Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? Eric, On 12/30/21 19:03, Eric Robinson wrote: If I want to ignore the vendor's recommendation and try connection pooling anyway, is that something I can enable with a config file setting, or do the

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

to me soon hopefully. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz > Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 9:10 AM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? > > Eric, > > On 12/30/21 1

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

hursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? Chris, Not pooling connections will very likely negatively affect performance. When you say "they ... have an issue with connection pooling&qu

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

obinson >>> <mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM >>>> To: Tomcat Users List >>> <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>> >>>> Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This >>>&g

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

0 PM > >> To: Tomcat Users List >> <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>> > >> Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This > >> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? > >> > >> Chris, > >> > >>> Not pooling connections will

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

0, 2021 12:00 PM >> To: Tomcat Users List > <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>> >> Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This >> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? >> >> Chris, >> >>> Not pooling connections will very likely neg

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

cember 30, 2021 12:00 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? > > Chris, > > > Not pooling connections will very likely negatively affect performance. > > > > When you say "they

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This > > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? > > > > But they do not get a corresponding database instance? > > > > They do. Each tomcat ins

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

> José, > > > -Original Message- > > From: José Cornado > > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This > > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? > > > >

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

José, > -Original Message- > From: José Cornado > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:00 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? > > But they do not get a corresponding database instance?

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

But they do not get a corresponding database instance? On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:51 AM Eric Robinson wrote: > José, > > > Is this setup going to be open to the world or just a big organization? > A big > > organization would put a cap on the number of users. Then maybe they > > could divide

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Chris, > Not pooling connections will very likely negatively affect performance. > > When you say "they ... have an issue with connection pooling" do you mean > that they have a technical problem, or do you mean that there is some ill- > conceived policy against them? > > Oh, maybe they are

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Chris, > Stupid question: can your database (meaningfully) handle the number of > connections you are making to it? Let's say you have 5000 connections per > Tomcat instance to your database, and you want 500 Tomcat instances. > That means 250 database connections. If every single one of

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Stefan, > A third option could be to add something between database client and > server. Something on layer 4 like multiple HAProxy servers or simple NAT > gateways. Or more complex on layer 7 specfic products like ProxySQL or > MaxScale. They could even pool connections and reduce the load on

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

José, > Is this setup going to be open to the world or just a big organization? A big > organization would put a cap on the number of users. Then maybe they > could divide those between the tomcat instances thus the db server. > It's a SaaS solution, where each customer organization gets its own

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Mark, > > My question is, is there a better way? > > I can only think of variations on a theme. > > The ~64k limit assumes client IP, server IP and server port remain constant. > i.e. just client port is varying. > > That suggests there is a single IP for the database server and that it is >

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Hi Simon, > I guess the database is not on the Tomcat host, otherwise you could connect > via unix domain socket to avoid the limitations of TCP port numbers. > > Otherwise I think you could run a db proxy where your Tomcat clients > connect locally via unix domain socket and the proxy relays

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Eric, On 12/29/21 19:23, Eric Robinson wrote: -Original Message- From: Mark Eggers Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 6:18 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? Eric: On 12/29/2021 1:04 PM, Eric Robinson

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Eric, On 12/29/21 16:04, Eric Robinson wrote: We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server without virtualization or containerization. Each instance is executed from its own folder tree and listens on its own unique TCP port. Each instance will run code that connects

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Am 30.12.2021 um 12:24 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 29/12/2021 21:04, Eric Robinson wrote: My question is, is there a better way? I can only think of variations on a theme. The ~64k limit assumes client IP, server IP and server port remain constant. i.e. just client port is varying. That

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Is this setup going to be open to the world or just a big organization? A big organization would put a cap on the number of users. Then maybe they could divide those between the tomcat instances thus the db server. On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:24 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 29/12/2021 21:04, Eric

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

On 29/12/2021 21:04, Eric Robinson wrote: My question is, is there a better way? I can only think of variations on a theme. The ~64k limit assumes client IP, server IP and server port remain constant. i.e. just client port is varying. That suggests there is a single IP for the database

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Hi, > We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server > without virtualization or containerization. Each instance is executed from > its own folder tree and listens on its own unique TCP port. Each instance > will run code that connects to a backend database server to send

