James,
On 7/24/24 18:07, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
So what jobs are in the subsystem? You said "the Catalina job and its
associated JVM job" but to me those are just a single job/process. Are
they separate things in the IBM world?
Thanks for your insights, Mr. Schultz. And yours, too, Herr H
So what jobs are in the subsystem? You said "the Catalina job and its
associated JVM job" but to me those are just a single job/process. Are
they separate things in the IBM world?
Thanks for your insights, Mr. Schultz. And yours, too, Herr Hoffmann.
On an IBM Midrange box (AS/400, iSeries, wha
James,
On 7/23/24 16:54, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
On 7/23/24 1:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Thomas,
Uh, "James." Thomas was someone who answered earlier.
:|
2. What has to fit into that 7GiB private memory pool? Does it include
any OS, or is it just the JVM itself?
On an IBM Midr
On 7/23/24 1:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Thomas,
Uh, "James." Thomas was someone who answered earlier.
2. What has to fit into that 7GiB private memory pool? Does it include
any OS, or is it just the JVM itself?
On an IBM Midrange box, a private memory pool simply provides jobs in a
Thomas,
On 7/23/24 13:44, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We still have a chronic Tomcat crashing problem at one of our
installations.
The weirdest thing about this is that while this is certainly *one* of
our heaviest-usage installations, it's not *the* heaviest.
We alre
Hello James,
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: James H. H. Lampert
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Juli 2024 19:44
> An: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion l...@lists.midrange.com>; Tomcat Users List
> Betreff: Problems with the most problematic of our Tomcat inst
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We still have a chronic Tomcat crashing problem at one of our installations.
The weirdest thing about this is that while this is certainly *one* of
our heaviest-usage installations, it's not *the* heaviest.
We already have Tomcat shutting down and restarting itself every
Holger,
On 3/19/24 04:46, info@klawitter.de wrote:
dang! I missed that while checking the changelog.
Thanks for pointing out.
I'm curious about CHIPS. It's still considered experimental and,
honestly, every web browser on the planet is poised to use the
equivalent of "partitioned cookies
Hi Mark,
dang! I missed that while checking the changelog.
Thanks for pointing out.
Regards,
Holger
Mark Thomas wrote (at 2024-03-18 17:03 +):
> On 18/03/2024 15:16, info@klawitter.de wrote:
>
> > What am I doing wrong here? (Tomcat 9.0.82)
>
> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-9.0-doc/
On 18/03/2024 15:16, info@klawitter.de wrote:
What am I doing wrong here? (Tomcat 9.0.82)
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-9.0-doc/changelog.html
Search for "partitioned"
The problem is you are using Tomcat 9.0.82. Support for a default
partitioned attribute wasn't added until 9.0.85.
Hi there,
I have to make my webapp complying to CHIPS. For this I am
trying to configure the CookieProcessor to allow partitioned cookies.
For this I added a CookieProcessor directive to the context.xml
like this:
However tomcat complains about this with
[Catalina-utility-1] org.apache.tomca
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
After upgrading the machine (brand new VM) from FreeBSD 12.X to
14.0-RELEASE, OpenJDK 8 to OpenJdk 21 and Tomcat 9.0.35 to 9.0.84
(copied the existing server.xml over) I am having problems with a
servlet that has worked in the past that uploaded images from one app
(which
Aryeh,
a general advice: The current Tomcat ports on FreeBSD are a bit unfortunate
since they don't motivate to use separate catalina bases. I do not recommend
using it as-is. Leverage the multi-instance options provided by its rc script
to split out and the do:
> tomcat_{name}_enable="YES"
> t
чт, 11 янв. 2024 г. в 23:08, Aryeh Friedman :
> [...]
