Re: jvm exits without trace

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Crowther
On 27 March 2010 00:22, David Kerber dcker...@verizon.net wrote: BTW, after looking back at my development notes, the jdbc-odbc bridges, while a pain to set up, have better performance than the type 4 drivers that Sybase also offers. That's frightening, given the extra layers of code for the

Re: jvm exits without trace

2010-03-27 Thread David Kerber
Peter Crowther wrote: On 27 March 2010 00:22, David Kerber dcker...@verizon.net wrote: BTW, after looking back at my development notes, the jdbc-odbc bridges, while a pain to set up, have better performance than the type 4 drivers that Sybase also offers. That's frightening, given the

Re: /META-INF/context.xml is being copied to $CATALINA_HOME/conf/my_engine/my_app/ROOT.xml

2010-03-27 Thread André Warnier
Dave Cherkassky wrote: ... Just a note : in the setup you showed, most if not all Alias tags are unnecessary, since they just duplicate the name you have in the Host tag. You need an Alias tag only if you want to access the same virtual host through different DNS names. Like : Host

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-27 Thread André Warnier
Hassan Schroeder wrote: Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform because I don't know if the author (a certain mthomas) will mention it here.

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-27 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/3/27 André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com: http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform Might this not also be worth preserving in the Tomcat FAQ/wiki ? There is

Win7 calling native code via JNI

2010-03-27 Thread Patrick Flaherty
Hello, I have a ROOT webapp running in Tomcat 6.0.20 as a SERVICE on Windows 7 and it runs fine calling native code via JNI. Now for debugging purposes : I'm trying to run it with tomcat not running as a service (tomcat started via startup.bat) and the load of my bridge dll is ok, but as

RE: Win7 calling native code via JNI

2010-03-27 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Patrick Flaherty [mailto:pflah...@rampageinc.com] Subject: Win7 calling native code via JNI as soon as I call the dll's init function (CPPInit) it crashed the JVM. Are you using the same JVM when you run Tomcat as a service? The one in this crash is the 32-bit client, but you're on

Re: Win7 calling native code via JNI

2010-03-27 Thread Bill Barker
Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote in message news:99c8b2929b39c24493377ac7a121e21f96d2507...@usea-exch8.na.uis.unisys.com... From: Patrick Flaherty [mailto:pflah...@rampageinc.com] Subject: Win7 calling native code via JNI as soon as I call the dll's init function

Re: httpd vs. Tomcat performance

2010-03-27 Thread Auser99
Thanks for the link. au http://www.xprad.org/ Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote: Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform because I don't know

Re: Deploying a simple webservice for testing on tomcat gives HTTP 404

2010-03-27 Thread Arunkumar Janarthanan
Have you checked the URL path from the Tomcat manager page is correct ? On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, SM moni_spar...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all, I developed a simple web service and deployed it on Tomcat 6.0.24 and when I debug on server it gives me http 404. There are no errors in the

Re: sticky session failover

2010-03-27 Thread Arunkumar Janarthanan
Len, Do you have a the nofailover parameter disabled ? this can help users continue served by the working tomcat instances in-case of the tomcat instance which cookie parameter set fails / not available. Proxy balancer://abc BalancerMember ajp://prod1:8081 route=app1 BalancerMember

Re: Win7 calling native code via JNI

2010-03-27 Thread Patrick Flaherty
There is only a 32 bit JVM on the machine. The bridge dll has not been recompiled since mid '08. If it was an incompatibility with the Microsoft Runtime Library wouldn't you expect the Service Version to do the same ? If you look at the code you will see I try to create a file on the root of