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

> Your problem seems to be in the client-to-db server side of things. Not > tomcat as a server. > In the context of this question, tomcat is the client. > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eric Robinson > wrote: > > > We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server > >

RE: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

> -Original Message- > From: Mark Eggers > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 6:18 PM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This > Tomcat+Connector/J Problem? > > Eric: > > On 12/29/2021 1:04 PM, Eric Robinson wro

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Eric: On 12/29/2021 1:04 PM, Eric Robinson wrote: We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server without virtualization or containerization. Each instance is executed from its own folder tree and listens on its own unique TCP port. Each instance will run code that

Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

Your problem seems to be in the client-to-db server side of things. Not tomcat as a server. On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eric Robinson wrote: > We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server > without virtualization or containerization. Each instance is executed from >

Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?

We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server without virtualization or containerization. Each instance is executed from its own folder tree and listens on its own unique TCP port. Each instance will run code that connects to a backend database server to send queries that

RE: Tomcat Connector issue

29, 2020 9:13 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat Connector issue I am sorry, but any ideas how to approach this? I have eliminated the possibility that the client is dropping the connection so it must be something within IIS/Win. Switching to keep_alive=true

RE: Tomcat Connector issue

his are much appreciated... George -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:42 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat Connector issue On 23/06/2020 16:35, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > On 6/23/20 11:32, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 23/06/2020

RE: Tomcat Connector issue

::jk_ajp_common.c (799): (worker-local) Header[4] [Content-Length] = [0] This is pretty standard, I can't see anything wrong... -Original Message- From: George Stanchev Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:33 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: RE: Tomcat Connector issue Thanks all

RE: Tomcat Connector issue

d... George -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:42 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat Connector issue On 23/06/2020 16:35, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > On 6/23/20 11:32, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 23/06/2020 16:20

Re: Tomcat Connector issue

On 23/06/2020 16:35, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > On 6/23/20 11:32, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 23/06/2020 16:20, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> George, >>> >>> On 6/22/20 17:13, George Stanchev wrote: We are getting HSE_REQ_SEND_RESPONSE_HEADER failed with error=87 (0x0057) on a

Re: Tomcat Connector issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 6/23/20 11:32, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 23/06/2020 16:20, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> George, >> >> On 6/22/20 17:13, George Stanchev wrote: >>> We are getting HSE_REQ_SEND_RESPONSE_HEADER failed with >>> error=87 (0x0057) on a 302

Re: Tomcat Connector issue

On 23/06/2020 16:20, Christopher Schultz wrote: > George, > > On 6/22/20 17:13, George Stanchev wrote: >> We are getting HSE_REQ_SEND_RESPONSE_HEADER failed with error=87 >> (0x0057) on a 302 redirect proxied by TC connector 1.2.46. > Windows error 0x0057 is ... "Cannot connect to

Re: Tomcat Connector issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 George, On 6/22/20 17:13, George Stanchev wrote: > We are getting HSE_REQ_SEND_RESPONSE_HEADER failed with error=87 > (0x0057) on a 302 redirect proxied by TC connector 1.2.46. Windows error 0x0057 is ... "Cannot connect to printer"??? I

Tomcat Connector issue

We are getting HSE_REQ_SEND_RESPONSE_HEADER failed with error=87 (0x0057) on a 302 redirect proxied by TC connector 1.2.46. I can see the 302 response come over from TC and it looks legit. Trace logs below. Anyone else running into a similar error or perhaps some clue as to why this can be

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

Thanks Christopher, Am 12.03.2020 um 16:11 schrieb Christopher Schultz: > The complete new default pattern is: > > > (javax\.servlet\.request\.(cipher_suite|key_size|ssl_session|X509Certifi > cate)|CERT_(ISSUER|SUBJECT|COOKIE|FLAGS|SERIALNUMBER)|HTTPS_(SERVER_SUBJ >

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Matthias, On 3/12/20 07:19, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > Am 09.03.2020 um 22:50 schrieb Christopher Schultz: >> That's not a super-secure solution. You really should specify a >> correct whitelist pattern instead of "accept all". >

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

Hi Christopher, Am 09.03.2020 um 22:50 schrieb Christopher Schultz: > That's not a super-secure solution. You really should specify a > correct whitelist pattern instead of "accept all". thanks for your comment. You are fully right, but as this seem to will be fixed with the next tomcat version,