> Original code:
>
> Decode form
> Save file to /tmp/[sessId]/[filename]
> Move file from above to images app and rename the file from
> /tmp/[sessId][filename] to [webapp dir]/images/[doc]/1.jpg (simelar if
> it is org policy or a system wide o
r upgrading the machine (brand new VM) from FreeBSD 12.X to
> > 14.0-RELEASE, OpenJDK 8 to OpenJdk 21 and Tomcat 9.0.35 to 9.0.84
> > (copied the existing server.xml over) I am having problems with a
> > servlet that has worked in the past that uploaded images from one app
> >
Aryeh,
On 1/10/24 17:48, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
After upgrading the machine (brand new VM) from FreeBSD 12.X to
14.0-RELEASE, OpenJDK 8 to OpenJdk 21 and Tomcat 9.0.35 to 9.0.84
(copied the existing server.xml over) I am having problems with a
servlet that has worked in the past that uploaded
After upgrading the machine (brand new VM) from FreeBSD 12.X to
14.0-RELEASE, OpenJDK 8 to OpenJdk 21 and Tomcat 9.0.35 to 9.0.84
(copied the existing server.xml over) I am having problems with a
servlet that has worked in the past that uploaded images from one app
(which is re-installed on each
ct: Re: Sharing catalina home among tomcat machines in a load
> balanced environment gives problems with log files
>
> Jon,
>
> On 10/10/23 14:26, Mcalexander, Jon J. wrote:
> > Could you have separate work folders but have the appbase be the in
> > the shared f
10, 2023 5:59 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sharing catalina home among tomcat machines in a load
balanced environment gives problems with log files
Mark,
On 10/10/23 06:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
Running multiple instances of Tomcat from the same CATALINA_BASE is
totally unsupported.
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 5:59 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sharing catalina home among tomcat machines in a load
> balanced environment gives problems with log files
>
> Mark,
>
> On 10/10/23 06:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Running multip
On 10/10/2023 13:03, Mark Linton wrote:
Hello Tomcat users.
Is there a forum (like a webpage that we can search for previous
questions?)...
lists.apache.org
I am experiencing an issue with logging on to the manager and hosts
webpage(s).
What issue?
Please see the tomcat-users.xml attache
Hello Tomcat users.
Is there a forum (like a webpage that we can search for previous
questions?)...
I am experiencing an issue with logging on to the manager and hosts
webpage(s).
Please see the tomcat-users.xml attached:
*Tomcat-users.xml*
http://tomcat.apache.org/xml";
xmlns:xs
Hello,
Il giorno mar, 10/10/2023 alle 06.59 -0400, Christopher Schultz ha scritto:
> Mark,
>
> On 10/10/23 06:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Running multiple instances of Tomcat from the same CATALINA_BASE is
> > totally unsupported. This isn't one of those "We don't technically
> > support that bu
Mark,
On 10/10/23 06:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
Running multiple instances of Tomcat from the same CATALINA_BASE is
totally unsupported. This isn't one of those "We don't technically
support that but you should be OK situations". This is one of the rare
"You do that and it *will* break and you wil
Running multiple instances of Tomcat from the same CATALINA_BASE is
totally unsupported. This isn't one of those "We don't technically
support that but you should be OK situations". This is one of the rare
"You do that and it *will* break and you will be on your own when it
does." situations.
Hello Peter,
Il giorno mar, 10/10/2023 alle 11.21 +0200, l...@kreuser.name ha scritto:
> Guiseppe,
>
> did you consider the separation of CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE. Look
> at the RUNNING.txt file that describes the purpose...
>
> Plus some symbolic links that have the really common files l
have both tomcat use it. In a test installation I only have
some problems with log files, since they are shared and the tomcats write
concurrently to the same files, overlapping their text.
I set the property java.util.logging.config.file to a per tomcat properties
file, and this works for some of
directory and have both tomcat use it. In a test installation I only have
some problems with log files, since they are shared and the tomcats write
concurrently to the same files, overlapping their text.
I set the property java.util.logging.config.file to a per tomcat properties
file, and this works for
James,
On 9/25/23 12:17, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
I probably asked the question before, but does Tomcat have any problems
with not having a ROOT context?
I always run with a ROOT context just to be able to do things like
provide custom responses with clients request
/no-such-app
On 25/09/2023 17:17, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
I probably asked the question before, but does Tomcat have any problems
with not having a ROOT context?
None I am aware of although there may be some edge cases. Past
precedence is that any such edge cases would be treated as bugs and
fixed in
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:20 PM James H. H. Lampert
wrote:
>
> I probably asked the question before, but does Tomcat have any problems
> with not having a ROOT context?
Not that I can tell and have been running in this mode for about 5 years now.
--
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Develo
I probably asked the question before, but does Tomcat have any problems
with not having a ROOT context?
