Thank you for your links.
Now, I fully understand what I should make a change to
server.xml.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
Kazuhiko Kohmoto
On 2020/02/13 19:17, Olaf Kock wrote:
On 13.02.20 10:36, kohm...@iris.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
On 2020/02/13 18:25, André Warnier (tomcat/perl) wrote:
Check in th
Thank you for your kind response to my mail.
I read the changinglog. I might understand the contents.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
Kazuhiko Kohmoto
On 2020/02/13 19:26, Olaf Kock wrote:
On 13.02.20 11:17, Olaf Kock wrote:
On 13.02.20 10:36, kohm...@iris.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
On 2020/02/13 18:25, And
Dear André Warnier,
Thank you for the following-up. I now am understanding what
I should make a change on server.xml.
Thank you for your kind response and Tomcat Users List's
conversation.
Yours truly,
Kazuhiko Kohmoto
PS.
Sorry, not response to you quickly, because in Japan time
was nigh
Last night, we switched the customer box in question from running Tomcat
under Java 7 (64-bit) to Java 8 (64-bit), and all day today, the
processor load from the Tomcat server has been dramatically lighter. I
haven't seen the overall CPU over around 70% today, and haven't seen the
Tomcat's JVM
Team,
What is the EOL Date for Apache Tomcat 9?
Best Regards,
Reneesh K
Stafan,
On 2/13/20 14:56, Stefan Mayr wrote:
Hi Chris,
Am 13.02.2020 um 15:31 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
[snip]
The answer to the question "why change the default?" is: "because the
default was essentially insecure, in a way that wasn't obvious to
someone who wasn't paying close attention."
On 13/02/2020 19:56, Stefan Mayr wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Am 13.02.2020 um 15:31 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>> [snip]
>> The answer to the question "why change the default?" is: "because the
>> default was essentially insecure, in a way that wasn't obvious to
>> someone who wasn't paying close att
Hi Chris,
Am 13.02.2020 um 15:31 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
> [snip]
> The answer to the question "why change the default?" is: "because the
> default was essentially insecure, in a way that wasn't obvious to
> someone who wasn't paying close attention."
>
> So we are forcing users to pay close
On 13/02/2020 15:31, Christopher Schultz wrote:
My question would be "why do so many have AJP connectors where no
'address' attribute was specifically configured?"
The answer to the question "why change the default?" is: "because the
default was essentially insecure, in a way that wasn't obvio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Peter,
On 2/13/20 5:05 AM, logo wrote:
>
>
> Am 2020-02-13 10:57, schrieb Olivier Jaquemet:
>> On 13/02/2020 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:33 AM Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
On 13/02/2020 01:02, Stefan Mayr wrote:
From: Mark Thomas mailto:ma...@apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, Feb 13, 2020, 7:38 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 9.0.31 available
On 13/02/2020 12:42, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> Can you still use a shared secre
Hi,
forget about the potential bug. Sorry for taking your time. Seems like
that WriteAbortedException is thrown when reading object data
occasionally. AFAIK I understand it, it's just like a container
exception; the actual error is stored in the exception's cause. Uh...
that's odd...
Carste
On 13/02/2020 12:42, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> Can you still use a shared secret, if desired, while “
> You can specify "0.0.0.0" (IPv4) or "::" (IPv6) to restore the behaviour
> of listening on any address
> “
Yes.
Use (or not) of a secret is independent of the listening
Hi there,
Chris, thanks for your fast GIT introduction :) I took this as a
(mental) starting point for developing the new 'persistAuthentication'
option of the Managers (Standard and Persistent). Almost there... I will
push this branch to my GitHub fork as soon as possible (tomorrow?).
Maybe
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 05:17 wrote:
> I am trying to run one new plugin of jira using tomcat. But tomcat is not
> getting started due to below error. Can you please let me know how this
> error can be resolved?
>
> I am using Apache Tomcat Version 8.5.35.
>
> Error is as below.
>
> [ERROR] Failed
From: Mark Thomas mailto:ma...@apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, Feb 13, 2020, 5:41 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 9.0.31 available
On 13/02/2020 09:57, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Thu, Fe
On 13/02/2020 12:04, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2020 12:41, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/02/2020 09:57, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
>>> I understand the need to introduce a "secured by default" AJP
>>> configuration.
>>> However, I question one choice that was made for this change : the
>>> d
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:04 PM Olivier Jaquemet <
olivier.jaque...@jalios.com> wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2020 12:41, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 13/02/2020 09:57, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
> >> I understand the need to introduce a "secured by default" AJP
> >> configuration.
> >> However, I question one ch
On 13/02/2020 12:41, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 13/02/2020 09:57, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
I understand the need to introduce a "secured by default" AJP
configuration.
However, I question one choice that was made for this change : the
default behavior of the AJP connector to listen only on the loopb
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
Jira is properly installed and does not have any issue. Error is only coming
when running it with tomcat. This issue is specific when deploying application
using Tomcat. Kindly let me know how this issue can be resolved.
