leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung
fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
> From: german.ferr...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:06:53 -0300
> Subject: tomcat-jdbc: correct way to create a new separated
> org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSource from anot
the PoolConfiguration to PoolProperties, but it doesn't seem safe for the
general case.
What would be the correct way to create a new separated DataSource from
another one having some properties changed?
I'm using tomcat-jdbc 7.0.29 as a standalone library.
Thank you.
Regards,
Germán
On 19/06/2012 18:55, S Ahmed wrote:
> Where is the source for the jdbc pool? Can't seem to find it here:
> https://github.com/apache/tomcat70
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/
The canonical version of the source code for an ASF project will always
be on A
d have to figure out which connection pool to grab before
getting a connection or you'd never get connected).
Next, you'd have to switch to tomcat-pool because commons-dbcp (the
default CP in Tomcat) does not support obtaining pooled connections
with credentials.
Next, you remove t
>It would be easier if all databases were hosted by a single instance
>of MySQL -- then you could use Tomcat-pool's feature of being able to
>provide credentials when obtaining connections from the pool -- and
>get the right database. That way, a much smaller number of connections
>could be maintai
On 31 May 2012, at 00:49, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> André,
>
> On 5/30/12 6:18 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>> Taking the same hypothetical case and figures :
>>
>> Assuming that you need a total of (1 * 4 connections) = 4
>> connections.
On 30 May 2012, at 23:19, "André Warnier" wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Christopher Schultz <
>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> ..
>>>
>>> If my environment and requirements match yours, you'd need 1 *
>>> max_pool_size * 66KiB at peak usage. That's about 640MiB for each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/30/12 6:18 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Taking the same hypothetical case and figures :
>
> Assuming that you need a total of (1 * 4 connections) = 4
> connections. Assuming that it takes 10ms to set up one such
> connection, and
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
..
If my environment and requirements match yours, you'd need 1 *
max_pool_size * 66KiB at peak usage. That's about 640MiB for each
connection you want in 10k pools. For a (uniform) max pool size o
Chris,
Great thanks that is exactly what I was looking for, just to get an idea at
this point.
And yes it was for mysql.
I was thinking one could create a smarter pool, one that created more
connections for sites used more often, and less for others.
Much appreciated.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ahmed,
On 5/29/12 9:29 AM, S Ahmed wrote:
> If my requirement for a hosted application is to give each
> customer a separate instance of mysql, I am curious how feasible
> that would be.
You can certainly do this.
> What is the memory footprint for
Ok, after upgrade to 7.0.27 I can see in catalina.out
May 16, 2012 6:29:13 PM org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.interceptor.SlowQueryReport
reportSlowQuery
WARNING: Slow Query Report SQL=/* named HQL query HotelView.findPriceById */
select minspohote0_.HOTEL as HOTEL27_, minspohote0_.ID_CITY_DEP as I
Pool works nice, but
I get empty logs/pool.2012-04-06.log
No debug messages, no slow query's.
Configuration below
---
datasource.xml:
---
${catalina.home}/conf/logging.properties:
handler
[mailto:sanjeev.sha...@buchanan-edwards.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 4:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JDBC Connection over VPN
Telnet seems to connect.
-Original Message-
From: Saurabh Makol [mailto:saurabh.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Telnet seems to connect.
-Original Message-
From: Saurabh Makol [mailto:saurabh.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JDBC Connection over VPN
Can you run
telnet 1521 from command prompt when you VPN into your
network?
On Mon, May 7
Can you run
telnet 1521 from command prompt when you VPN into your
network?
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Sanjeev Sharma <
sanjeev.sha...@buchanan-edwards.com> wrote:
> Using port 1521 in both cases, but it only fails for JDBC.
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Using port 1521 in both cases, but it only fails for JDBC.
-Original Message-
From: Propes, Barry L [mailto:barry.l.pro...@citi.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 3:43 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JDBC Connection over VPN
Could the VPN connection be utlizing the same p
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 2:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: JDBC Connection over VPN
Hi,
Not sure if this is a Tomcat issue. When I connect directly to a network and
startup my tomcat 7, my JDBC connection to an Oracle 11g network works just
fine, but if I tunnel into the same network, JDBC fai
Hi,
Not sure if this is a Tomcat issue. When I connect directly to a network and
startup my tomcat 7, my JDBC connection to an Oracle 11g network works just
fine, but if I tunnel into the same network, JDBC fails to connect to the
database. At the same time I'm able to make a connecti
me other valid query for your
> > DB).