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Matthias, On 3/9/20 09:43, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 04.03.2020 um 09:17 schrieb Martin Grigorov: >> Please read this discussion: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9f3a2ea48f2e76f7c092ea2dc4caec7

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

Am 04.03.2020 um 09:17 schrieb Martin Grigorov: > Please read this discussion: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9f3a2ea48f2e76f7c092ea2dc4caec7d15c86f7773281ef6c8cdb817%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E > > The problem and a workaround are

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

tephen > > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 15:20, Matthias Fechner wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > as tomcat version 9.0.31 has some security fixes included I tried to do > > an upgrade. > > On the IIS tomcat connector version 1.2.46 is installed

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

tomcat version 9.0.31 has some security fixes included I tried to do an upgrade. On the IIS tomcat connector version 1.2.46 is installed. As secret I use a 32 character long alpha numeric string, I name it here token. In the workers.properties I tried to define it on the load balancer line: wo

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 15:20, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > as tomcat version 9.0.31 has some security fixes included I tried to do > an upgrade. > On the IIS tomcat connector version 1.2.46 is installed. > > As secret I use a 32 character long alp

Re: Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

it works without any problems. > > I started then wireshark and had a look into the traffic coming from the > IIS. > From IIS is see a AJP13 connection with the following content in "Apache > JServ Protocol v1.3" part in wireshark: > ... > Sec-Fetch-User: ?1 >

Problem with tomcat connector in IIS using tomcat 9.0.31

Dear all, as tomcat version 9.0.31 has some security fixes included I tried to do an upgrade. On the IIS tomcat connector version 1.2.46 is installed. As secret I use a 32 character long alpha numeric string, I name it here token. In the workers.properties I tried to define it on the load

RE: loss of connection with mod_jk(tomcat connector)

Hi Rainer, I am not much aware about JkShmFile but it was working fine with tomcat connector 1.2.43, is anything I need to setup for more loggers because even I am also not getting the actual problem. Thanks and Regards, Rajendra Rathore 9922701491 -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung

Re: loss of connection with mod_jk(tomcat connector)

Hi Rajendra, Am 06.02.2019 um 12:36 schrieb Rathore, Rajendra: Hi Mark, I am stuck and due to below issue unable to update to latest tomcat connector, can you please share your finding, let me know if you need anything from my side, I also raise issue https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla

RE: loss of connection with mod_jk(tomcat connector)

Hi Mark, I am stuck and due to below issue unable to update to latest tomcat connector, can you please share your finding, let me know if you need anything from my side, I also raise issue https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63075 but there is no progress on it. Thanks and Regards

RE: loss of connection with mod_jk(tomcat connector)

Hi Mark, We configure multiple tomcat and based on the configuration start other tomcat, since one tomcat running fine but after some time it will stop communicating, this problem we face from Tomcat Connector 1.2.46 version onwards, for 1.2.43 it works fine, please let me know if I need

Re: loss of connection with mod_jk(tomcat connector)

that status was not proper means instead of 'OK' state it was > 'Awaiting..'. We are facing this issue with tomcat connector 1.2.46, it > worked with 1.2.43. I attached our log files for your reference, please > let me know if you need anything else. Logs show the Tomcat instances aren't li

Re: Insert key-store implementation into Tomcat Connector

Thank you for the information. Mark Boon On 5/2/18, 3:35 AM, "Mark Thomas" wrote: On 02/05/18 01:48, Mark Boon wrote: > In the Tomcat TLS Connecter configuration, there’s the trustManagerClassName that can be set to a Java implementation of the X509TrustManager

Re: Insert key-store implementation into Tomcat Connector

On 02/05/18 01:48, Mark Boon wrote: > In the Tomcat TLS Connecter configuration, there’s the trustManagerClassName > that can be set to a Java implementation of the X509TrustManager interface. > There’s also a configuration called keystoreFile from which it will read the > certificate-key pair

Insert key-store implementation into Tomcat Connector

In the Tomcat TLS Connecter configuration, there’s the trustManagerClassName that can be set to a Java implementation of the X509TrustManager interface. There’s also a configuration called keystoreFile from which it will read the certificate-key pair to set up the SSL connection. I was

