Re: Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0 as well?

2007-03-12 Thread Peter . Henningsen
Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09.03.2007 20:49 Please respond to Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org To Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org cc Subject SPAM Re: Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0 as well? Hello, module binaries for Apache httpd 2.0

Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0 as well?

2007-03-09 Thread Peter . Henningsen
Hello, I guess everyone has heard about the security issue that was fixed in mod_jk recently. I did install the new version, but since then I see a lot of log entries from mod_jk like : jk_uri_worker_map.c (614)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, wrong parameters The Apache Log

Re: Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0 as well?

2007-03-09 Thread Rainer Jung
Hello, module binaries for Apache httpd 2.0 and 2.2 are definitely incompatible. Combining httpd 2.0 and mod_jk compiled for 2.2 will result in completely undefined behaviour! Although most modules compile unchanged from source for 2.0 and 2.2 (so does mod_jk), the resulting binary only