On 07/03/18 12:02, Sen, Anurag wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>> Sent: 07 March 2018 17:17
>> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Tomcat Custom Connector]Private Fields in NIOEndpoint class
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: 07 March 2018 17:17
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Tomcat Custom Connector]Private Fields in NIOEndpoint class
>
> On 07/03/2018 11:05, Sen, Anurag wrote:
> > Agreed
On 07/03/2018 11:05, Sen, Anurag wrote:
Agreed, that Endpoint is protocol agnostic. My query was more in concern with
the endpoint implementations being so encapsulated, that it leaves very little
scope to extend tomcat endpoints(without actually copy-pasting the code into
the custom endpoint)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: 07 March 2018 14:54
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [Tomcat Custom Connector]Private Fields in NIOEndpoint class
>
> On 07/03/18 09:03, Sen, Anurag wrote:
> > Dear Tomcat u
On 07/03/18 09:03, Sen, Anurag wrote:
> Dear Tomcat users/dev team,
>
> I am working on porting an enterprise application from Tomcat 4.x to Tomcat
> 8.5.x.
>
> Probably you can throw some light on the problem I am facing.
> The application that I am porting has a custom protocol(inheriting
> H
bject created of type HttpServlet or some
other type within the Coyote package rather then leave it to the CoyoteAdapter
within the Catalina package.
Thanks and Regards,
Simon J.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Tomcat Custom Connector
> Date: Tue,
Hi Bill,
Thanks again for your reply. Your comments are very helpfull :) I will
definitly have other questions in the future but for now I think I can move
forward :)
Thanks again,
Simon J.> To: users@tomcat.apache.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
Tomcat Custom Connec
distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does
not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Custom Connector
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:51:35 -0700
>
> The Ada
the servlet for which the request is? or?
Thanks for any comments,
Simon J.
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> Tomcat Custom Connector> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:17:03 -0700> > AFAIK,
> there isn't a lot of documentation. But there isn&
equest is? or?
Thanks for any comments,
Simon J.
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Tomcat
> Custom Connector> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:17:03 -0700> > AFAIK, there isn't
> a lot of documentation. But there isn't that much
tried searching on
Amazon but so far I did not have much luck.
Regards,
Sim085> To: users@tomcat.apache.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
Tomcat Custom Connector> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:17:03 -0700> > AFAIK, there
isn't a lot of documentation. But there isn't
bject: Re: Tomcat
> Custom Connector> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:17:03 -0700> > AFAIK, there isn't
> a lot of documentation. But there isn't that much too > it. You need to
> implement a ProtocolHandler >
> (http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/api/org/apach
AFAIK, there isn't a lot of documentation. But there isn't that much too
it. You need to implement a ProtocolHandler
(http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/api/org/apache/coyote/ProtocolHandler.html)
This class is responsible for managing the transport (e.g. ServerSocket) and
request threa
13 matches
Mail list logo