RE: Tomcat connector settings

Chris, Thanks for all your patience and help! It's working. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 4:50 PM To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Subject: Re: Tomcat connector se

Re: Tomcat connector settings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael, On 5/5/16 3:28 PM, Michael Fox wrote: > Please confirm that to configure the passthrough with an external > HTTPS and an internal HTTP, I would set Apache to listen to SSL on > port 8443 and Tomcat on port 8080, with a line inside the

RE: Tomcat connector settings

org> Subject: Re: Tomcat connector settings -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael, On 5/2/16 10:20 AM, Michael Fox wrote: > I ultimately want to have a Tomcat application protected by our > university's system for authentication, which is SiteMinder. They &g

Re: Tomcat connector settings

ssage- From: Christopher Schultz > [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 > 9:14 PM To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Subject: > Re: Tomcat connector settings > > Michael, > > On 4/29/16 4:25 PM, Michael Fox wrote: >> I have a

RE: Tomcat connector settings

- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 9:14 PM To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Subject: Re: Tomcat connector settings -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael, On 4/29/16 4:25 PM, Michael Fox wrote: &g

Re: Tomcat connector settings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael, On 4/29/16 4:25 PM, Michael Fox wrote: > I have an Apache web server(2.4.6) which is accessible at http or > https at DNS_hostname, and a Tomcat server (9.0.0.M1)with an > application available at DNS_hostname:8080/app_name. > > I then

Tomcat connector settings

I have an Apache web server(2.4.6) which is accessible at http or https at DNS_hostname, and a Tomcat server (9.0.0.M1)with an application available at DNS_hostname:8080/app_name. I then disabled the non-SSL HTTP/1.1 connector on port 8080 and enabled HTTP/2 in the Tomcat server.xml, using the

Re: WebEx meeting invitation: Apache Tomcat: Connector Selection

The recording is now on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBSWixIwMmU Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

WebEx meeting invitation: Apache Tomcat: Connector Selection

Hello, Mark Thomas invites you to join this WebEx meeting. Apache Tomcat: Connector Selection Tuesday, 16 February 2016 20:00 | GMT Time (London, GMT) | 30 mins JOIN WEBEX MEETING https://pivotal.webex.com/pivotal/j.php?MTID=m798bd4716dcd8a555f86ee2f77f4b002 Meeting number: 644 702 847

Unable to find IIS Tomcat Connector 1.2.41 dll

I can find the 1.2.40 here: http://mirror.symnds.com/software/Apache/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/ Any idea where I can find the 1.2.41 dll? Thank you. Mitch This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com

RE: Unable to find IIS Tomcat Connector 1.2.41 dll

, February 03, 2016 3:41 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Unable to find IIS Tomcat Connector 1.2.41 dll I can find the 1.2.40 here: http://mirror.symnds.com/software/Apache/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/ Any idea where I can find the 1.2.41 dll? Thank you. Mitch

Re: Tomcat connector: mod_jk 1.2.40 in 32 bit for OS - Linux 2.6.39-400.21.1.el6uek.x86_64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Prarthana, On 5/18/15 6:18 AM, Prarthana Agwania wrote: Thanks for the response. I tried the solution you suggested, but I am getting the below error: /usr/bin/ld: unrecognised emulation mode: 32 Supported emulations: elf_x86_64 elf_i386

Re: Tomcat connector: mod_jk 1.2.40 in 32 bit for OS - Linux 2.6.39-400.21.1.el6uek.x86_64

Christopher, Thanks for the response. I tried the solution you suggested, but I am getting the below error: /usr/bin/ld: unrecognised emulation mode: 32 Supported emulations: elf_x86_64 elf_i386 i386linux elf_l1om collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [mod_jk.la] Error 1 Can you

Tomcat connector: mod_jk 1.2.40 in 32 bit for OS - Linux 2.6.39-400.21.1.el6uek.x86_64

Hi, I am looking for mod_jk 1.2.40 source/binary on 32 bit, for Linux OS to be used with Oracle Http Server build on Apache 2.2 I could not find the details anywhere on your site. Also the link for the connector which is made available on your website is on 64 bit. Hence, request you to please

Re: Tomcat connector: mod_jk 1.2.40 in 32 bit for OS - Linux 2.6.39-400.21.1.el6uek.x86_64

