On 11/30/2009 03:15 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 27.11.09 14:04, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
for the ruleset:
header __L_UNDISCLOSED1 To:raw =~ /undisclosed-recipients: ;/
just FYI, sendmail can be configured to do different things when To: is
missing -
On 27.11.09 14:04, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
for the ruleset:
header __L_UNDISCLOSED1 To:raw =~ /undisclosed-recipients: ;/
just FYI, sendmail can be configured to do different things when To: is
missing - there's sendmail option NoRecipientAction, configured by setting
John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
undisclosed recipients is used for Bcc: mail
I used it
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
header __L_UNDISCLOSED1 To:raw =~ /undisclosed-recipients: ;/
Just how do I go about figuring out what the To:raw value is (for example)?
header __TO_RAW To:raw =~ /.+/
If you're analyzing something that may have multiple
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
header __L_UNDISCLOSED1 To:raw =~ /undisclosed-recipients: ;/
Just how do I go about figuring out what the To:raw value is (for
example)?
header __TO_RAW To:raw =~ /.+/
If you're analyzing something that may
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, John Hardin wrote:
Granted, but in metas such a test can be useful:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FTO_NOsrcpath=jhardin
Every now and then, someone posts a link like this one, and I find myself
looking at a kind of 'index' page that frankly doesn't mean a thing
Hi.
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
with no Cc: line.
Unfortunately, the rule that I have:
header L_UNDISCLOSEDTo:raw =~ /undisclosed-recipients: ?;/
describe L_UNDISCLOSED To: list is meaningless and no Cc:
score
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi.
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
with no Cc: line.
I went round and round with this a while back.
SA 3.25 has a problem with perl null vs 0 vs ''.
so a To header (or CC header) with no content looks
On 11/23/2009 12:10 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi.
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
with no Cc: line.
I went round and round with this a while back.
SA 3.25 has a problem with perl null vs 0
Philip Prindeville wrote:
but as you say, if it can't tell the difference between and undef,
then that's an issue.
use header ALL to check for a \nCC
(which could be blank)
or just use your MTA to reject it at SMTPtime.
On 11/23/2009 12:18 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
but as you say, if it can't tell the difference between and undef,
then that's an issue.
use header ALL to check for a \nCC
(which could be blank)
or just use your MTA to reject it at SMTPtime.
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com
wrote:
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
with no Cc: line.
What's Cc: have to do with it? undisclosed recipients is used for
Bcc: mail
I used it all
On tir 24 nov 2009 01:11:38 CET, LuKreme wrote
I used it all the time. And you WILL 'block' legitimate mail.
and thats always sender to decide its legitimate :)
i see a pattern there
--
xpoint
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
undisclosed recipients is used for Bcc: mail
I used it all the time. And you
On 11/23/2009 05:11 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com
wrote:
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
with no Cc: line.
What's Cc: have to do with it?
On 11/23/2009 05:11 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com
wrote:
I want to block all messages that I'm getting that have:
To: undisclosed recipients: ;
with no Cc: line.
What's Cc: have to do with it?
16 matches
Mail list logo
