Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam
using SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
required_score is set to high value of 9 to avoid false postives. Mail
which is detected as spam is being deleted.
All SA filtering is
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam using SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
required_score is set to high value of 9 to avoid false postives. Mail which
is detected as spam
Am 26.06.2008 um 18:26 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam
using SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
required_score is set to high value of 9 to
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 18:26 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my spam using
SA:
All mails are piped through spamc. (emails for my family and me).
Am 26.06.2008 um 19:31 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 18:26 schrieb John Hardin:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I use (honestly: I plan) the following procedure to filter my
spam using SA:
All mails are piped
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Florian Lindner wrote:
Generally speaking, it's a bad idea to fiddle with the threshold as all the
base rulesets are scored by the masscheck process with the assumption that
5 is spammy.
Sorry, I don't understand this. What is difference between changing the
threshold
On Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2008 Florian Lindner wrote:
Can I use two different bayes DBs? One for my family without training
(just the auto train functions) and one for me that is trained?
You don't want that, really. If you use a trained bayes, it helps all.
You do not have to have all spam