Regards,
Prasanna
-Original Message-
On 13/02/2020 09:57, Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:33 AM Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
>>> On 13/02/2020 01:02, Stefan Mayr wrote:
> - AJP defaults changed to listen the loopback address, require a
> secret
> and to be di
Please do not cross-post to multiple lists.
Usage questions belong on the users list.
In this instance, since your issue is with Atlassian Jira, you'll need
to contact Atlassian support.
Mark
On 13/02/2020 11:17, prasanna.mahap...@cognizant.com wrote:
> Dear Team,
>
> I am trying to run one n
On 13.02.2020 11:05, logo wrote:
Am 2020-02-13 10:57, schrieb Olivier Jaquemet:
On 13/02/2020 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:33 AM Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
On 13/02/2020 01:02, Stefan Mayr wrote:
- AJP defaults changed to listen the loopback address, require a secre
On 13.02.2020 10:36, kohm...@iris.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
On 2020/02/13 18:25, André Warnier (tomcat/perl) wrote:
Check in the file (tomcat_dir)/conf/server.xml, the Connector :
The setting is the same as mine.
I have use server.xml used in 8.5.50. In case of 8.5.50, I have no problem.
Ple
Dear Team,
I am trying to run one new plugin of jira using tomcat. But tomcat is not
getting started due to below error. Can you please let me know how this error
can be resolved?
If this is not the correct email id for this kind of help, then please route me
to the correct email id or support
On 13.02.20 11:17, Olaf Kock wrote:
> On 13.02.20 10:36, kohm...@iris.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
>> On 2020/02/13 18:25, André Warnier (tomcat/perl) wrote:
>>> Check in the file (tomcat_dir)/conf/server.xml, the Connector :
>>>
>>>
>> The setting is the same as mine.
>>
>> I have use server.xml used
On 13.02.20 10:36, kohm...@iris.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> On 2020/02/13 18:25, André Warnier (tomcat/perl) wrote:
>> Check in the file (tomcat_dir)/conf/server.xml, the Connector :
>>
>>
>
> The setting is the same as mine.
>
> I have use server.xml used in 8.5.50. In case of 8.5.50, I have no
>
Am 2020-02-13 10:57, schrieb Olivier Jaquemet:
On 13/02/2020 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:33 AM Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
On 13/02/2020 01:02, Stefan Mayr wrote:
- AJP defaults changed to listen the loopback address, require a
secret
and to be disabled in the sa
On 13/02/2020 10:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:33 AM Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
On 13/02/2020 01:02, Stefan Mayr wrote:
- AJP defaults changed to listen the loopback address, require a secret
and to be disabled in the sample server.xml
[snip]
Am I correct ? Why such a c
On 2020/02/13 18:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
It is obviously best to keep default configurations as stable as possible.
But sometimes things have to change ... As a result, you'll indeed need to
adjust your server.xml according to your deployment and AJP usage.
The documentation for the new attrib
On 2020/02/13 18:22, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
need to adjust your server.xml to that
I think this time problem seems not due to server.xml.
The server.xml works well with 8.5.50.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
Kazuhiko Kohmoto
-
To un
On 2020/02/13 18:25, André Warnier (tomcat/perl) wrote:
Check in the file (tomcat_dir)/conf/server.xml, the Connector :
The setting is the same as mine.
I have use server.xml used in 8.5.50. In case of 8.5.50, I have no
problem.
Please notice, I have been using Tomcat for 5 years wit
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:33 AM Olivier Jaquemet <
olivier.jaque...@jalios.com> wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 01:02, Stefan Mayr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> - AJP defaults changed to listen the loopback address, require a secret
> >>and to be disabled in the sample server.xml
> > What was the motivation
On 13.02.2020 10:13, kohmoto wrote:
Hi,
I have install Tomcat 8.5.51 today and found something wrong.
I have been using tomcat for last 5 years and never met this kind of problem.
It would be appreciated if I could be advised.
Thank you.
System:
CentOS 7.7.1908
httpd 2.4.41 (community versio
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:13 AM kohmoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have install Tomcat 8.5.51 today and found something wrong.
>
> I have been using tomcat for last 5 years and never met this
> kind of problem.
>
> It would be appreciated if I could be advised.
>
Ok, so ...
> Caused by: java
Hi,
I have install Tomcat 8.5.51 today and found something wrong.
I have been using tomcat for last 5 years and never met this
kind of problem.
It would be appreciated if I could be advised.
Thank you.
System:
CentOS 7.7.1908
httpd 2.4.41 (community version)
httpd.conf:
(LoadModule pr
On 13/02/2020 01:02, Stefan Mayr wrote:
Hi,
- AJP defaults changed to listen the loopback address, require a secret
and to be disabled in the sample server.xml
What was the motivation behind this breaking change to require a secret
or to explitly disable it? What makes an open AJP connector
Dear James, Dear others,
I just get notice of this long thread. Sorry, if already give this suggestion.
But James: If it's possible, you may use (J)VisualVM with the "VisualGC" Plugin
to get some live impressions of "what's going on" with the heaps. To my
experience this visual perceptions is m
38 matches
Mail list logo