>
> +1
>
> > See the following link for an explanation of those properties.
> >
> > https://commons.apache.org/dbcp/configuration.html
>
> - -1
>
> This is the wrong documentation for tomcat-pool. You're lo
t;removeAbandonedTimeout" value="60"/>
>
> You probably want to add testOnBorrow="true" and
> "validationQuery=SELECT 1" (or some other valid query for your
> DB).
+1
> See the following link for an explanation of those properties.
&
Just saw this too.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51237
You might want to check what version you are using.
Dan
- Original Message -
> Pool works nice, but
> I get empty logs/pool.2012-04-06.log
> No debug messages, no slow query's.
> Configuration below
>
> ---
- Original Message -
> Pool works nice, but
> I get empty logs/pool.2012-04-06.log
> No debug messages, no slow query's.
> Configuration below
Maybe you have really fast queries?
I believe if you set "threshold=-1", it should log all queries. Not something
you'd want to do in production
Pool works nice, but
I get empty logs/pool.2012-04-06.log
No debug messages, no slow query's.
Configuration below
---
datasource.xml:
---
${catalina.home}/conf/logging.properties:
handler
Daniel,
Your suggestion seems to have worked so far, thanks!
testOnBorrow="true" and "validationQuery=SELECT 1"
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > My db connections seem to be lost after an extended period of
> > inactivity
>
> There cou
sers List"
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:05:50 AM
> Subject: RE: [JDBC Pool] PoolCleaner creates some sort of memory
>
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> > 2012/3/30 Osipov, Michael :
> >> Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewv
> From: "Barry L Propes"
> To: "Tomcat Users List"
> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 7:53:26 AM
> Subject: RE: jdbc pool properties
>
> There are some databases that do go in and periodically kill off
> connections, aside from the Tomcat settings.
>
> I
"true"
timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis="-1"
minEvictableIdleTimeMillis="28800"
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Mikusa [mailto:dmik...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: jdbc pool properties
- Original Message -
> My d
- Original Message -
> My db connections seem to be lost after an extended period of
> inactivity
There could be a number of reasons that this occurs. Perhaps a network issue
is causing them to be disconnected or the database may be timing them out. At
any rate, it's not likely that
On 04/04/2012 12:08, S Ahmed wrote:
> My db connections seem to be lost after an extended period of inactivity
> (for a web application). And the only way to get the connections to work
> again is to restart tomcat.
>
> My tomcat.jdbc.pool.Datasource settings have:
>
>
>
>
>
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/30 Osipov, Michael :
>> Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, I am having trouble to build from source. I do
>> have some test failures, should I ignore them and go on?
>
>
2012/3/30 Osipov, Michael :
> Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
>
> Thanks for the patch, I am having trouble to build from source. I do have
> some test failures, should I ignore them and go on?
Please be more specific. In what test
Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
Thanks for the patch, I am having trouble to build from source. I do have some
test failures, should I ignore them and go on?
Another one, can we have a clearer name for the thread, e.g. like the I ha
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1306946
> -Original Message-
> From: Osipov, Michael [mailto:michael.osi...@siemens.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 1:36 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: [JDBC Pool] PoolCleaner creates
Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not
> be removed until all JDBC pools have been stopped.
> So, yes, one application can be the one that starts the thread, but
> not necessarily the one that stops it
Filip,
I
: SHA1
>
> Filip,
>
> On 3/28/12 12:00 PM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> > PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not
> > be removed until all JDBC pools have been stopped. So, yes, one
> > application can be the one that starts the t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
On 3/28/12 12:00 PM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not
> be removed until all JDBC pools have been stopped. So, yes, one
> application can be the one that starts t
PoolCleaner is a static singleton. The pool cleaner thread will not be removed
until all JDBC pools have been stopped.
So, yes, one application can be the one that starts the thread, but not
necessarily the one that stops it
Filip
> -Original Message-
> From: Osipov, M
Sources are created in the
>> context.xml file. All DataSources are cleaned up (closed) with a
>> context.xml Listener. The JDBC Pool is version 7.0.26.
>>
>> As far as my debug sessions have revealed (with attached VisualVM),
>> it does not matter how many apps you
losed) with a context.xml Listener. The JDBC
> Pool is version 7.0.26.