--
James H. H. Lampert
Touchtone Corporation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 12/01/2023 10:50, Simon Matter wrote:
On 12/01/2023 05:08, Fedor Makarov wrote:
lundase and vvsguiden webapps used on different domains
My recommendation would be to configure Tomcat for virtual hosting as
well. [1]
For example, configure the following hosts in the local hosts file:
lund
> On 12/01/2023 05:08, Fedor Makarov wrote:
>>
>> lundase and vvsguiden webapps used on different domains
>
> My recommendation would be to configure Tomcat for virtual hosting as
> well. [1]
>
> For example, configure the following hosts in the local hosts file:
>
> lundase-local
> vvsguiden-local
On 12/01/2023 05:08, Fedor Makarov wrote:
lundase and vvsguiden webapps used on different domains
My recommendation would be to configure Tomcat for virtual hosting as
well. [1]
For example, configure the following hosts in the local hosts file:
lundase-local
vvsguiden-local
Then the http
lundase and vvsguiden webapps used on different domains
<-->ServerName new.vvsguiden-dev.gridnine.com
<-->ServerAlias localhost
<-->ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost
<-->DocumentRoot /var/www/html
<-->RewriteEngine on
<-->ProxyPreserveHost on
Ord
On 10/01/2023 04:37, Fedor Makarov wrote:
Also I tried to write a filter to manually redirect, but tomcat intercepts the
request before it gets into the filter. Can I disable this behavior for tomcat
and do it manually?
That isn't the way to solve this problem. The problem is in the reverse
Also I tried to write a filter to manually redirect, but tomcat intercepts the
request before it gets into the filter. Can I disable this behavior for tomcat
and do it manually?
>Понедельник, 9 января 2023, 11:43 +03:00 от Fedor Makarov
>:
>
>
>
>We have to webapps lundase and vvsguiden th
Fedor,
On 1/9/23 03:43, Fedor Makarov wrote:
We have to webapps lundase and vvsguiden therefore, the options you
have suggested do not look applicable
Why not?
on debug I saw that RequestURI in request looks like
lundase/lundase/...
Probably because of this:
>>> RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://
We have to webapps lundase and vvsguiden therefore, the options you have
suggested do not look applicable on debug I saw that RequestURI in request
looks like lundase/lundase/...
>Вторник, 27 декабря 2022, 22:06 +03:00 от Christopher Schultz
>:
>
>Fedor,
>
>On 12/27/22 05:55, Fedor Makarov
We have to webapps lundase and vvsguiden therefore, the options you have
suggested do not look applicable on debug I saw that RequestURI in request
looks like lundase/lundase/...
27.12.2022, 22:07, Christopher Schultz < mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net
ch...@christopherschultz.net >
Fedor, O
Fedor,
On 12/27/22 05:55, Fedor Makarov wrote:
proxy for local environment we use the js conf:
proxy: {
'/api/': {
target: 'http://localhost:8080/',
changeOrigin: false,
},
'/': {
target: 'http://localhost:8080/lundase',
changeOrigin: false
}
}
"
import="com.gridnine.platform.common.lundase.model.content.*"
%><%
MetaVO meta = SiteMetadataHelper.getStaticMeta(MainSitePage.LUNDA_ONLINE);
%>
>Вторник, 27 декабря 2022, 13:42 +03:00 от Mark Thomas :
>
>
>On 27/12/2022 06:25, Fedo
On 27/12/2022 06:25, Fedor Makarov wrote:
Tomcat 9.0.65
Hello I have some problems with redirects by requests without trailing slashes.
When I try to get to the page for example: "about/page" tomcat understands that it is necessary to add a slash and adds it, however, he als
Tomcat 9.0.65
Hello I have some problems with redirects by requests without trailing slashes.
When I try to get to the page for example: "about/page" tomcat understands that
it is necessary to add a slash and adds it, however, he also adds the name of
the root folder to this, th
Hello,
its already addressed here: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66277
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Sita Geßner
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2022 08:57
> An: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Betreff: problems with inclusion of jsp files since Tomcat 9.
Hello,
since Tomcat 9.0.67 we have the following problem. With tomcat 9.0.65
everything works fine without a change.
most of our jsp-files are placed in a subdirectory and include the following
line.
<%@ include file="../../includes/taglib.jsp" %>
the taglib.jsp contains the following content
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:57 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> jstack isn't working? Hmm. Make sure that your jstack and Java binary
> are the same version. If you are a different user you might have to
> elevate privileges and/or use "jstack -F".
>
I have tried all
Mladen,
On 12/16/20 13:32, Mladen Adamović wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 7:07 PM Christopher Schultz
mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>> wrote:
I think your scripts will restart Tomcat even when it's not necessary.
