Our webapp is running very slowly on one particular customer box

This is related to my query (thanks, Mr. Gregg) about "Tenured SOA." It seems that on one of our customer installations, our webapp gets into a state of running very slowly, and the dedicated subsystem it's running in is showing massive levels of page-faulting. I've compared the GC stats of

RE: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

> From: Mark Thomas > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:06 PM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever? > > On 27/10/2020 16:29, Eric Robinson wrote: > >> On 27/10/2020 15:22, Eric Robinson wrote: > > > > >>> I had switched to the NIO connector last week. Is

Re: Default Application questions

On 26/10/2020 19:37, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > I'm doing some documentation cleanup. When was the balancer app, if it > existed, removed from the ootb tomcat applications? It was in 5.0.x (5.0.15 onwards) and 5.5.x. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/balancer-howto.html

Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

On 27/10/2020 09:16, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 27/10/2020 04:43, Eric Robinson wrote: > > > >> Any changes in the Nginx configuration in the relevant timescale? >> The last change to the nginx config files was on 8/21. The first report of problems from the users in question

Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

On 27/10/2020 04:43, Eric Robinson wrote: > Any changes in the Nginx configuration in the relevant timescale? > >>> >>> The last change to the nginx config files was on 8/21. The first >>> report of problems from the users in question was on 9/16. There is >>> another set of users on a

Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

On 27/10/2020 15:22, Eric Robinson wrote: >> On 27/10/2020 09:16, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 27/10/2020 04:43, Eric Robinson wrote: >>> >>> >>> Any changes in the Nginx configuration in the relevant timescale? >> >> The last change to the nginx config files was on 8/21.

RE: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

> On 27/10/2020 09:16, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 27/10/2020 04:43, Eric Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > >> Any changes in the Nginx configuration in the relevant timescale? > >> > > The last change to the nginx config files was on 8/21. The first > report of problems from the

RE: Default Application questions

Thank you! This answered my question. Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire Jon McAlexander Infrastructure Engineer Asst Vice President Middleware Product Engineering Enterprise CIO | Platform Services | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions 8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322 MAC: F4469-010

RE: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

> On 27/10/2020 15:22, Eric Robinson wrote: > >> On 27/10/2020 09:16, Mark Thomas wrote: > >>> On 27/10/2020 04:43, Eric Robinson wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > Any changes in the Nginx configuration in the relevant timescale? > > >> > >> The last change to the nginx config

Re: mod_jk "Can not determine the proper size for pid_t" on macOS 10.15.7

Brian On 10/26/20 15:33, Paquin, Brian wrote: I’m trying to build httpd and mod_jk for the first time on a macOS 10.15.7 box. XCode 12.1 is installed and I was able to compile OpenSSL 1.1.1g. I got an error “Can not determine the proper size for pid_t” when compiling httpd (v2.4.46) with

RE: FW: HTTP2: memory filled up fast on increasing the connections to 1000/2000 (Embedded tomcat 9.0.38)

Hi all, Thanks for the update Christopher. I tried modifying our application as below i.e by adding a read Listener and processing the requests after all the data is read (onDataAvailable()) . But I can still see the StackOverFlow Error printed . AsyncContext asyncContext =

Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?

On 27/10/2020 16:29, Eric Robinson wrote: >> On 27/10/2020 15:22, Eric Robinson wrote: >>> I had switched to the NIO connector last week. Is that why the logs are >>> still >> at 0 bytes? >> >> Yes. I only added the debug logging to BIO. >> >> Somewhere in a previous thread I recommended