On 30.10.2015 01:03, Farzad Panahi wrote:
Hi,
I am using tomcat 8.0.23 to terminate my websocket connections. I was
looking at my trace logs and noticed that when tomcat worker thread
responsible for processing websocket messages switches to a different
thread, there is about 80ms delay. In my
I tried this already...
$httpProvider.interceptors.push(function () {
return {
'responseError': function (rejection) {
var s = rejection.status;
return rejection;
}
};
});
But the
I want to say thank you all for your help and many different ways to solve
my problem. I think the most -maybe all- will work in an ideal world without
hard requirements through legacy client-applications. I don't want to hold
on BASIC as auth-method because I like it so much, I prefer to kick
On 30/10/2015 00:03, Farzad Panahi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using tomcat 8.0.23 to terminate my websocket connections. I was
> looking at my trace logs and noticed that when tomcat worker thread
> responsible for processing websocket messages switches to a different
> thread, there is about 80ms
> I want to say thank you all for your help and many different ways to solve
> my problem. I think the most -maybe all- will work in an ideal world without
> hard requirements through legacy client-applications. I don't want to hold
> on BASIC as auth-method because I like it so much, I prefer to
Am 31.10.2015 1:39 vorm. schrieb chris derham :
>
> > I want to say thank you all for your help and many different ways to solve
> > my problem. I think the most -maybe all- will work in an ideal world
> > without
> > hard requirements through legacy client-applications. I
Farzad,
On 10/30/15 6:10 PM, Farzad Panahi wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation David.
>
> I added System.nanoTime() to get high resolution numbers. Nano second
> numbers are telling me the same thing. When thread changes we see a
> difference of about 82ms (3082462134714 - 3082379268473 =
Hello,
Could you help me in resolving the below queries with respect to Apache tomcat
version - 7.0.23?
1. Till when is the version 7.0.23 of Apache tomcat supported?
2. What are the security vulnerabilities associated with 7.0.23?
3. What plug in would be required to fix
On 30/10/2015 13:40, Rohit Prakash wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you help me in resolving the below queries with respect to Apache
> tomcat version - 7.0.23?
>
> 1. Till when is the version 7.0.23 of Apache tomcat supported?
No date has yet been set for the end of life / end of support for
Thanks a lot Marc. It really helps
Thanks and Regards,
Rohit Prakash, PMP(r)
Manager - Projects
...
Mobile +91-9717132333| IP Phone - 61131267 |
On 10/29/15 7:14 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On 10/29/15 4:28 AM, simone.rodenbach@devk.de wrote:
>> Thx,
>>
>> I hope this information helps: (The
>> org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool starts a timer ... )
>>
>> ava.util.TimerThread @ 0xc0772288
André - I like your humour :D
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:38 AM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> On 30.10.2015 01:03, Farzad Panahi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using tomcat 8.0.23 to terminate my websocket connections. I was
>> looking at my trace logs and noticed that when tomcat
Mark - Could you elaborate a bit more on what you mean by "resolution
of the timestamps for the log messages"? If you are referring to the
log4j latency (https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Latency),
it is in microseconds.
If it has anything to do with the logger why is it
Mark,,, Konstantin...
thank you so much for input...
what I found was that the way "I had it"...
I was getting 404 on the welcome screen ---
but my app still runs and the cyber scanner show clean ..
{even though I don’t see x-frame-options in the header response }
so when I was testing --on a
On 10/30/2015 3:23 PM, Farzad Panahi wrote:
Mark - Could you elaborate a bit more on what you mean by "resolution
of the timestamps for the log messages"? If you are referring to the
log4j latency (https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Latency),
it is in microseconds.
If it
Thanks for the explanation David.
I added System.nanoTime() to get high resolution numbers. Nano second
numbers are telling me the same thing. When thread changes we see a
difference of about 82ms (3082462134714 - 3082379268473 = 82866241).
Within the same thread the time difference is something
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 20:42
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Suppress or replace WWW-Authorization header
On 28.10.2015 17:42, Torsten Rieger wrote:
> -Ursprüngliche
17 matches
Mail list logo