Hm, is this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5816239/how-do-i-forc
I have just updated to the latest Tomcat 9.0.41
It seems that the problem doesn't appear anymore. If I get it reappeared,
I'll post new details to the Tomcat dev mailing list.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:56 AM Mladen Adamović
wrote:
> I have these problems again. To narrow it down I have done th
I have these problems again. To narrow it down I have done the following:
- tested with the latest JDK8 - problem exists
- it exists in both Apr connector and Nio2 connector
- did log JVM Garbage Collector details - it's not due to Garbage collector
Christopher (or anyone else), if we had 1570 req
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 7:07 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> I think your scripts will restart Tomcat even when it's not necessary.
>
Hm, is this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5816239/how-do-i-force-tomcat-to-reload-trusted-certificates
the way to reload the
Mladen,
On 12/16/20 10:12, Mladen Adamović wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:27 PM Christopher Schultz
mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>> wrote:
> We have a self-monitoring script which runs on server and when
the server
> is not working properly it does a log save and the serv
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:27 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> > We have a self-monitoring script which runs on server and when the server
> > is not working properly it does a log save and the service restart.
>
> How do you detect this state? Just make a request and
Mladen,
On 12/16/20 04:10, Mladen Adamović wrote:
We have experienced a large number of HTTP requests with the problem "No
data received".
this is the example using curl:
--2020-12-15 15:38:13--
https://www.numbeo.com/admin/DownloadLastDbBackupServlet?numbeoPass=xxx
Loaded CA certificate '/etc/s
On 3/28/18 11:29 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Phil,
>
> On 3/27/18 1:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 3/26/18 10:28 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >> Shawn,
> >>
> >> On 3/25/18 12:17 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> >>> On 3/24/2018 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Regarding your configuration:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shawn,
On 3/27/18 8:41 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> So now I have one person telling me that removeAbandoned DOES
> close connections, and another saying that it does NOT close
> connections. Is there a conflict here, or are both of these
> statements
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Phil,
On 3/27/18 1:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/26/18 10:28 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Shawn,
>>
>> On 3/25/18 12:17 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>>> On 3/24/2018 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Regarding your configuration: >>> auth="Contai
On 3/27/18 5:41 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/27/2018 11:03 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Not exactly, if what you are using is the DBCP pool. To see the
> The factory in use right now is
> "org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory". Information
> gathered previously in this thread told me
On 3/27/2018 11:03 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Not exactly, if what you are using is the DBCP pool. To see the
The factory in use right now is
"org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory". Information
gathered previously in this thread told me that this is DBCP code,
repackaged into the tom
On 3/26/18 10:28 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Shawn,
>
> On 3/25/18 12:17 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> > On 3/24/2018 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> Regarding your configuration: >> auth="Container"
> >> factory="org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory"
> >> driverClassName="com.mysq
On 26.03.2018 23:36, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/26/2018 2:39 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
Just a question, more to satisfy my curiosity : when you have these
hundreds of "pending" connections, in what state are they, TCP/IP-wise ?
Not sure where you got "pending". I don't recall mentioning
On 3/26/2018 2:39 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> Just a question, more to satisfy my curiosity : when you have these
> hundreds of "pending" connections, in what state are they, TCP/IP-wise ?
Not sure where you got "pending". I don't recall mentioning anything
like that.
The TCP state is ES
Hi.
A question at the end.
On 26.03.2018 22:01, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/26/2018 11:28 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The pool doesn't kill abandoned connections. It simply removes them
from the pool. Otherwise, you're right: you'd have torches and
pitchforks everywhere.
That is a key piece o
On 3/26/2018 11:28 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> The pool doesn't kill abandoned connections. It simply removes them
> from the pool. Otherwise, you're right: you'd have torches and
> pitchforks everywhere.
That is a key piece of information. And it should have perhaps been
obvious from the de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shawn,
On 3/25/18 12:17 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/24/2018 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Regarding your configuration: > auth="Container"
>> factory="org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory"
>> driverClassName="com.mysql.jdbc.Drive
Hi Shawn,
only some aspects answered for now, inline:
On 25.03.2018 19:31, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/25/2018 3:15 AM, Olaf Kock wrote:
* Liferay comes (optionally) bundled with Tomcat to ease
installation, however, the tomcat in there will be your own and is up
to you to upgrade. Yes, new ver
On 3/25/2018 3:15 AM, Olaf Kock wrote:
* Liferay comes (optionally) bundled with Tomcat to ease installation,
however, the tomcat in there will be your own and is up to you to
upgrade. Yes, new versions of Liferay will come with new versions of
Tomcat, but new versions of Liferay won't be relea
On 24.03.2018 05:08, Shawn Heisey wrote:
This message is long. Lots of details, a fair amount of history.
