Re: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-02 Thread Pid
On 02/09/2010 01:47, Len Popp wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 19:08, Konstantin Kolinko > wrote: >> Have you ever searched the list archives? > > Good idea... > http://tomcat.markmail.org/search/?q=hijack#query:hijack%20list%3Aorg.apache.tomcat.users+page:1+state:facets > More than 700 messages!

Re: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread Len Popp
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 19:08, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > Have you ever searched the list archives? Good idea... http://tomcat.markmail.org/search/?q=hijack#query:hijack%20list%3Aorg.apache.tomcat.users+page:1+state:facets More than 700 messages! Really, is there a reason they all need to be sent

Re: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread Wesley Acheson
> Have you ever searched the list archives? Hijacked threads are > harmful. I appreciate those complaints being on the list, so that I > won't waste my time replying (and increasing the mess). > In that case the answer is yes. I should read this in a threaded client. -

Re: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/9/2 Len Popp : > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:06, Christopher Schultz > wrote: >> In the end, it's mostly up to the user's own personal preference which >> way things should go. Those of us whose mail clients respect the >> thread-id in the SMTP headers can see immediately when someone hijacks a

RE: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread George Sexton
--Original Message- > From: Len Popp [mailto:len.p...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:28 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: META - Thread Hijacking > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:06, Christopher Schultz > wrote: > > In the end, it's mostl

Re: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread Len Popp
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:06, Christopher Schultz wrote: > In the end, it's mostly up to the user's own personal preference which > way things should go. Those of us whose mail clients respect the > thread-id in the SMTP headers can see immediately when someone hijacks a > thread. Those folks have

Re: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wesley, On 9/1/2010 5:39 PM, Wesley Acheson wrote: > I've seen complaints about thread hijacking but I always see them as > different threads in my mail client. (Gmail) should I be using > different software to subscribe to the list I think I've repli

RE: META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com] > Subject: META - Thread Hijacking > I've seen complaints about thread hijacking but I always see > them as different threads in my mail client. Newer e-mail readers tend to ignore much of the SMTP header information and

META - Thread Hijacking

2010-09-01 Thread Wesley Acheson
I've seen complaints about thread hijacking but I always see them as different threads in my mail client. (Gmail) should I be using different software to subscribe to the list I think I've replied to them (threadjacks) a few times :S Wes ---