>
> As far as my debug sessions have revealed (with attached VisualVM), it does
> not matter how many apps you deploy the PoolCleanTimer thread is created only
> once and retained until all apps have been stopp
very likely to create a memory leak.
There is some similar thread [1] which had no real result.
I am on Tomcat 6.0.35, all DataSources are created in the context.xml file. All
DataSources are cleaned up (closed) with a context.xml Listener. The JDBC Pool
is version 7.0.26.
As far as my debug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S Ahmed,
On 3/25/12 6:57 PM, S Ahmed wrote:
> Why would you want to use a future?
>
> Say in a web application, I can't really think of a reason why I
> would use the future (asych) connection retrieval pattern. The #
> of connections is always fix
rn up pool logging to FINE. When a connection attempt times out or
fails it logs at this level.
3. Possibly enable connect and TCP read timeouts on the mysql jdbc
driver. Per the docs they are 'infinite' by default, but I think lower
timeouts would help to detect network/firewall problems mo
Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 05:30 -0600 schrieb Terence M. Bandoian:
> Apparently, Tomcat (6.0.29) takes care of that if the
> driver is located in the Tomcat lib directory but not if it is
> located
> in web application's lib directory.
Tomcat does not take care afaik - the classloader is not t
gt;>>> On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
>>>>>> On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
>>&
es R wrote:
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7,
when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations?
If you look in conf/catalina.properties, you'll see the order
es R wrote:
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7,
when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations?
If you look in conf/catalina.properties, you'll see the order
bottom you
call .get(), is that possible?
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2012/3/26 S Ahmed :
> > Is the jdbc pool somehow married to tomcat or can I use it with other
> > containers potentially? (
>
> 1. You certainly can use it with other contain
2012/3/26 S Ahmed :
> Is the jdbc pool somehow married to tomcat or can I use it with other
> containers potentially? (
1. You certainly can use it with other containers.
But it depends on Tomcat version of logging library (That is
tomcat-juli.jar). You have to copy that jar as well.
&
3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>>>>> From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
>>>>>>> Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
>>>>>>> Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7,
>>>&
On 1:59 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 23 Mar 2012, at 21:59, David Kerber wrote:
On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
On 23 Mar 2012, at 21:59, David Kerber wrote:
> On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
>> On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote:
>>> On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>>> From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
>>&g
On 3/23/2012 6:51 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7,
when I&#
On 1:59 PM, David kerber wrote:
On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7,
when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA
On 3/23/2012 11:19 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7,
when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations?
If you look in
> From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
> Subject: jdbc driver location in TC 7
> Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7,
> when I'm using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations?
If you look in conf/catalina.properties, you'll
Kind of related to the upgrade issue I ran into yesterday:
Where is the recommended location for jdbc driver jars in TC7, when I'm
using separate CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE locations? If it makes a
difference, I am not using tomcat's connection pooling; it's handled
s required. You could try
1. Use IP instead of host name in your jdbc URL
2. Configure the JRE to not cache dns lookups, (network.properties)
The error you see tells you that:
1. The pool doesn't have any idle established connections idle=0
2. The pool doesn't have any connections used b
up in the logs.
5. Restore vpn connection
6. Check if pool creates new connections, which it does not.
I also upgraded to the latest pool available in maven
central: tomcat-jdbc-7.0.26.jar
I understand this could still be a connection leak in my application. But
the new pool version logs an
there is a loop
somewhere that when it fails it just retries and retries, logAbandoned will
show that though.
Filip
- Original Message -
> From: "Colin Ingarfield"
> To: "Tomcat Users List"
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:06:14 AM
> Subject: Re: how t
iginal Message -
> > From: "Colin Ingarfield"
> > To: "Tomcat Users List"
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 10:11:43 AM
> > Subject: Re: how to enable debug logging for Tomcat jdbc pool (Tomcat
> 6.0.32)
> >
> > I added the 3 abandon
ng your max connection pool size to
> "1": you'll find potential deadlocks that way, too.
>
>
> http://blog.christopherschultz.net/index.php/2009/03/16/properly-handling-pooled-jdbc-connections/
>
> - -chris
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG
ion would have failed
> quickly if all the connections we're being incorrectly held up.
