On 9/1/07, Brian Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're talking about TC6, there is no common/lib or shared/lib;
$CATALINA_HOME/lib is correct...
Oh crap, I was going off my 5.5 install!
Hassan:
Ok, lend me a hand here, besides
You certainly do not want to have tomcat stop responding to port it is
listening too, it would be useless :) Except if you want your tomcat to
not serve anything to anyone.
If what you want is prevent client browser to use keep-alive connection
and issue several requests on same connection,
I'm not really trying to use webapps at all - I want each Host to be
associated with a user account, like this:
Host name=user1.com appBase=/home/user1/public_html.../Host
Host name=user2.com appBase=/home/user2/public_html.../Host
Host name=user3.com appBase=/home/user3/public_html.../Host
On
Ooops.
This is what I currently have:
Host name=localhost appBase=webapps/
Host name=mydomain.com appBase=/home/user0/public_html
Aliaswww.mydomain.com/Alias
Context path= docBase=/home/user0/public_html reloadable=true/
/Host
What do I need to change so that mydomain.com/whatever will
Peter Boughton wrote:
Ooops.
This is what I currently have:
Host name=localhost appBase=webapps/
Host name=mydomain.com appBase=/home/user0/public_html
Aliaswww.mydomain.com/Alias
Context path= docBase=/home/user0/public_html reloadable=true/
/Host
What do I need to change so
Ok, tried using that configuration, but I'm still getting the 405 method not
supported error for any jsp file.
Does the fact that it is apparently reaching the right directory now mean
that this is more likely to be a new problem with web.xml rather than
server.xml?
Thanks,
Peter
On 9/2/07,
Hello,
I have tomcat 5.5.23 running with Java 1.5.0.11 on Windows Server 2003 SP1.
I had been running tomcat 5.0 w/ Java 1.4.2 with the exact same Java options
(including -XX:+AggressiveHeap) and I never had issues with tomcat starting
up via the Windows service. Now, if I try to start it
On 9/1/07, Brian Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, lend me a hand here, besides the incorrect statement about
common/lib, does everything else look fine?
The only discrepancy from my own config is that per the examples
in the JNDI config notes
From: Peter Boughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: full path of 404 file
Does the fact that it is apparently reaching the right
directory now mean that this is more likely to be a new
problem with web.xml rather than server.xml?
Sounds like you really need to post your
Was starting to think the same thing, and then I thought to actually try the
local Host, and all the standard tomcat/webapps code and examples are all
working there.
So, that must mean it's a configuration difference between the main Host and
the one I'm trying to add?
The only thing I can think
Mike, just an FYI:
This morning I tried my little 'hello, world' recipe on Tomcat 6;
aside from having to place the driver jar file in $CATALINA/lib,
everything else works the same.
Hope it helps you
-- brian
-
To start a new
On 9/2/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be honest, I can't find any other documentation on that -- what
alternative values might be, or their effect. And I just gave it a quick
try with no setting and LambdaProbe's data sources page shows a
blank for Auth -- but accessing
From: Jeff Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tomcat startup w/ aggressiveheap option
I think it actually starts up fine from the command line,
but I'd have to confirm that
Definitely need to confirm that first, before trying the service.
There are some checks made when setting
From: Brian Munroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please help...
Yea when I was originally struggling with getting connection pooling
working, I was crafting my Resource and was googling like mad trying
to find some reference to what that attribute meant.
The auth attribute is the
That's a good idea. :)
I don't have a WEB-INF directory created yet - it does get auto-created,
right?
Anyway, here's /usr/local/jakarta/tomcat/conf/web.xml (with a few million
mime types snipped out):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
web-app
On 9/2/07, Peter Boughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a WEB-INF directory created yet - it does get auto-created,
right?
No.
Anyway, here's /usr/local/jakarta/tomcat/conf/web.xml
You shouldn't have to touch this at all, and I certainly wouldn't make
any changes there until you've
On 9/2/07, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The auth attribute is the equivalent of res-auth element inside a
web.xml resource-ref setting, as defined in the servlet spec. The
valid values are Application or Container.
Chuck:
So I guess I should probably read the Realm
On 9/2/07, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The auth attribute is the equivalent of res-auth element inside a
web.xml resource-ref setting, as defined in the servlet spec. The
valid values are Application or Container.
OK, in a resource-ref, res-auth is a mandatory element. What
From: Brian Munroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please help...
So I guess I should probably read the Realm Configuration HOW-TO and
Security Manager HOW-TO on the Tomcat documentation page?
Not really. The Realm configuration documents how clients login to
applications, not how
From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please help...
OK, in a resource-ref, res-auth is a mandatory element. What does
that imply about leaving it out of a Resource in a Tomcat config?
What's the default?
I take it you've noticed there's not a whole lot of
On 9/2/07, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take it you've noticed there's not a whole lot of documentation on
Resource...
Oh, yeah, I've noticed. :-)
Looking at the code, the default is indeed Container, which would be the
typical usage.
Thanks for the clarification!
--
On 9/2/07, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really. The Realm configuration documents how clients login to
applications, not how Tomcat (or your app) login to external resources.
The Security Manager describes how to place limits on what application
code can do within
From: Brian Munroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please help...
After digesting that, it seems like auth=Container is what should be
used when doing connection pooling, since Tomcat will be managing the
resources?
Correct. It appears that Container is the default, but setting it
On 9/2/07, Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct. It appears that Container is the default, but setting it
explicitly certainly won't hurt.
Gotcha, thanks.
-- brian
-
To start a new topic, e-mail:
I don't have a WEB-INF directory created yet - it does get auto-created,
right?
No.
Ooops. :$
I created WEB-INF, chmod-ed, and it starts working now.
(Well, the CFMLServlet works, the JSP servlet doesn't, but I don't really
need that so I'm content to leave it.)
Thanks to everyone for
Manivannan Palanichamy wrote:
I need to design a web application that may use threads. Thats, the web
application might have to read some 200 files from network. In order to
speed up the process, I've decided to use threads/thread pooling. But,
however I know it is not a good practice to use
Just in case any other poor soul is trying to sort out such an error, thought
I'd post my discovery after 6 hours of hair pulling...!
The documentation I was following to set up the ISAPI redirector stated that
I should create the ISAPI filter on the Web Sites folder in IIS. I did this,
and all
27 matches
Mail list logo