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Prarthana, On 5/15/15 6:09 AM, Prarthana Agwania wrote: I am looking for mod_jk 1.2.40 source/binary on 32 bit, for Linux OS to be used with Oracle Http Server build on Apache 2.2 I could not find the details anywhere on your site. Also the

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi Sandip, Am 10.01.2015 um 12:56 schrieb Sandip Gaikwad: Hi Andre/Rainer, Please find below httpd.conf file's content: I think you need to get used to the Apache web server configuration basics. For instance learn what the lines Include conf/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf and Include

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi Andre/Rainer, Please find below httpd.conf file's content: # # This is the main Apache HTTP server configuration file. It contains the # configuration directives that give the server its instructions. # See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ for detailed information. # In particular, see #

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Thanks Rainer for your help on this. I will go through apache web server documentation and get back to you if I need any help. On 10 Jan 2015 23:08, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: Hi Sandip, Am 10.01.2015 um 12:56 schrieb Sandip Gaikwad: Hi Andre/Rainer, Please find below

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi Andre, Did you look at what is in the mod_jk.log file ? Yes. Following is mod_jk log: [Thu Jan 08 09:18:24 2015] [4800:4424] [info] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3383): mod_jk/1.2.40 initialized [Thu Jan 08 09:18:25 2015] [4800:4424] [info] init_jk::mod_jk.c (3383): mod_jk/1.2.40 initialized [Thu Jan 08

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Sandip Gaikwad wrote: Hi Rainer, In addition to the comments form André: JkMount is by default only active in the vhost in which you configure it. If your Apache config contains some VirtualHost which matches your request but doesn't contain the JkMount in its ocnfig, then the rule will not

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi Rainer, In addition to the comments form André: JkMount is by default only active in the vhost in which you configure it. If your Apache config contains some VirtualHost which matches your request but doesn't contain the JkMount in its ocnfig, then the rule will not trigger. You can add

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Am 08.01.2015 um 09:45 schrieb André Warnier: Sandip Gaikwad wrote: Hi Terence, [ snip ] When i access http://localhost/jenkins/ i am getting following error: Not Found The requested URL http://jenkins/ was not found on this server. ... *httpd.conf* LoadModule jk_module

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Sandip Gaikwad wrote: Hi Terence, [ snip ] When i access http://localhost/jenkins/ i am getting following error: Not Found The requested URL http://jenkins/ was not found on this server. ... *httpd.conf* LoadModule jk_module C:/Apache24/modules/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi Terence, I removed following line *Connector port=8080 protocol=HTTP/1.1 connectionTimeout=2 redirectPort=8443 / * Replaced *Connector port=8009 protocol=AJP/1.3 redirectPort=8443/* with *Connector port=8009 protocol=AJP/1.3 redirectPort=8443 address=127.0.0.1/* . I have

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Please see inline comments from previous message. -Terence Bandoian On 1/2/2015 9:45 PM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote: On 1/1/2015 9:20 AM, Sandip Gaikwad wrote: Hi, Following are entries in files. Please let me know what is going wrong. *workers.properties* worker.list=worker1 # Set

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Any updates on this? On 3 Jan 2015 11:07, Sandip Gaikwad sandipgaikwad3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Chris, * Are you sure there are no other JkMounts?* Yes. There are no other JKMounts. * What is your DocumentRoot set to? Do you have any Alias directives that are pointing into

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sandip, On 1/3/15 12:37 AM, Sandip Gaikwad wrote: * Are you sure there are no other JkMounts?* Yes. There are no other JKMounts. * What is your DocumentRoot set to? Do you have any Alias directives that are pointing into

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

On 1/1/2015 9:20 AM, Sandip Gaikwad wrote: Hi, Following are entries in files. Please let me know what is going wrong. *workers.properties* worker.list=worker1 # Set properties for worker1 (ajp13) worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=localhost worker.worker1.port=8009

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi Chris, * Are you sure there are no other JkMounts?* Yes. There are no other JKMounts. * What is your DocumentRoot set to? Do you have any Alias directives that are pointing into CATALINA_BASE/webapps?* In which file should i look these. I haven't set them. *You don't want this: the