In development, I recommend setting your max connection pool size to
"1": you'll find potential deadlocks that way, too.
http://blog.christopherschultz.net/index.php/2009/03/16/prop
> To: "Tomcat Users List"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 10:11:43 AM
> Subject: Re: how to enable debug logging for Tomcat jdbc pool (Tomcat 6.0.32)
>
> I added the 3 abandoned settings but I don't see any indication in
> the
> tomcat log that connections are
tries the operation. And that is the only way to get around the
> problem (assuming my assumption is correct)
>
>
> Filip
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Colin Ingarfield"
> > To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:30:4
g
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:30:46 AM
> Subject: Re: how to enable debug logging for Tomcat jdbc pool (Tomcat 6.0.32)
>
> My configuration:
>
> name="jdbc/cdb.mysql"
> defaultAutoCommit="false"
> driverClassName="com.mysql.j
My configuration:
I have testOnBorrow and validationQuery set as you suggest, so I do not
think that is the issue.
Thanks,
Colin
- Original Message -
> From: "Colin Ingarfield"
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:25:54 AM
> Subject: Re: how to enable debug logging for Tomcat jdbc pool (Tomcat 6.0.32)
>
> iirc I copied the version number from th
@tomcat.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:23:02 AM
> Subject: Re: how to enable debug logging for Tomcat jdbc pool (Tomcat 6.0.32)
>
> Hello Filip,
>
> Over the weekend my application appears to have lost connectivity to
> its
> MySQL server. At that point in my
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using the new Tomcat jdbc pool (1.1.0.1) with Tomcat 6.0.32, Ubuntu
>> x86_64. I would like to increase the logging from the pool to try and
>> chase down connection timeouts.
>
>Where your "1.1.0.1" comes from?
>
on pool and try
to see what's going on. I couldn't find any log output from the pool in
my logs or in the Tomcat logs directory.
My application uses Spring JDBC and Spring's @Transaction annotations so
my code does not directly interact with the DataSource or the jdbc
Connections.
I
2012/3/19 Colin Ingarfield :
> Hello,
>
> I'm using the new Tomcat jdbc pool (1.1.0.1) with Tomcat 6.0.32, Ubuntu
> x86_64. I would like to increase the logging from the pool to try and
> chase down connection timeouts.
Where your "1.1.0.1" comes from?
It is not
Colin Ingarfield [mailto:colin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 1:51 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: how to enable debug logging for Tomcat jdbc pool (Tomcat 6.0.32)
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using the new Tomcat jdbc pool (1.1.0.1) with Tomcat 6.0.32, Ubuntu
>
Hello,
I'm using the new Tomcat jdbc pool (1.1.0.1) with Tomcat 6.0.32, Ubuntu
x86_64. I would like to increase the logging from the pool to try and
chase down connection timeouts.
I added the following line to $CATALINA_BASE/conf/logging.properties:
org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.level=FINE
ConnectionHandler.**
>> process(AbstractProtocol.java:**579)
>> at
>> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.**JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.**
>> run(JIoEndpoint.java:307)
>> at
>> java.util.concurrent.**ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.**
>> runTask(ThreadPool
little more detail we have enabled all the new Manager roles while
we test this issue.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Jonathan
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-view-Tomcat-JDBC-pool-properties-in-Tomcat-7
On 3/3/2012 10:50 AM, Brooke Hedrick wrote:
On Mar 3, 2012 11:48 AM, "Brooke Hedrick"
wrote:
On Mar 3, 2012 11:35 AM, "Caldarale, Charles R"<
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
From: Brooke Hedrick [mailto:brooke.t.hedr...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Tomcat JDBC Pool
Subject: Re: [OT] Using tomcat7-maven-plugin- 2.0-beta-1:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Name jdbc is not bound in this Context
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guofeng,
On 3/7/12 5:32 AM, Guofeng Zhang wrote:
> name="jdbc/iviewDS" testQuery="select count(*) from T_ROLE&q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Amit,
On 3/8/12 11:55 AM, Amit wrote:
> Enabling debug level would add some extra handling
>
> 1. We use slf4j & logback as our logging framework & tomcat uses
> jul logging. We would have to add jul-to-slf4j.jar to direct the
> jul messages to logba
Thanks guys. I will file a new bug with the details you provided about it
exposing too many get methods.
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-view-Tomcat-JDBC-pool-properties-in-Tomcat-7-tp4557182p4559731.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User
alled by the MBeanDumper, and thus probably should
>> be exposed as an attribute through an MBean.
>>
> You meant "should not be exposed", right ?
Yes, I did.
I checked the mbeans-deacriptor in trunk and there seems to be no
mention of "connection" or "XAC
;> I am using tomcat-jdbc.jar and tomcat-juli.jar from version
> >>>> 7.0.26.
