Back in Tomcat 5, we had the problem with tomcat trying to access java.sun.com.
Lots of our servers are behind firewalls, so this
caused an error in the log. We realized one way to fix this was just to remove
the schemaLocation attribute from the web.xml files.
Below is the top of the main
Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:50 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: web.xml and schema location
2012/4/18 Mark Claassen ma...@donnell.com:
Back in Tomcat 5, we had the problem with tomcat trying to access
java.sun.com
I am not sure what your exact situation here is, but the user certificate
stuff is only available if Tomcat requests it. And Tomcat only does this if
Tomcat is using certificate based SSL authentication. I don't believe this
will work if an Apache webserver is handling the SSL negotiation.
Mark
I would like to have all my logging go through log4J and not have the
default XXX.date.log files created. Is there a way to do this? I got log4j
working, as it says in the docs, but the localhost.date.log is still created
and written to. From what I understand, I will need to put a
:
[/host-manager] =
like:
log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[Catalina].[localhost]=I
NFO, MANAGER
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:31 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Using log4J
Subject: Re: Using log4J and getting rid of default logs in Tomcat 6
See the note at the top of
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/logging.html. By default, TC 6 only
uses Juli for it's internal logging.
Mark Claassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As it turns out
, June 12, 2007 10:47 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using log4J and getting rid of default logs in Tomcat 6
Mark Claassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the reply.
I did get some logging to work already, so I am assuming that I have
Humm. I don't think this is how the certificate system is supposed to be
used. The intention is that the truststore handles certificates authorities
you trust.
For an example, let's switch to the browser.
Browsers generally trust Verisgn and Thwart out of the box. You can see
these
/11/07, Mark Claassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Humm. I don't think this is how the certificate system is supposed to
be used. The intention is that the truststore handles certificates
authorities you trust.
For an example, let's switch to the browser.
Browsers generally trust Verisgn
param-value1.5/param-value
/init-param
load-on-startup3/load-on-startup
/servlet
Hope that helps
Lakshmi
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:29 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Using Javac instead
Has anyone tried to get the jasper compiler to be something other than the
JDT? I tried several things, each of them not working.
The docs say an alternative compiler can be specified, but makes no mention
of how to specify it.
This seems to be controlled by settings in the web.xml.
Below is
mmons-logging-api.jar
Thanks again,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:10 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Using
Users List
Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
Even with this fix, neither of the values below worked.
param-valuecom.sun.tools.javac.main.Main/param-value
it. Still, I may investigate
it further this weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:23 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Using Javac instead of JDT to compile JSPs
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Now that I see Tomcat 6.0 is on it's way, I was wondering if OCSP is going
to be included? This is being required by more and more people these days
(like the US government).
If there are no plans to include it yet, how can this issue be escalated? I
see that OCSP support is bundled into the
output on the connectors?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Random HTTP 502 errors
I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on some strange 502 errors I
am having when going
Does anyone have any experience with this?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:26 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat and OCSP
Does the new support for OCSP in Java 5.0 have any impact on how
certificates
Does the new support for OCSP in Java 5.0 have any impact on how
certificates are handled in Tomcat?
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/pki-tiger.html
It looks like it might just work if it is set up right in the java property
files. I checked the mailing list archives and found
=false redirectPort=8443
acceptCount=100
debug=0 connectionTimeout=2
disableUploadTimeout=true /
Leo
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:51 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: [SPAM
Andrew
On 12/06/2006, at 3:08 PM, Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Say Tomcat is on a
machine called TestMachine.
If I put 127.0.0.1 in the address field, it accepts connections of
the form http: //127.0.0.1/... only It does not accept connections
from http
in the email addresses
From: Mark Claassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Say Tomcat is on a
machine called TestMachine.
If I put 127.0.0.1 in the address field, it accepts connections of
the form http: //127.0.0.1/... only It does not accept connections
from http:
//TestMachine/..., even though
Is there to configure an HTTP Connector to only allow connections from
localhost? We have a server that has an HTTPS port that handles all public
access. However, we would like to leave a non SSL port open for a
monitoring program we have running on the same machine. We would like to
not allow
Thanks. I thought I heard that it was possible though
the address, but was not sure. I read this in the docs, but I guess I
didn't / don't understand the short explanation of
"address".
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:24
PMTo:
23 matches
Mail list logo