RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-10 Thread Karthik Nanjangude
which was never any dev delay cause. Regards karthik -Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux Karthik Nanjangude wrote: ... When

Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-10 Thread Pid
On 09/12/2009 19:26, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 1:22 PM, Pid wrote: On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote: Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP

deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Karthik Nanjangude
Hi We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux 1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start 2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request /response Why

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux Just to check: in both cases, you downloaded the same installation files from http://tomcat.apache.org and installed them? Exactly the same JVM revision on both machines

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread André Warnier
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Hi We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux 1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start 2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request

RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Karthik Nanjangude
- From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:04 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com We

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Peter Crowther
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip OK. RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB No extra applications are running when the same was executed

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Pid
On 09/12/2009 14:12, Peter Crowther wrote: 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangudekarthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip OK. RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB No extra

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread André Warnier
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs replacement Not really off the topic, if you are talking about comparisons and benchmarks.

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread David kerber
Peter Crowther wrote: ... - A much older JVM, I think - this looks like the original 1.5 release, compared to 1.5.0_18 on Linux. - The client VM rather than the server VM is running. I would expect both of these to slow down the Windows box. Especially the client vs server vm, IME. D

RE: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Karthik Nanjangude
] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux 2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread David kerber
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: Hi As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing. For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the database software will make a

Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread André Warnier
Karthik Nanjangude wrote: ... When something is in Production it really gets pickles to upgrade the Jdk /OS , Realy worried :( Karthik, generally speaking, the gurus on this list - of which I am not - tend to be sceptical about benchmarks. That is because, as Mark indicated in

Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you appear to have 2 processors in the linux machine. Or maybe three: two

Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Pid
On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So you appear to have 2

Re: [OT] deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux

2009-12-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 12/9/2009 1:22 PM, Pid wrote: On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote: Pid, On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote: [r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386