> I think so too. My personal doubt is still about how Tomcat
> would try map a request that comes in as "/", ""
> being variable and being NOT "myapp". Since it does not find
> a match with "/myapp", and since obviously there cannot be an
> infinity of "/webapps/" apps pre-config
wrote in message
news:887c111b0911241208v65192e8fp20e0730fb09ff...@mail.gmail.com...
> Hi guys,
>
> I spent my day into struggling with Tomcat 6 and I just wanted to ask you
> for some ideas and whether what I'm doing seems right to you.
>
> So, I'm trying to port a legacy application which is u
2009/11/24 :
> HTTP connector. I'll attach the conf folder from tomcat.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Geoffrey
>
> Phone Norway: +47 45 86 53 83
> Fileflow Technologies AS
> Ole Deviks vei 35, 0668 Oslo, Norway
>
> -
>
>
>
> On 24 Nov 2009, at 21:03, Konstantin
Never mind, got it. I was using JAVA_OPTS instead of CATALINA_OPTS.
--Eric
Disclaimer - November 24, 2009
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for Tomcat Users List. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute, cop
Robinson, Eric wrote:
I want to run multiple instances of tomcat on the same server, one
instance for each time zone. I have all the separate tomcats running
fine, but they are all using the server's time zone. I've been Googling
and have not found an effective way to do it. Can someone please
I want to run multiple instances of tomcat on the same server, one
instance for each time zone. I have all the separate tomcats running
fine, but they are all using the server's time zone. I've been Googling
and have not found an effective way to do it. Can someone please tell me
how?
--Eric
Thanks guys, good responses, I think I'll not use the Centos packages
and go with the "official" versions for the reasons mentioned.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:34 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> fred basset wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've got a new server running the latest Centos. I want to install
>
As this is a part of the hibernate configuration rather than the
database / datasource configuration the SQL dialect has to be configured
in the hibernate configuration file, not in the context.
Here's my SessionFactory class just in case:
(I think this could be realized in a better way using
On 24/11/2009 20:03, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/11/24:
There is a different amount of data sent each time before it crashes. I also
tried byte by byte and gets the same error but it seems that it is less often.
So it is random... I wonder what can trigger it.
What connectors are you usi
On 24/11/2009 23:06, Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/11/24 Guifre Bosch Fabregas:
Hi people!
I have an unusual problem.
I recently installed apache and if I go to server browser and put:
http://localhost/APP or http://127.0.0.1/app works fine but if I put into a
remote server http://192.168.1.6/app
2009/11/24 Guifre Bosch Fabregas :
> Hi people!
>
> I have an unusual problem.
> I recently installed apache and if I go to server browser and put:
> http://localhost/APP or http://127.0.0.1/app works fine but if I put into a
> remote server http://192.168.1.6/app i don0t aee nothing!
>
> Whats ha
On 24/11/2009 19:26, geoff...@fileflow.com wrote:
I can't find anything in the list archive. You're sure it's not another list?
No, it's this one. Konstantin found it.
p
Best Regards
Geoffrey
Phone Norway: +47 45 86 53 83
Fileflow Technologies AS
Ole Deviks vei 35, 0668 Oslo, Norway
--
fred basset wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a new server running the latest Centos. I want to install
Apace tomcat on there.
Should I use tomcat5 installed via yum, or instead use the "original"
version from http://tomcat.apache.org?
Also, my server currently has OpenJDK1.6. For max. reliability and
l
On Nov 24, 2009, at 5:11 PM, fred basset wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a new server running the latest Centos. I want to install
Apace tomcat on there.
-- Presumably you mean CentOS 5.
Should I use tomcat5 installed via yum, or instead use the "original"
version from http://tomcat.apache.org?
Yo
(Let's see if I can beat Pid and Charles to this...)
Guifre Bosch Fabregas wrote:
Hi people!
I have an unusual problem.
Not really. It is a rather frequent one.
I recently installed apache and if I go to server browser and put:
http://localhost/APP or http://127.0.0.1/app works fine but if
Hi All,
I've got a new server running the latest Centos. I want to install
Apace tomcat on there.
Should I use tomcat5 installed via yum, or instead use the "original"
version from http://tomcat.apache.org?
Also, my server currently has OpenJDK1.6. For max. reliability and
least hassles is this
Hi people!
I have an unusual problem.
I recently installed apache and if I go to server browser and put:
http://localhost/APP or http://127.0.0.1/app works fine but if I put into a
remote server http://192.168.1.6/app i don0t aee nothing!
Whats happend
Hi guys,
I spent my day into struggling with Tomcat 6 and I just wanted to ask you
for some ideas and whether what I'm doing seems right to you.
So, I'm trying to port a legacy application which is using Tomcat 5.0.28 to
Tomcat 6.0.20.
