On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Kirk Hoganson wrote:
I am currently in the middle of an upgrade from Apache (2.2)/Tomcat
(5.5.16) to Apache (2.2)/Tomcat (6.0.24). The JVM is being upgraded
from
1.5.0_09-b01 to 1.6.0_22-b22. The new host servers will be RedHat 6.2.
Why are you upgrading to
-Original Message-
From: Jess Holle [mailto:je...@ptc.com]
...
It's that you can't make Java source code which /implements /JDBC interfaces
and make it compilable with both Java 6 and Java 7. The JDBC interfaces have
new methods in Java 7 *and* some of these new methods use
No wonder those guys were so reticent to change the JDBC API to
(directly) support the upcoming Java Date Time APIs: they've made everyone
so angry in the past they don't want to do it again ;)
- -chris
Chris,
DID/WILL they update the JDBC API to support the new date/time API? Or did they
Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I understand that
it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and that JMS is one of the
specifications that Tomcat does not implement. However, I'm wondering if any
Tomcat users out there have any experience with any JMS solutions
, at 11:20 AM, Williams, Nick wrote:
Knowing that Tomcat is not a full JavaEE application server, I understand
that it doesn't support all JavaEE specifications, and that JMS is one of the
specifications that Tomcat does not implement. However, I'm wondering if any
Tomcat users out there have
in a Tomcat Environment
On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:08 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
I do not have a preferred implementation, no. I understand the basics of JMS
and how it works, but I have never actually used it before.
I would second Chris' suggestion that you do a POC and try a few different
: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 2:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JMS in a Tomcat Environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Nick,
On 1/30/13 2:06 PM, Williams, Nick wrote:
Thanks for the input, both of you. I will take a look at the activity
in the repository and also inquire
Our enterprise apps are deployed in a 64-bit environment and we have not seen
any issues on Tomcat 64-bit with Spring Framework, Spring Security and
Hibernate. I would wager that, these days, 64-bit is more common than not.
However, I don't have any research to back up my opinion.
Nick
So I read some code in org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.java. When
parseParameters() is called, it checks whether the Content-Type is
multipart/form-data or application/x-www-form-urlencoded. If it's
application/x-www-form-urlencoded, it checks to make sure that the
Content-Length is not
, Mark.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 3:17 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Does maxPostSize has an effect on file upload?
On 14/12/2012 19:58, Williams, Nick wrote:
(Note: It's entirely possible that I'm reading
If it was using the global Content-length header, it would count not only the
encoded data bytes, but also the parts separators, headers etc..
So that's nice. It counts only the net data bytes, which is easier to compare
to the size on disk of a file that you would upload.
Indeed. A great
The way Tomcat is apparently doing it now is much more sensible, in my humble
opinion, because it does allow a direct and easy comparison with the files
being uploaded.
And since as per above it needs to be kept in some cases anyway, my vote - if
I had one - would be to not change it.
I
-Original Message-
From: Shanti Suresh [mailto:sha...@umich.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 1:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: JDK 1.6 or JDK 1.7
All,
I am trying to decide whether to run Tomcat 7.0.33 on JDK 1.6 or JDK 1.7.
Tomcat-7 release notes say:
Tomcat 7.0 is
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Is it possible to expire jvmRoute cookie
2. How one additional user can be a problem in such a system? If he
accesses a
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Suggestions for obtaining mod_jk for Amazon EC2
I'm trying to set up an Amazon EC2 instance as a proxying web server
for Tomcat using mod_jk. I'm using Amazon's basic Linux
32-bit AMI which doesn't include much --
-Original Message-
From: Williams, Nick [mailto:nicholas.willi...@ul.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:13 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Suggestions for obtaining mod_jk for Amazon EC2
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Suggestions
Just my smarmy reply to Tony's when Sun owned Java comment...
Used to be when Sun owned Java you got security updates months, not days, after
a vulnerability like this was discovered. :-)
Not saying I like Oracle (I loathe it most days); just making the point that
they were REALLY good about
FYI, effective immediately this (nicholas.willi...@ul.com) is my new email
address. I can no longer be reached at nicholas.willi...@puresafety.com.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nicholas.willi...@puresafety.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 4:57 PM
To: Tomcat
18 matches
Mail list logo
