Great - got it working!
Thanks so much for that again!
Kimberly
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Christopher Schultz <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kimberly,
>
> Kimberly Begley wrote:
> | I was hoping to use the jsp:include tag to include the sn
you can always reopen a bug, but what I would do, is turn on debugging
for the org.apache.jasper package,
and when the error happens, the bug might lead us to more information.
Filip
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Harper, Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug 33594: ClassCastException
> From: Harper, Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bug 33594: ClassCastException compiling jsp (very
> infrequently happens)
>
> A problem just surfaced for us, which I've run down to this issue
> [https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33594]. In our
> case, the problem pres
Hello:
A problem just surfaced for us, which I've run down to this issue
[https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33594]. In our
case, the problem presents when deploying the latest version of a webapp
on Tomcat 5.5.9.
The app was modified [including changes to the subject jsp] and te
Len, you are a genius (in my kitchen anyway). That's exactly the issue. I
just checked. I had it set to reload during development, but we don't need
it anymore.
Thanks again.
Z.
Len Popp wrote:
>
> The key is this line:
> INFO: Reloading this Context has started
> It looks like the webapp i
David Rees wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Rees wrote:
> One problem I've intermittently had with clustering is that after a
> Tomcat restart (we shut down one node and it immediately restarts,
> generally within 30 seconds),
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
> > I've got a cluster in my test lab with the following configuration on
> 5.5.26:
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking at /manager/jmxproxy?qry=*:* I see the same thing on both
> > nodes (extra info
David Rees wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ronald Klop schrieb:
See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack
> wasn't read by FastAsyncSender.
> The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for
>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
> > One problem I've intermittently had with clustering is that after a
> > Tomcat restart (we shut down one node and it immediately restarts,
> > generally within 30 seconds), they two nodes
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ronald Klop schrieb:
> > See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack
> > wasn't read by FastAsyncSender.
> > The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for
> > FastAsyncSender you shoul
David Rees wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First to make sure: counting objects in general only makes sense after a
full GC. Otherwise the heap dump will contain garbage too.
Yes, I made sure the objects I was looking at had a valid GC
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First to make sure: counting objects in general only makes sense after a
> full GC. Otherwise the heap dump will contain garbage too.
Yes, I made sure the objects I was looking at had a valid GC
reference. They really wer
thanks, Chris, I'll take a look at this!
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 5:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: TC 4.1.36 stopped logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry,
Propes, Barry L wrote
Steffen Heil wrote:
It's very fast, relyable and flexible.
Agreed.
The configuration language is even turing complete...
Be aware, that it's initial configuration may be a huge step.
On debian/ubuntu you get a multi-file configuration by default, which is
good, if the package is updated.
Hi
> I would suggest investigating several different MUAs and
> deciding which one best balances the capability you need with
> the pain of configuring it. Properly setting up an MUA,
> *any* MUA, is not simple.
I agree with this, if you replace MUA with MTA...
However, my personal preferen
Its called "Harbor Goes Native"
Essentially it means that if one drops native libraries into the server, they
also run remotely if needed
by the Java application.
We using this new technology to introduce things like cool multimedia players,
and USB support, to Java.
The idea is that now one ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry,
Propes, Barry L wrote:
| all of a sudden, I've got a connection pool leak. I'll troubleshoot
| that separately from this issue, though quite honestly I'm not sure
| how it suddenly occurred, but I believe I can fix thatalthough
| what is o
David Rees wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack wasn't
read by FastAsyncSender.
The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for FastAsyncSender
you should set sendAck="fal
my logging mechanism on this "kicked in" again at some point today, but a
couple of things:
all of a sudden, I've got a connection pool leak. I'll troubleshoot that
separately from this issue, though quite honestly I'm not sure how it suddenly
occurred, but I believe I can fix thatalthough
David Rees schrieb:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack wasn't
read by FastAsyncSender.
The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for FastAsyncSender
you should set sendAck="fals
Ronald Klop schrieb:
See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack
wasn't read by FastAsyncSender.
The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for
FastAsyncSender you should set sendAck="false" on the receiving side.
Ronald.
Hi Ronald,
I saw your previous cl
David Rees schrieb:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:14 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From my understanding of the clustering software, it appears that
Tomcat is trying to send messages to the other Tomcat but it isn't
receiving them? Shouldn't it drop membership and give up? I suspect
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack wasn't
> read by FastAsyncSender.
> The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for FastAsyncSender
> you should set sendAck="false" on the rec
So, I looked at JMX Console and see that under RequestProcessor for Catalina
it shows all the HTTP request processor threads. And, for each, it shows an
attribute called "requestProcessingTime" which I think is the time it took
to process that request. So, I was thinking to write a script to que
It was this David. 5.0 is a little different. Thanks to all that helped
out!
maxActive
10
maxIdle
1
maxWait
1
username
user
Yup. DB will always be a bottleneck in any application, so we load balance
it for optimum performance. So, we can "forget" the DB bottleneck since we
add another DB if it starts hitting our threshold. So, the first test i did
was to find out the DB performance and its maximum values. That is c
Many thanks - so far it does not break anything (Linux/Solaris), but I do not
have a good (application/)test to confirm the reply_timout feature.
Rgds - Fred
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> fredk2 schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When is mod_jk 1.2.27 expected to be stable?