The primary Tomcat version we've got is 7.0.42. Specifically, it is
the Tomcat that's included with Liferay 6.2. This is why we haven't
attempted an upgrade even though the version we'r
On 3/24/2018 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Regarding your configuration:
Generally, that looks OK but I'd strongly recommend that you use
"autoReconnect=false" in the URL. autoReconnect is known to be
problematic with connection pools.
The removeAbandonedTimeout looks low but if all the queries
On 3/24/2018 5:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
There are two pools available.
org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory is a different pool
developed in the Tomcat project (generally called JDBC pool).
OK, so that means that the currently active config is using dbcp. The
*new* config that I'
On 24/03/18 22:28, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> The factory we have now is
> "org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory". The factory in
> the documentation, and what I put in the configuration I'm building, is
> "org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory". These are both in the
> tomcat p
On 3/24/2018 3:34 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Before we go too far, you have said:
1. You have 5 prod servers
2. They have several pools defined
3. The above is an example of a defined pool
Just above, that configuration says maxActive=60. 5 * 60 = 300
connections. And that's just for one po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shawn,
On 3/24/18 12:08 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> This message is long. Lots of details, a fair amount of history.
Thanks for the back-story and the configurations. It really helps
explain what is going on.
> Here's a redacted configuration that
On 3/24/2018 5:36 AM, Filippo Machi wrote:
Hello Shawn, about this question, are you sure that none of the webapps
running on those tomcats are connecting to the database without using the
pools configured in the context.xml? Creating other pools or performing
direct connections? That could expla
*1) I think this is the really burning question in my mind: Why is the
server opening NEW connections when there are dozens of them already open?
Does this mean that (as I suspect) all those connections are abandoned? If
so, why are they not getting cleaned up, when we have removeAbandoned set
to
This message is long. Lots of details, a fair amount of history.
The primary Tomcat version we've got is 7.0.42. Specifically, it is the
Tomcat that's included with Liferay 6.2. This is why we haven't
attempted an upgrade even though the version we're running is five years
old -- we don't wan
ok, i rebooted the linux box and no more exceptions.
before that, maybe the service stop didn't stop the 8.5.5 tomcat? so when
i tried to service start the 8.5.28 tomcat there were problems? i didn't
go hunting for processes to see. nevertheless, all seems well now.
thx!
Lou.
On Fri, Feb 23,
Lou,
Am 2018-02-23 09:25, schrieb Lou DeGenaro:
I've replaced tomcat 8.5.5 with 8.5.28. Now I see these exceptions in
catalina.out:
22-Feb-2018 21:45:42.988 INFO [main]
org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener.lifecycleEvent The APR
based
Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal
I've replaced tomcat 8.5.5 with 8.5.28. Now I see these exceptions in
catalina.out:
22-Feb-2018 21:45:42.988 INFO [main]
org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener.lifecycleEvent The APR based
Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production
environments was not foun
Can you please check the changelog for 8.5.x and see if this was fixed?
Regards,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 at 23:11, Lou DeGenaro wrote:
> From catalina.out, NPE seems bad. Other log files have NPEs too. Need a
> never version of tomcat?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lou.
>
> -
>
> 22-Feb-2018 16:37:28.599 S
>From catalina.out, NPE seems bad. Other log files have NPEs too. Need a
never version of tomcat?
Thanks.
Lou.
-
22-Feb-2018 16:37:28.599 SEVERE [http-nio-8080-exec-29]
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.endRequest Error finishing response
java.lang.NullPointerException
22-Feb-201
oblem:)
Gratitude & have a nice weekend. :)
Br/Johnny
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2017年12月22日 17:43
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: urgent problems with tomcat release 8.5.4
2017-12-22 5:28 GMT+03:00 CYAG (Johnny Chao Yang) :
>
Hello Konstantin,
This is my first time to ask questions on this site.
