JNDI bind in embedded Tomcat for "java:app"
Hello Tomcat users!
I'm using an embedded Tomcat (9.0.54) with Spring Boot.
I have to execute some legacy code of an Java EE application which uses local
EJBs an makes JNDI look for "java:app/foo/bar". Now I want to create an
instance as Spring Bean an register it in the JNDI context. But Tomcat only
registers objects in path "java:comp/env", if I use
context.getNamingResources().addResource() by overwriting
TomcatServletWebServerFactory.postProcessContext(ctx).
Is there a supported solution for registering objects in "java:app"?
I have a workaround with context.bind("java:app/foo/bar") during application
startup but I need to do some dirty things to make the context writable. I
think this is neither a good nor a long term solution.
Any ideas or hints for a better approach?
Thanks!
Regards,
Thomas
AW: AW: Logging web applications with log4j 1.2
Hi Chris, > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Thomas, > > On 2/21/19 07:20, Thomas Rohde wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christopher Schultz > > [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. > > Februar 2019 16:41 An: users@tomcat.apache.org Betreff: Re: Logging > > web applications with log4j 1.2 > > > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > >>> > >>> Thomas, > >>> > >>> On 2/20/19 08:00, Thomas Rohde wrote: > >>>> I've some basic questions regarding the usage of log4j 1.2 in > >>>> Tomcat 8.5. > >>>> > >>>> We are running more than one web application in Tomcat. Each > >>>> application uses log4j via slf4j and ships the log4j.jar in > >>>> > >>> WEB-INF/lib. The Tomcat itself uses JULI. > >>> > >>> We are using a common log4j.xml file for configuration. > >>> > >>> The file path is set as system property in CATALINA_OPTS as > >>> follows: -Dlog4j.configuration=/path/to/file/log4j.xml > >>> > >>> 1. Is this a valid setup or are there any side effects in > >>> initialization log4j by the different WebAppClassLoaders? > >> > >> You are not using classpath-based config-file-loading, so it should > >> not be a problem[*]. > >> > >>> 2. We are observing weird things in rolling the files hourly. > >>> The timestamp of the log messages doesn't fit to the timestamp > >>> suffix of the file. Why does this happen? > >> > >> Possibly conflicting time zones, somewhere? Because log4j.jar is in > >> each application's class loader, they CAN have different in-memory > >> configurations. > > No there are no different time zones in use. > > That's what I figured. I've never see anything quite like you describe. I > could imagine that the JVM has one time zone but the shell is using another. > > For example, if the JVM is convinced that the time zone is UTC but when you > are logged-into the server, your shell has TZ=America/Los_Angeles, then > you'll see a ~9 hour difference between file timestamps and the filenames. > Like this: > > $ ls -l logs/ > > - -rw-r--r-- 12345 Feb 19 16:01 log4j.log.2019-02-18 > - -rw-r--r-- 12345 Feb 20 16:00 log4j.log.2019-02-19 > - -rw-r--r-- 12345 Feb 21 16:01 log4j.log.2019-02-20 > > Note how each filename has the name you'd expect, but the timestamp looks a > little odd. If you look into each file, you'd see that e.g. in the 2019-02-19 > file, the timestamps go from 2019-02-19T00:00:00 through 2019-02-19T23:59:59 > but it looks like the file was rotated 8 hours earlier. That's because it was > rotated at 00:00 (PST) as reckoned by the JVM, but at 16:01 in UTC. > > My recommendation would be to set all of your timezones to the same thing. > UTC makes the most sense to me, but that's just my opinion. > Theoretically, all timestamps are interchangeable, right? Thank you for the hint. We will check that! > > >> [*] While this will work, why would you ever want multiple > >> applications to have their logging configuration all tied together? > >> Why not separate the logging configuration into one config-per web > >> application? OR are you trying to unify all logging into the same > >> file(s )? > > Yes I would like to do that, but I'm not sure how to achieve it > > without putting the log4j.xml into the WAR file. Do you have any hint? > I can think of several ways, but it depends upon how your application > initializes log4j. > > If you specify where the configuration file is, directly, then you can either > change that to somewhere else, or you can replace that filename with a > parameter that you can set in web.xml -- say, in an . You *are* > configuring log4j in a ServletContextInitializer, right? > > If you just do "new PropertyConfigurator()" (like I do), then it will search > the parent ClassLoader and that's it. In that case, you'll have to arrange > for the log4j.properties file to be present, there. Placing it in the WAR > file is an option. Another option would be to put the file elsewhere, but > then modify the Tomcat configuration to add another directory to the > ClassLoader, like this: > > > >webAppMount="/" > base="/path/to/app-specific-log-dir" > cl
AW: Logging web applications with log4j 1.2