> >>>>
> >>>>> I don't see any place in setupConnection where an exception is
> >>>>> swallowed, do you?
> >>>>>
> >>&g
SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Amit,
>>>
>>> On 3/7/12 12:12 AM, amit shah wrote:
>>>> I am using tomcat-jdbc.jar and tomcat-juli.jar from version
>>>> 7.0.26.
>>>>
>>>>> I don't see
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
On 3/8/12 10:19 AM, hodgesz wrote:
Well the exact same Spring code doesn't throw an exception with
6.0.29 version of Tomcat.
See Rainer's note in the bug you filed: those properties didn't exist
in 6.0.x.
I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
On 3/8/12 10:19 AM, hodgesz wrote:
> Well the exact same Spring code doesn't throw an exception with
> 6.0.29 version of Tomcat.
See Rainer's note in the bug you filed: those properties didn't exist
in 6.0.x.
> I have already entered a bug
n't need it now so that doesn't seem like
the solution here.
-Jonathan
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-view-Tomcat-JDBC-pool-properties-in-Tomcat-7-tp4557182p4558561.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
So, ConnectionPool.getProxyConstructor definitely makes a decision
about what interfaces to expose when generating a proxy for a
PooledConnection (sorry for the word-wrapping):
public Constructor getProxyConstructor(boolean xa) throws
N
a bug to me.
The problem is I'm not sure if that's a bug in Tomcat's code or in
Spring's code, since both code is involved in both stack traces.
I would probably look first in the jdbc-pool code to see if a Proxy is
being created that does not include all the proper interfaces
(ob
gt; On 3/7/12 12:12 AM, amit shah wrote:
> > > I am using tomcat-jdbc.jar and tomcat-juli.jar from version
> > > 7.0.26.
> > >
> > >> I don't see any place in setupConnection where an exception is
> > >> swallowed, do you?
> &
)
... 30 more
To add a little more detail we have enabled all the new Manager roles while
we test this issue.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Jonathan
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-view-Tomcat-JDBC
version
> > 7.0.26.
> >
> >> I don't see any place in setupConnection where an exception is
> >> swallowed, do you?
> >>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/Conne
On 8 Mar 2012, at 02:26, hodgesz wrote:
> In 6.0.29 we used the Spring MBeanExporter to export the Tomcat JDBC pool
> properties.
>
> We are still able to view them with this approach in JConsole and using the
> JMXProxy Servlet with Tomcat 7.
>
> However since Tomcat JDBC p
In 6.0.29 we used the Spring MBeanExporter to export the Tomcat JDBC pool
properties.
We are still able to view them with this approach in JConsole and using the
JMXProxy Servlet with Tomcat 7.
However since Tomcat JDBC pool is part of Tomcat 7 are its properties
exposed without using the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guofeng,
On 3/7/12 5:32 AM, Guofeng Zhang wrote:
> name="jdbc/iviewDS" testQuery="select count(*) from T_ROLE"
You might want to use a simper testQuery (like "SELECT 1 FROM DUAL",
for instance). Some RDBMS engines
t; http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/ConnectionPool.java?view=markup
>
>>
> Have a look at the public boolean validate(int
> validateAction,String sql) method in PooledConnection class line no
> - 445.
> The
file I mean nothing in src\main\tomcatconf ) ?
Thanks,
2012/3/7 Guofeng Zhang :
> Hi,
>
> I try tomcat7-maven-plugin/2.0-beta-1. When I use "mvn tomcat7:run" to launch
> my app, I got:
> javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name jdbc is not bound in this Context
>
&g
Hi,
I try tomcat7-maven-plugin/2.0-beta-1. When I use "mvn tomcat7:run" to launch
my app, I got:
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name jdbc is not bound in this Context
I configured the datatsource as global naming datasource in server.xml,
The server.xml is copied t
> There's nothing like chasing your tail for a few days on a mailing list.
>
> - -chris
ok, ok ...it was my fault ... sorry :-/
Regards
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mai
Comments below.
Thanks,
Amit.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Amit,
>
> On 3/6/12 4:46 AM, amit shah wrote:
> > Hello, I am using the tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Amit,
On 3/6/12 4:46 AM, amit shah wrote:
> Hello, I am using the tomcat jdbc pool independently in my
> application and frequently I faced a NullPointerException with the
> below stack trace
>
601 - 700 of 1690 matches
Mail list logo