While most of the Tomcat 5.0.28 properties are read from the
2009/11/24 :
> There is a different amount of data sent each time before it crashes. I also
> tried byte by byte and gets the same error but it seems that it is less often.
>
So it is random... I wonder what can trigger it.
What connectors are you using? Is it HTTP, or AJP? What is your
configu
awarnier wrote:
>
> Glynbach2 wrote:
>> The answer came from the IIS forums. In IIS 6 I also needed to add a Web
>> Service Extension for the redirect dll and set it to be 'Allowed'.
>> Haven't
>> had to do that in previous versions of IIS and afaik it's not in the how
>> to
>> either.
>
> Not
I can't find anything in the list archive. You're sure it's not another list?
Best Regards
Geoffrey
Phone Norway: +47 45 86 53 83
Fileflow Technologies AS
Ole Deviks vei 35, 0668 Oslo, Norway
-
On 24 Nov 2009, at 19:18, Pid wrote:
> On 24/11/2009 17:37
Thanks for your help. There is a new IIS permissionings section for filters,
I had to add a new web extension there and all was good.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/IIS-redirect-stops-at--xxx--is-a-servlet-url---should-redirect-to-ajp13-tp26495411p26499936.html
Sent from
> From: Samuel Penn [mailto:s...@glendale.org.uk]
> Subject: AD Authentication
> connectionURL="ldap://172.17.10.100:389";
>connectionName="cn=SvcUser,cn=users,dc=myorg,dc=local"
>connectionPassword=""
>userBase="ou=staff,dc=myorg,dc=local"
>userPatt
Samuel Penn wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get Tomcat to authenticate against Active Directory, but
failing
...
Not directly related to what your current issue is, but just as
information :
http://www.ioplex.com/jespa.html
I am using that in Windows environments, and it really works out of the
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: IIS redirect stops at [xxx] is a servlet url - should
> redirectto ajp13
>
> 2037 2040 2041 2042 2043
> these are strange (to me)
These must be opened by some webapp, not Tomcat itself.
> But you might as well remove the "redirectPo
On 24/11/2009 17:37, geoff...@fileflow.com wrote:
There is a different amount of data sent each time before it crashes. I also
tried byte by byte and gets the same error but it seems that it is less often.
Something is ringing a bell. Search the list archives & see if you can
find anything s
Same problem. I'm getting lost.
Best Regards
Geoffrey
Phone Norway: +47 45 86 53 83
Fileflow Technologies AS
Ole Deviks vei 35, 0668 Oslo, Norway
-
On 24 Nov 2009, at 18:38, g f wrote:
> Perhaps change your code from
> while((bytesRead = in.read(buf))
Hi all,
I'm trying to get Tomcat to authenticate against Active Directory, but
failing
in that all I seem to get back is the following error:
24-Nov-2009 17:10:18 org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm authenticate
SEVERE: Exception performing authentication
javax.naming.NamingException: [LDAP: err
Perhaps change your code from
while((bytesRead = in.read(buf)) > 0) {
while((bytesRead = in.read(buf)) != -1) {
>From api:
Reads the next byte of data from the input stream. The value byte is
returned as an int in the range 0 to 255. If no byte is available
because the end of the stream has been
There is a different amount of data sent each time before it crashes. I also
tried byte by byte and gets the same error but it seems that it is less often.
Best Regards
Geoffrey
Phone Norway: +47 45 86 53 83
Fileflow Technologies AS
Ole Deviks vei 35, 0668 Oslo, Norway
-
On 24/11/2009 17:27, geoff...@fileflow.com wrote:
The files are up to 30GB so it is not a solution. When I try without the buffer
it doesn't seem to work at all. What I mean is that the servlet sends some data
before the error occurs when sending with the buffer but I get 0KB without.
At what
The files are up to 30GB so it is not a solution. When I try without the buffer
it doesn't seem to work at all. What I mean is that the servlet sends some data
before the error occurs when sending with the buffer but I get 0KB without.
Best Regards
Geoffrey
Phone Norway: +47 45 86 53 83
Fil
On 24/11/2009 17:17, geoff...@fileflow.com wrote:
The bytesRead returns the size of the buffer (8KB) every time. I also debug and
I can't find anything wrong. Input and OutputStream are not null, bytesRead is
the correct size and the buffer is also filled.
Any other ideas?
How big is the fil
Glynbach2 wrote:
The answer came from the IIS forums. In IIS 6 I also needed to add a Web
Service Extension for the redirect dll and set it to be 'Allowed'. Haven't
had to do that in previous versions of IIS and afaik it's not in the how to
either.