>>
>> I just stumble
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Kemper schrieb:
Hello,
I'm running Apache 1.3 with mod_jk 1.2.7-dev and three instances of Tomcat
6.0.14.
Because I experienced that after a certain time some database connections
are not closed properly and the memory use increases, we decided to restart
the Tomcat
Thompson,Roger wrote:
So there is something in log4j that munges the parameter sstring.
Unlikely. Chances are there is something in Tomcat's internal debug logging
that does this. It isn't entirely surprising. The request dumper valve has
a similar side-effect.
that some library outside of t
you can't know until you request the resource.
ie, a timeout can happen at point X, 2 min later, the application does
getOutputStream.print, and receives an IOException,
obviously the timeout happened X+20sec, not X+2min, so no, no real way
to know.
for your filter to know that "a ioexception
OK, after some flailing around, I installed a fresh version of tomcat 5.5.26
and added the test page from the FAQ. I'm testing two ways One using the
submit button to test the POST, and testing response to GET by encoding the
"query" Romans à clef as:
http://resdev1.dev.oclc.org:2/textEn
Say I have the following filter which is responsible for timing all requests
in my application:
public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response,
FilterChain filterChain) throws IOException, ServletException {
startTiming(request, response);
filterChain.doFilter(reque
Hello,
I'm running Apache 1.3 with mod_jk 1.2.7-dev and three instances of Tomcat
6.0.14.
Because I experienced that after a certain time some database connections
are not closed properly and the memory use increases, we decided to restart
the Tomcat completely. But in order to have no down
Hello!
I have a cluster with two Tomcat's. When I shutdown one and the other still
active I do not want to run valueunbound in the first. How do I do that?
Basically:
If (shutdown node 1 and node 2 is Active)
then
{
do nothing;
}
else
{
business logic;
}
Thanks a lot
The key is this line:
INFO: Reloading this Context has started
It looks like the webapp is started, and then *immediately* it's
re-loaded & started again. Reloading happens automatically if the
app's has the attribute reloadable=true and the app is
modified. It could be that the timestamp on one o
Hi. Since this forum focuses mostly on running and configuring Tomcat, you
might get more help at javaranch.com.
>>> Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/29/2008 9:48 PM >>>
Hi, (using 6.0.16)
I want to create a jsp that is able to be seen in a browser without
using tomcat (a simple HTMLish prev
Google is your friend.
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=118662577608193&w=3
karthikn wrote:
Hi
On Look up at Catalina .out
TOMCAT 5.5.23
JSDK =1.6
O/S HP UNIX PA-RISC 6 GB RAM
Question : I am frequently getting these errors
Can some body suggest me how to handle this situation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kimberly,
Kimberly Begley wrote:
| I was hoping to use the jsp:include tag to include the snippet (no html or
| body tags) - I tried with the same code that Chris sent to open a jpeg -
| thinking it might be the same solution for the html but have go
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Kimberly Begley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trying to get a c:import to work - now I get the error printed in the middle
> of the page saying that:
>
> The requested resource (/test/home/kimberly/Desktop/testhtmlfile1.html) is
> not available
>
> where test
Hi,
Appreciate if you anyone accessed AJP Queue, your code snippet would
help me a great deal.
Thanks
Sri
srinivasch wrote:
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Thanks for your prompt response. I understand from your response that
> TOMCAT
> JMX doesnt provide me a way to access the AJP Queue. Does linux
Hi
On Look up at Catalina .out
TOMCAT 5.5.23
JSDK =1.6
O/S HP UNIX PA-RISC 6 GB RAM
Question : I am frequently getting these errors
Can some body suggest me how to handle this situation
Mar 30, 2008 12:10:31 AM org.apache.tomcat.util.http.Parameters
processParameters
WARNING
Greetings Folks,
I have an Apache (Proxy Server) Tomcat/Mediasurface Application, and I
have been given the task of trying to solve how to force download a
pdf link that is embedded on a *.jsp page...
I was trying to use
ForceType application/pdf
Header set Content-Disposition attachment
See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack wasn't read
by FastAsyncSender.
The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for FastAsyncSender you should set
sendAck="false" on the receiving side.
Ronald.
On Mon Mar 31 02:07:51 CEST 2008 Tomcat Users List
wrot
I've had a problem with send/receive buffers filling up because
FastAsyncSocketSender doesn't read the Ack from the other cluster node.
Does netstat -n give you full buffers on the cluster tcp connections (port 8015
I think)?
This might cause Tomcat to stack up a lot of session data in its inter
On Fri Mar 28 16:11:21 CET 2008 Tomcat Users List
wrote:
Folks,
I am in the process of hosting a site on Tomcat on Ubuntu. I will be
also running a mail server. As per your experience which are the top
mail servers? While googling I came to know these names :
Sendmail
Postfix
I would appreci
> From: wicket0123 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [W]e want every request to be processed within 25
> millisecods.
[...]
> 2. Ad server process the request which include app. code and
> talking to DB
Your database communication, queries and data will have to be very, very
heavily optimised if you wa
Hi all,
No more help required - I traced back all the references to the Request
objects and it did turn out to be a bug in my application code. One of
my tracing classes (written a long time ago, before we used Tomcat) was
caching all created Thread objects. So when Tomcat decided to allocate
ne
47 matches
Mail list logo