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sandip, On 1/1/15 10:20 AM, Sandip Gaikwad wrote: Following are entries in files. Please let me know what is going wrong. *workers.properties* worker.list=worker1 # Set properties for worker1 (ajp13) worker.worker1.type=ajp13

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi, Following are entries in files. Please let me know what is going wrong. *workers.properties* worker.list=worker1 # Set properties for worker1 (ajp13) worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=localhost worker.worker1.port=8009 worker.worker1.connection_pool_size=10

Re: Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sandip, On 1/1/15 12:19 AM, Sandip Gaikwad wrote: Could you please let me know how to block direct access to tomcat and allow access through apache http server only? I used http://

Tomcat 8, Apache 2.4, Tomcat Connector 1.2.40, Windows 7 home basic issue

Hi, Could you please let me know how to block direct access to tomcat and allow access through apache http server only? I used http:// http://www.slideshare.net/mohanraj_nagasamy/integrating-tomcat-and-apache-on-windows-presentation for reference. What indicates that each request is coming from

Re: Problem building Tomcat connector

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Casper, On 9/19/13 2:03 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Subject: Re: Problem building Tomcat connector Although it does not explicitly state

RE: Problem building Tomcat connector

...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: 18. september 2013 16:05 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Problem building Tomcat connector -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Casper, On 9/17/13 3:01 PM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote: After being away from this list for some time I’m now back for help. I

Re: Problem building Tomcat connector

connector to get tomcat (not installed yet, but think I will go for newest Tomcat 8 when time comes) and apache to communicate. Should be no problem to get these set up. I have downloaded the source and unpacked it. You are talking about the Tomcat Connector, mod_jk, right? I then do cd native

Re: Apache Tomcat Connector - configuration

On 29.07.2013 03:49, srinivas yelamanchili wrote: Hi, I am trying to configure Apache httpd talk to Tomcat From the documentation at http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html 1. Under 'Using Tomcat auto-configure' we have this line creating your

Re: The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo documentation for Apache Httpd 2.4.x and Tomcat 7

On Jul 25, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 25.07.2013 17:14, srinivas yelamanchili wrote: Hi, I installed Apache Httpd 2.4.6 and Tomcat 7.0.42 from source code (.tar.gz) on Redhat Linux and looking for documentation to enable AJP and connect Tomcat with Httpd using AJP/APR I

Re: The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo documentation for Apache Httpd 2.4.x and Tomcat 7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nick, On 7/29/13 8:59 AM, Nick Williams wrote: On Jul 25, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 25.07.2013 17:14, srinivas yelamanchili wrote: Hi, I installed Apache Httpd 2.4.6 and Tomcat 7.0.42 from source code (.tar.gz) on Redhat Linux

Re: The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo documentation for Apache Httpd 2.4.x and Tomcat 7

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nick, On 7/29/13 8:59 AM, Nick Williams wrote: On Jul 25, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 25.07.2013 17:14, srinivas yelamanchili wrote: Hi,

Re: The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo documentation for Apache Httpd 2.4.x and Tomcat 7

On 29.07.2013 17:26, Nicholas Williams wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: If it's a resources limitation, I have a publicly-accessible TeamCity server with an unlimited OpenSource license hosting Windows 7, Mac OS X

Re: The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo documentation for Apache Httpd 2.4.x and Tomcat 7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rainer, On 7/29/13 1:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 29.07.2013 17:26, Nicholas Williams wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: If it's a resources limitation, I have a

Re: The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo documentation for Apache Httpd 2.4.x and Tomcat 7

On 29.07.2013 22:36, Christopher Schultz wrote: Rainer, On 7/29/13 1:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 29.07.2013 17:26, Nicholas Williams wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: If it's a resources limitation, I have a

Apache Tomcat Connector - configuration

Hi, I am trying to configure Apache httpd talk to Tomcat From the documentation at http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html 1. Under 'Using Tomcat auto-configure' we have this line creating your workers.properties file at $TOMCAT_HOME/conf/jk/workers.properties Under

The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo documentation for Apache Httpd 2.4.x and Tomcat 7

references to Tomcat 3,4,5.5,6 but not 7. has references to Httpd 2.x in general and 2.2 specific but nothing specific to 2.4 The Apache Tomcat Connector - Webserver HowTo http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc-archive/jk2/jk

  1   2   3   4   >