Not entirely true. Check the bottom of this p
The bytesRead returns the size of the buffer (8KB) every time. I also debug and
I can't find anything wrong. Input and OutputStream are not null, bytesRead is
the correct size and the buffer is also filled.
Any other ideas?
Best Regards
Geoffrey
On 24 Nov 2009, at 18:13, Ronald Klop wrote:
Try insert some debug statements just before the out.write.
System.out.println("bytesRead: " + bytesRead) would be interesting.
In fact this is kind of my-first-debugging and you don't even mention you did
try it.
Ronald.
Op dinsdag, 24 november 2009 17:57 schreef geoff...@fileflow.com:
The answer came from the IIS forums. In IIS 6 I also needed to add a Web
Service Extension for the redirect dll and set it to be 'Allowed'. Haven't
had to do that in previous versions of IIS and afaik it's not in the how to
either.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/IIS-redi
Glynbach2 wrote:
Thanks for the reply, and yes indeed, I've run out of my knowledge of what
to eliminate. I'd checked the netstat already and there was a Tomcat6.exe
process running on 8009. I've now done a successful telnet as well (though
Tomcat doesn't close the connection).
Ok, this was
Hi everyone.
I'm stuck with a problem I don't understand. We have a tomcat server and after
redeploying our war file, we get this error:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.append(ByteChunk.java:346)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Intern
awarnier wrote:
>
> Just to try to eliminate the obvious :
> - is Tomcat really listening on port 8009 ?
> "netstat -an" will tell you.
> - is port 8009 not being blocked by the Windows firewall or such ?
> you can slso try "telnet localhost 8009" (if it works, Tomcat will
> accept and then
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Redirecting a port to a webapp
>
> Or, since :666 should be treated specially, you could arrange for only
> the redirector webapp to be deployed on it, as ROOT.
I think you missed much of the discussion; this part is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 11/24/2009 9:21 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: Redirecting
>> a port to a webapp
>>
>> Since it does not find a match with "/myapp", and since obviously
>> there cannot be an inf
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Redirecting a port to a webapp
>
> Since it does not find a match with "/myapp", and since
> obviously there cannot be an infinity of "/webapps/" apps
> pre-configured, would it then pass it to the "default app" (/ROOT) ?
> Because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 11/23/2009 10:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> The first hurdle is that the HttpRequest is
> immutable, so you can't just change its URL and let the call through to
> the servlet(s). You have to subclass, or wrap, the original request,
> and t
Glynbach2 wrote:
Hi, I am having problems with IIS redirect using IIS6, Tomcat 6 and JRE6. The
servlet can be accessed on :8080 but gives a 404 error on :80.
Just to try to eliminate the obvious :
- is Tomcat really listening on port 8009 ?
"netstat -an" will tell you.
- is port 8009 not being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike,
On 11/23/2009 7:17 AM, Looijmans, Mike wrote:
> ...
>> Note that you'll end up with two independent copies of the servlet
>> in your two webapp directories, and they won't share things like
>> Sessions between them.
>
> And, as I mentioned, I d
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Subject: [OT] Re: Tomcat 6 and Apache2 VS Tomcat 6 alone
>
> > Additionally, if you added a new host, you would need to edit the
> server.xml to add a reference to it. It would be much nicer if it
> worked like context config files. The file system currently
On 24/11/2009 12:34, Robert Koberg wrote:
On Nov 24, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Robert Koberg wrote:
On Nov 24, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Pid wrote:
On 24/11/2009 11:57, Robert Koberg wrote:
On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/11/24 TheGrailer:
The most compellig argument from the "
Just a quick notice of Excelsior JET 7.0 beta 3 availability:
http://www.excelsior-usa.com/jetdlbeta.html
In particular, it enables you to hide the conf/ directory if you don't want
anyone to inspect or modify your Tomcat config files.
The final release is scheduled for December.
Best regards,
Hi, I am having problems with IIS redirect using IIS6, Tomcat 6 and JRE6. The
servlet can be accessed on :8080 but gives a 404 error on :80.
I've done redirect on older machines with no problems in the past, but I
can't find the problem here, I also am stuck as to what my next debugging
step shou
Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/11/24 Looijmans, Mike
Because the "" is a random word, not a
constant, nor the name of a servlet. Think wikipedia, the request might
be for /foo or /bar or whatever, and the servlet uses that word for its
own purposes (it will look it up in the database and return
On Nov 24, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Robert Koberg wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Pid wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/2009 11:57, Robert Koberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
>>>
2009/11/24 TheGrailer:
> The most compellig argument from the "Apache2 and Tomca
On Nov 24, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 24/11/2009 11:57, Robert Koberg wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/11/24 TheGrailer:
The most compellig argument from the "Apache2 and Tomcat 6"-friend was
indeed the static content part.
