Hi,
I'm using tomcat 6 and HypericHQ for monitoring via JMX.
I don't know if this is an hyperic issue or not, but i wonder if there is an
option to fix it via tomcat/java configuration. the reason that i don't know
if this is an hyperic or a tomcat/java configuration issue is because that
when we
On 12/03/2011 22:07, Scott Dudley wrote:
I'm running Tomcat 6.0.24 on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS.
Best if you upgrade to 6.0.32 / 7.0.11. There have been lots of fixes
since then.
I'm trying to
configure WebDav and limit access to a single folder, a subdirectory of
my applications www folder...
On 13/03/2011 05:37, Brian Braun wrote:
%@ taglib uri=*/WEB-INF/struts-bean.tld* prefix=*bean*%
That page fails, because it is not being able to find the TLD file anymore.
What should I do? I really want to get rid of the info messages.
- Do I need to delete the TLDs from my WEB-INF
On 13/03/2011 08:33, Maimon Oded wrote:
Hi,
I'm using tomcat 6 and HypericHQ for monitoring via JMX.
I don't know if this is an hyperic issue or not, but i wonder if there is an
option to fix it via tomcat/java configuration. the reason that i don't know
if this is an hyperic or a tomcat/java
Hi Mark,
You said:
Yes. You need to refer to the taglibs in your JSPs using the URI rather
than the file location. e.g.
%@ taglib uri=http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean; prefix=bean%
Does it mean that my code will not work if I'm not connected to the
internet? Or that it will run lightly slower
On 13/03/2011 12:09, Brian Braun wrote:
Hi Mark,
You said:
Yes. You need to refer to the taglibs in your JSPs using the URI rather
than the file location. e.g.
%@ taglib uri=http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean; prefix=bean%
Does it mean that my code will not work if I'm not connected to
OK, I will find out what are the URIs of the TLDs.
Thanks a lot
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/03/2011 12:09, Brian Braun wrote:
Hi Mark,
You said:
Yes. You need to refer to the taglibs in your JSPs using the URI rather
than the file
2011/3/13 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 13/03/2011 05:37, Brian Braun wrote:
- Should I tell Tomcat not to show those info messages somehow?
No.
If you really want to silence the messages, without changing anything
in your application, it is possible by adding the following line to
It seems that only using the new jdbc pool has solved the memory leak :]
it's funny that the idea to use it came from a different thread here in the
users list. :]
Thanks for your help
Hila
בתאריך 7 במרס 2011 17:15, מאת הילה hilavalen...@gmail.com:
Thanks :]
I'll dig into it.
Any other
It seems that only using the new jdbc pool has solved the memory leak :]
it's funny that the idea to use it came from a different thread here in the
users list. :]
Thanks for your help
Hila
בתאריך 9 במרס 2011 22:33, מאת הילה hilavalen...@gmail.com:
Sure, when I'll have a final results and
Hi Don,
As someone mentioned the network can imit you. If your bandwidth utilization is
at 60% or over you are in trouble since collisions start to become a serious
issue.
Also, I have measured around 600microseconds for resonse time when using
localhost and running the client on the same
I'm using tomcat 7.0.8 on Ubuntu 10.10.
I've got a servlet doing Servlet 3.0 asynchronous processing, using
HttpServletRequest.startAsync().
The AsyncContext.complete() is later called from a different thread, but it's
*not* one that was started by AsyncContext.start().
I'm wondering if anyone
On 13/03/2011 22:33, Chris wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone can comment about whether calling complete() in this
way might cause problems. In general things seem to be working but I'm seeing
behaviour in some situations that leads me to believe requests may not be
properly completed/closed.
On 3/13/2011 5:01 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi Don,
As someone mentioned the network can imit you. If your bandwidth utilization is
at 60% or over you are in trouble since collisions start to become a serious
issue.
Ah, that's something I had not thought of. I'm running ~80% network
utilization
Hi Konstantin,
I really, really, really appreciate the information you have given to me in
your response. Thanks a lot!
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/3/13 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 13/03/2011 05:37, Brian Braun wrote:
-
Thanks for the comments Mark. I've upgraded to 7.0.11 and the issues I was
seeing seem to be gone.
You only mentioned the HTTP APR connecter, but I've noticed a difference for
both HTTP APR and AJP APR.
Does it make sense that the fix also affects AJP?
Thanks,
Chris
On March 13, 2011 06:49:16
Based on Mark Thomas' recommendation in another thread, I've upgraded to tomcat
7.0.11 and the issues I was seeing seem to be fixed.
This seems to be the relevant changelog entry:
Fix issues that prevented asynchronous servlets from working when used with
the HTTP APR connector on platforms
On 14/03/2011 00:21, Chris wrote:
Thanks for the comments Mark. I've upgraded to 7.0.11 and the issues I was
seeing seem to be gone.
You only mentioned the HTTP APR connecter, but I've noticed a difference for
both HTTP APR and AJP APR.
Does it make sense that the fix also affects AJP?
18 matches
Mail list logo
