On Yesterday at 11:58pm, RJ=Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RJ
RJ [..snip..]
RJ
RJ The ugly: stricter handling of JkMount/JkMountFile etc. with respect
RJ to virtual hosts. It should have behaved for a long time in the way,
RJ that mounts are not inherited between virtual hosts and also
Haroon Rafique wrote:
Your above question got me thinking and I said to myself, I don't harve any
VirtualHosts. And then, I remembered SSL. In my config for apache 2.2.6,
there is an include for conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf and of course :443 is
served via a VirtualHost.
Hmm, you might be
On Today at 5:45pm, MT=Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MT [..snip..]
MT
MT Hmm, you might be hitting the point here. When tightening up the vhost
MT mappings we probably overlooked the SSL (or any other protocol)
MT scenario, where the actual vhost is the same, only the protocol is
MT
On Dec 24 at 4:36pm, RJ=Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RJ The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability
RJ of version 1.2.26 of the Apache Tomcat Connectors.
RJ
RJ [..snip..]
So, JK 1.2.26 has been out for over a month and I finally got around to
upgrading from
Hi Haroon,
the change in the status worker display that you noticed is not directly
related to your problem, only so far, as we changed a couple of things
around the mount tables.
The good: more information in the status worker.
The ugly: stricter handling of JkMount/JkMountFile etc. with
: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 December 2007 4:36 a.m.
To: users@tomcat.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.26 Web Server Connector released
The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate
The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of version 1.2.26 of the Apache Tomcat Connectors.
It contains connectors, which allow a web server such as Apache HTTPD,
Microsoft IIS and Sun Web Server to act as a front end to the Tomcat web
application server.
This