>>>
>>> ht
is it possible to define SQL Dialects "org.hibernate.dialect.MySQLDialect" in
context.xml in Tomcat? how? thanks.
Jens Greven wrote:
>
> You can also use c3p0 with Tomcat JNDI, e. g.
>
>
>
>auth="Container"
> type="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataS
On 24/11/2009 11:57, Robert Koberg wrote:
On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/11/24 TheGrailer:
The most compellig argument from the "Apache2 and Tomcat 6"-friend was
indeed the static content part.
http://tomcat.markmail.org/message/il33wqqjb2dok6xz might be
illuminatin
On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
> 2009/11/24 TheGrailer :
>> The most compellig argument from the "Apache2 and Tomcat 6"-friend was
>> indeed the static content part.
>
> http://tomcat.markmail.org/message/il33wqqjb2dok6xz might be
> illuminating - along with the discussion ar
This changelog link works better.
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog-1.1.x.html
Cheers,
Ronald.
Op maandag, 23 november 2009 21:59 schreef jean-frederic clere
:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.18 stable. Thi
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:56 AM, TheGrailer wrote:
>
> And my "Tomcat alone"-friend thought I should go Varnish if I was to load
> balance with 2 Tomcats or something like that, but that's a different story.
> Not Apache2 anyway.
So one of your friends suggests httpd for static content and virtu
2009/11/24 TheGrailer :
> The most compellig argument from the "Apache2 and Tomcat 6"-friend was
> indeed the static content part.
http://tomcat.markmail.org/message/il33wqqjb2dok6xz might be
illuminating - along with the discussion around it on that thread. I
suspect Chris will be making his own
Markus Schönhaber-10 wrote:
>
> TheGrailer:
>
>> So what do you all think? Is the Apache2 infront of the Tomcat 6 a waste
>> of
>> time or worth while?
>
> I agree with what Pid and Peter already said. Just to phrase it with my
> own words: I see two major reasons why you'd want to put httpd
Peter Crowther wrote:
>
> 2009/11/24 TheGrailer
>
>> Im pretty new to this but have 2 friends that help me out. Though one of
>> my
>> friends tells me to use Apache2 infront of Tomcat and the other one tells
>> me
>> it's unnecessary.
>>
>
> Finding out their reasoning - and the evidence ea
TheGrailer:
> So what do you all think? Is the Apache2 infront of the Tomcat 6 a waste of
> time or worth while?
I agree with what Pid and Peter already said. Just to phrase it with my
own words: I see two major reasons why you'd want to put httpd in front
of Tomcat
1. To act as a load balancer f
You can also use c3p0 with Tomcat JNDI, e. g.
description="DB Connection"
jdbcUrl="jdbc:mysql://server:3306/mysql?autoReconnect=true"
driverClass="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"
user="root"
password="password"
thank you, it works!
there are two factor need to mention:
1) as i used hibernate to create Database-connection before, the connection
pool C3P0 was used in hibernate. but when i try to maintain
Database-connection through JNDI in tomcat, i donn't need C3P0 anymore. so,
i SHOULD delete configura
On 11/23/2009 10:49 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks Team for the fixes and any enhancements!
So does one need to uninstall the older version before installing this one?
The files of the new packages will overwrite the old ones, but that is
good idea to uninstall the old package(s).
Cheers
J
2009/11/24 TheGrailer
> Im pretty new to this but have 2 friends that help me out. Though one of my
> friends tells me to use Apache2 infront of Tomcat and the other one tells
> me
> it's unnecessary.
>
Finding out their reasoning - and the evidence each one has supporting their
point of view -
On 24/11/2009 09:47, TheGrailer wrote:
Hi,
Im pretty new to this but have 2 friends that help me out. Though one of my
friends tells me to use Apache2 infront of Tomcat and the other one tells me
it's unnecessary.
Single server? Tomcat alone is just fine.
I'll try to explain my situation:
Hi,
Im pretty new to this but have 2 friends that help me out. Though one of my
friends tells me to use Apache2 infront of Tomcat and the other one tells me
it's unnecessary.
I'll try to explain my situation:
I've started a virtual Ubuntu 8.04 Longterm server and my goal is to have
atleast one s
2009/11/24 Looijmans, Mike
> Because the "" is a random word, not a
> constant, nor the name of a servlet. Think wikipedia, the request might
> be for /foo or /bar or whatever, and the servlet uses that word for its
> own purposes (it will look it up in the database and return something
> inte
> Let's refresh the issue :
>
> A request comes into Tomcat for a URL "/". It comes in
> either on port 80 or port 666. And you want it to be
> processed by the webapp at "/myapp/".
No: If it comes in at port 80, nothing "different" is supposed to
happen. So / should do whatever /x
70 matches
Mail list logo
