R-Elists wrote on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:56:22 -0800:
i appreciate your input, yet i really wanted Warren to answer for his blog
post on it in specific terms related to SA
i can handle absolutes pretty easy...
if we shouldnt use SARE with 3.3.x, no prob.
How long have you been following
Just try it out. You will find that the detection rate
without SARE is excellent and there's likely no benefit from
SARE. Most SARE are well outdated. This applies to 3.2.5 as well.
Kai
Kai
i appreciate your input, yet i really wanted Warren to answer for his blog
post on it in
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for
RPM packages and distro-specific notes.
quote
* STOP USING SARE or OpenProtect. They died a long time ago. Some of
their rules are dangerous or redundant. Many of the
Spamassassin List wrote on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:24:27 +0800:
So how do I stop using sare or openprotect?
remove the rules?
remove the channels?
I suppose you know if you use them or not, do you?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
So how do I stop using sare or openprotect?
remove the rules?
remove the channels?
I suppose you know if you use them or not, do you?
Yes I am using it. Since the blog advise to stop using it,
thus I am wondering how do I do so? I had remove the sa-update
from my crontab. Do I need to
Spamassassin List wrote on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:38:21 +0800:
I had remove the sa-update
from my crontab.
You have to keep using sa-update! Just not these channels!
Do I need to remove all those dostech_net.cf
files?
Of course. You have to remove everything from
Of course. You have to remove everything from
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003000 that you do not want to use. As an example,
that is what remains here:
Thank you
-Original Message-
From: Spamassassin List [mailto:spamassassinl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:24 AM
To: 'Warren Togami'; 'SpamAssassin Dev'; 'SpamAssassin Users List'
Subject: RE: spamassassin-3.3.0 for Fedora/RHEL
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
R-Elists wrote on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:41:23 -0800:
by this website are you saying that we should only stop using SARE and
OpenProtect on 3.3.0 and later...
or are you saying that some of the SARE rules were put into 3.2.5 ???
Just try it out. You will find that the detection rate without
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for
RPM packages and distro-specific notes.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Warren Togami wrote:
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for RPM
packages and distro-specific notes.
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page, it's a
*one liner* !
Kai
--
Get your web
On 01/26/2010 03:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page,
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page, it's
14 matches
Mail list logo
