On 05/13/2013 06:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
No, the basic difference is that VCS operating on the whole tree can
only have branches (and thus merge info) on the whole tree either, so
you*can't* go like subversion does and map branches into the tree and
need to have them (and tags) as a separate
On 05/15/2013 04:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Zé jose.pas...@gmx.com wrote:
What has been said regarding
subversions lack of support for branching was, I think, quite clear.
Well, no. The only thing you've made clear is that you don't like it
or you don't
On 05/15/2013 06:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Reedick
andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net wrote:
Plus, telling people not use to svn's touted directory manipulation
features because of side-effects is a bit self-defeating.
Not if you want it to act like SCM's
Guten Tag Zé,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie:
The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems
is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info
to those revisions, while Subversion doesn't.
Which useful info besides the name, and always
On 5/18/2013 9:37 AM, Zé wrote:
On 05/15/2013 06:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Reedick
andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net wrote:
Plus, telling people not use to svn's touted directory manipulation
features because of side-effects is a bit self-defeating.
Not
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
...
Let's put it this way: if that was actually a tag then it could also be
argued that any file system supports branching/tagging.
You ignore the versioning part of Subversion and that it guarantees
the state/history of
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the
contents of a directory and you rely on changes made to that directory
to emulate branches,
On 5/18/2013 12:01 PM, Zé wrote:
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the
contents of a directory and you rely on changes made to that
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 9:33 PM, David Chapman dcchap...@acm.org wrote:
On 5/18/2013 12:01 PM, Zé wrote:
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track
On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:33:10 +, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
...
That's not an argument at all, because all one does in other SCMs is
creating branches and tags. What you really should argue is what all
devs think is common sense about branches and tags
You mean like 'I expect tags to be
On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:33:10 +, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
Guten Tag Zé,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie:
The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems
is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info
to those revisions, while
On Sat, 18 May 2013 17:24:33 +, Zé wrote:
...
Compared to how other SCM systems handle tags, subversion also doesn't
have tags as a separate concept. Subversion provides a way to pinpoint
each commit objectively and unambiguously by specifying specific
revisions.
Not even that. You
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:16:48 +, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
...
Please be concrete, and give examples of what really bothers you as a
user or an admin in your daily work. Saying that branches are not
first class, or I don't like it that Subversion implements
branches/tags by copying directories
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:16:48 +, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
...
Please be concrete, and give examples of what really bothers you as a
user or an admin in your daily work. Saying that branches are not
first class, or I don't
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, May 18, 2013 at 23:38:11 +0200:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
The good old 'svn commit file; svn log' doesn't show the commit to
file issue?
Sorry? What issue is that?
This one is actually in the FAQ. It's inherent to
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, May 18, 2013 at 23:38:11 +0200:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:16:48 +, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
...
Please be concrete, and give examples of what really bothers you as a
user or an admin in your
16 matches
Mail list logo
