Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 3/10/2009 9:27 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? However, since I'll have to use Authentication (see my other post), thus needing SSL, I guess I

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-13 Thread Gregor Schneider
Chris, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: Another potential reason for using separate Connectors is to (somewhat) guarantee availability of each of your webapps. If you have an Executor with 100 threads available, a single webapp('s users)

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-12 Thread Gregor Schneider
Mark, I guess I didn't phrase properly since you seem to have misunderstood me: I want a *separation* of the hosts. Alias, as I understand it, helps to run multiple domains within the same IP-adress. Therefore, I'm using multiple host-elements (one for each IP/domain-combination) to separate

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Thomas
Gregor Schneider wrote: Mark, I guess I didn't phrase properly since you seem to have misunderstood me: I want a *separation* of the hosts. Alias, as I understand it, helps to run multiple domains within the same IP-adress. I thought the issue was that you wanted to make sure the name and

RE: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-12 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? I want a *separation* of the hosts. Alias, as I understand it, helps to run multiple domains within the same IP-adress. No, it can be used for different things. In this case, the Alias simply allows

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-12 Thread Robert Koberg
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Gregor Schneider wrote: Mark, I guess I didn't phrase properly since you seem to have misunderstood me: I want a *separation* of the hosts. Alias, as I understand it, helps to run multiple domains within the same IP-adress. I thought the

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-12 Thread Gregor Schneider
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote: From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? I want a *separation* of the hosts. Alias, as I understand it, helps to run multiple domains within the same IP

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-11 Thread Mark Thomas
Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? However, since I'll have to use Authentication (see my other post), thus needing SSL, I guess I have to setup a HTTP-Connector for each of them. Depends on how much

Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-10 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi guys, just a quickone: I'm having a server here running 4 different domains, luckily having a bunch of IP-adresses on said host available. On my test-server, I just had one IP-adress, thus I created one HTTP-Connector (without the adress-param), below an Engine and inside the Engine 4

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-10 Thread André Warnier
Gregor Schneider wrote: Hi guys, just a quickone: I'm having a server here running 4 different domains, luckily having a bunch of IP-adresses on said host available. On my test-server, I just had one IP-adress, thus I created one HTTP-Connector (without the adress-param), below an Engine and

RE: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-10 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? So if you have 4 Connectors, you will be having 4 independent number of min and max threads, and 4 independent settings for the number of TCP connections to be queued up. On Tomcat 6, you can use an Executor

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-10 Thread Gregor Schneider
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote: From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? So if you have 4 Connectors, you will be having 4 independent number of min and max threads, and 4 independent settings

RE: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-10 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? So it seems there are no catches if I'm setting up the server the lazy way - correct? My only concern is if some client started using an IP address rather than the name associated with that address

Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-10 Thread Gregor Schneider
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote: From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? My only concern is if some client started using an IP address rather than the name associated with that address

RE: Lazy Virtual Hosting?

2009-03-10 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Subject: Re: Lazy Virtual Hosting? However, since I'll have to use Authentication (see my other post), thus needing SSL, I guess I have to setup a HTTP-Connector for each of them. Depends on how much separation you want. If you're