Thank you so much for your kindly help, it definitely solved my problem:)
Gratitude & have a nice weekend. :)
-Original Message-
> Hello team,
>
>
> Due to the tomcat 8.0 will closed to its support deadline, so we a
gent problems with tomcat release 8.5.4
2017-12-22 5:28 GMT+03:00 CYAG (Johnny Chao Yang) :
> Hello team,
>
>
> Due to the tomcat 8.0 will closed to its support deadline, so we are going to
> upgrade our tomcat version from 8.0 to 8.5.4, as Apache tomcat official
> website announc
2017-12-22 5:28 GMT+03:00 CYAG (Johnny Chao Yang) :
> Hello team,
>
>
> Due to the tomcat 8.0 will closed to its support deadline, so we are going to
> upgrade our tomcat version from 8.0 to 8.5.4, as Apache tomcat official
> website announced 8.5.x will not stop support so far, but the support t
Hello team,
Due to the tomcat 8.0 will closed to its support deadline, so we are going to
upgrade our tomcat version from 8.0 to 8.5.4, as Apache tomcat official website
announced 8.5.x will not stop support so far, but the support time decides
which tomcat version is better for us to choose a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 1/25/17 5:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/01/2017 22:11, Zigarelli, Michael wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I am unable to configure tomcat 9.0.0.M17 for http/2 support. My
>> connector for port 8443 has been uncommented and the necessary
>> cer
On 25/01/2017 22:11, Zigarelli, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am unable to configure tomcat 9.0.0.M17 for http/2 support. My connector
> for port 8443 has been uncommented and the necessary certificates were added
> to it. I am receiving this error when I start my tomcat: Jan 25, 2017 4:28:21
>
Hi,
I am unable to configure tomcat 9.0.0.M17 for http/2 support. My connector for
port 8443 has been uncommented and the necessary certificates were added to it.
I am receiving this error when I start my tomcat: Jan 25, 2017 4:28:21 PM
org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleBase handleSubClassExce
On 16/11/2016 00:47, Steve Willett wrote:
> I am trying to set up a stand-alone Tomcat server (apparently 7.0.53).
> When I set up a simple Connector on port 8443 (no specified ciphers, and
> a simple sslProtocol="TLS") using a DigiCert Certificate I can connect.
>
> However, if I test it with Qu
...@yoursportsleague.com<mailto:st...@yoursportsleague.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 05:48 PM Central Standard Time
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Problems with SSL configuration
I am trying to set up a stand-alone Tomcat server (apparently 7.0.53).
When I set up a simple Connector o
I am trying to set up a stand-alone Tomcat server (apparently 7.0.53).
When I set up a simple Connector on port 8443 (no specified ciphers, and
a simple sslProtocol="TLS") using a DigiCert Certificate I can connect.
However, if I test it with QualSys, I get an F rating because of the
accepted
Mark,
Thanks for the hint! I added the following line to my connector and it did the
trick!
ciphers="TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA, TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,
TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA, SSL_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,
SSL_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA, SSL_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CB
On 22/06/2016 16:47, James Wiley wrote:
> Hi Tomcat Users,
>
> Has anyone run into any issues supporting SSL using the JSSE Connector when
> upgrading from 7.0.68 to 7.0.69?
>
> I help maintain a web application that uses tomcat7. A recent upgrade from
> 7.0.68 to 7.0.69 has caused the tomcat7
Hi Tomcat Users,
Has anyone run into any issues supporting SSL using the JSSE Connector when
upgrading from 7.0.68 to 7.0.69?
I help maintain a web application that uses tomcat7. A recent upgrade from
7.0.68 to 7.0.69 has caused the tomcat7 instance to throw an “Error during SSL
Handshake” wi
Amit,
On 10/28/15 1:18 PM, Amit Lonkar wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response. Here is the full stack trace. I was assuming
> that my webapp would look in WEB-INF/lib for the ant jar and not in the
> Tomcat/lib. Am I incorrect ??
There must be some component that is sure it wants to use the se
Sorry for the delayed response. Here is the full stack trace. I was assuming
that my webapp would look in WEB-INF/lib for the ant jar and not in the
Tomcat/lib. Am I incorrect ??
Thx
Amit
HTTP Status 500 - Servlet execution threw an exception
type Exception report
message Servlet execution thr
M
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Amit Lonkar
> wrote:
>
> Any ideas on this one?
>
>
>> On Oct 5, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Amit Lonkar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris
>>
>> Any ideas why the Ant Task might be failing in Tomcat 8?
>> Yes the application works on a clean fresh tomcat
Amit,
On 10/16/15 3:44 PM, Amit Lonkar wrote:
> Thanks Chris
>
> Tried two scenarios
>
> 1. Removed any tomcat-*.jar files from webapp/WEB-INF/lib folder. Also moved
> ant-1.9.6.jar from webapp/WEB-INF/lib to catalina/lib. All works fine now.
>
> 2. Removed any tomcat-*.jar files from webapp/W
1 - 100 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
