not tested, please
On 11/6/2010 12:50 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landryb...@inetmsg.com wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not
On 11/6/10 3:19 AM, Bill Landry wrote:
On 11/5/2010 11:40 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
You could try something like:
don't forget the tflag 'noautolearn' since
Hi
if you use sendmail you can add
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]OK
to your access file in /etc/mail
dont forget to
/usr/sbin/makemap hash /etc/mail/access /etc/mail/access
Matthias
Bill Landry schrieb:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote the following on 3/27/2007 7:36 AM -0800:
Hi everyone,
I
Hi everyone,
I have a contact from Africa whom I put on the whitelist because everytime he
would send mail the scores went through the roof-
Recently he started getting this:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [41.204.40.26] blocked using
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org;
Jean-Paul Natola wrote the following on 3/27/2007 7:36 AM -0800:
Hi everyone,
I have a contact from Africa whom I put on the whitelist because everytime he
would send mail the scores went through the roof-
Recently he started getting this:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Recently he started getting this:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [41.204.40.26]
blocked using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org;
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL52368
What fix can I do to enable him to send to us again
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, maillist wrote:
maillist wrote:
An easy way would be to:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Others here will say that is not a good idea, because of how easy it is to
spoof. But to me, saying anything about spoofs when referring to Africans,
can be harmful to your
16 matches
Mail list logo