Hi Chris, -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2019 16:41 An: users@tomcat.apache.org Betreff: Re: Logging web applications with log4j 1.2 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Thomas, > > > > On 2/20/19 08:00, Thomas Rohde wrote: > > > I've some basic questions regarding the usage of log4j 1.2 in Tomcat > > > 8.5. > > > > > > We are running more than one web application in Tomcat. Each > > > application uses log4j via slf4j and ships the log4j.jar in > > WEB-INF/lib. The Tomcat itself uses JULI. > > > > We are using a common log4j.xml file for configuration. > > > > The file path is set as system property in CATALINA_OPTS as > > follows: -Dlog4j.configuration=/path/to/file/log4j.xml > > > > 1. Is this a valid setup or are there any side effects in > > initialization log4j by the different WebAppClassLoaders? > > You are not using classpath-based config-file-loading, so it should not be a > problem[*]. > > > 2. We are observing weird things in rolling the files hourly. The > > timestamp of the log messages doesn't fit to the timestamp suffix of > > the file. Why does this happen? > > Possibly conflicting time zones, somewhere? Because log4j.jar is in each > application's class loader, they CAN have different in-memory configurations. No there are no different time zones in use. > > [*] While this will work, why would you ever want multiple applications to > have their logging configuration all tied together? > Why not separate the logging configuration into one config-per web > application? OR are you trying to unify all logging into the same file(s )? Yes I would like to do that, but I'm not sure how to achieve it without putting the log4j.xml into the WAR file. Do you have any hint? > > - -chris > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlxtdSUACgkQHPApP6U8 > pFhxow//T+5ALVYJcljqLxykHND7ZSy9NHf0+a+jnWzlDO5S6oO+bxjso9raJZYC > jUG4nhBwuAtD5MWyS04t0UedYUBP+n1iw4aAGs7PrhFgPxLiHZpMOTBBaeDSYgny > bI+7GuqOhkiauPA8Jb6guE8SkrT18d9X+k7xzy6puYgqbTws0iwk2yEmSV+KNtXy > 0EsVC20KGhU9pCdD7MLSpYX8PaM8sctazxSSVMygL9Ed03WKkJ6BRPavq4ao1uGg > V0ZlTQb7f9PRPOXOQzoAlsaWNTCVRKQES82/HHJE/uJG5tg7jnQ5Syjs53FyfVwH > 0AtfNpJiOI4LES5ejR7E5JZ8Lx0/J41XwsPO5hOmYaiHHs35EFtozCETNNwjYxcb > 245z++YsBw0bnBDRpAFi5Kq5UL8ludo0CqDTfKQSIqrMoNHoiULm4U3niGl2P01w > O8k2KrwqtYWu77esh+TpJpXTTaLnEhCc+YWFGWnER3w8WAOHitvjbmAi21gL3NIG > 3PJEFEdrNMaoI2h3SkK+DJzuVVJRmXRMV2wduX4+3qGW6l31Jo3ihFiDDdXyGB+b > jtpU1JHYfYP+ck8mEXgOvI6RXZEG7R8Ef7ectYuKdhRRpE+S9wx1llZminsxY/fr > 0apA+L6paBo9R7EGxJVt237wx/L+tRnfF5raLZoAJrkks7SkWgE= > =sjai > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Logging web applications with log4j 1.2
Hi! I've some basic questions regarding the usage of log4j 1.2 in Tomcat 8.5. We are running more than one web application in Tomcat. Each application uses log4j via slf4j and ships the log4j.jar in WEB-INF/lib. The Tomcat itself uses JULI. We are using a common log4j.xml file for configuration. The file path is set as system property in CATALINA_OPTS as follows: -Dlog4j.configuration=/path/to/file/log4j.xml 1. Is this a valid setup or are there any side effects in initialization log4j by the different WebAppClassLoaders? 2. We are observing weird things in rolling the files hourly. The timestamp of the log messages doesn't fit to the timestamp suffix of the file. Why does this happen? Regards, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: Catalina.out not updating
Hi Akhilesh, have you checked your file system permissions? Has the Tomcat runtime user the permissions to write into the log directory? Regards, Thomas BTW: Tomcat 6 ist end of life since 31 December 2016 (https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-60-eol.html). Please consider upgrading to Tomcat 9. Von: Akhilesh ET [mailto:akhilesh...@itcinfotech.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 13:31 An: users@tomcat.apache.org Betreff: Catalina.out not updating Hi All, We are facing a situation wherein one of our production servers running tomcat 6.0.18 is unable to generate logs after service startup. Logging just stops after service start up. The setup is such a way that the control flows from a Apache Webserver to Jboss application server to Tomcat server. The tomcat server will connect to the external API URLs and logs should be generated for the same which is not working from past one week. Just to give you an insight we are using source code based tomcat server and not rpm based. So the service startup is done using startup.sh script. We tried swapping the IP of the server with the one that was working with no luck (The status was reversed with the server with same IP still not working). Which means there is something to do with the IP which is causing that issue (our assumption). Please let me know what else needs to checked in order to make this working. The application itself is working fine. However the issue is with only the log generation which is very critical for tracking the application. Details of troubleshooting done so far : 1. Cleared the logs, restarted the service – No luck. 2. Cleared the cache of the server and restarted the service – No luck. 3. Rebooted the server multiple times – No Luck. 4. Tried starting tomcat from different web root and upgrading java – No Luck. 5. Gave full permissions to tomcat folder and log files – No Luck Thanks & Regards Akhilesh.E.T ITC Infotech India Ltd., ITC Infotech Park, #18 Banaswadi Main Road, Bangalore - 560005 Disclaimer: This communication is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) and shall not attach any liability on the originator or ITC Infotech India Ltd./its Holding company/ its Subsidiaries/ its Group Companies. If you are the addressee, the contents of this e-mail are intended for your use only and it shall not be forwarded to any third party, without first obtaining written authorization from the originator or ITC Infotech India Ltd./ its Holding company/its Subsidiaries/ its Group Companies. It may contain information which is confidential and legally privileged and the same shall not be used or dealt with by any third party in any manner whatsoever without the specific consent of ITC Infotech India Ltd./ its Holding company/ its Subsidiaries/ its Group Companies.
RE: AW: File and directory permissions on Tomcat 8.5 tar archive
Chris, -Original message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Friday 24th November 2017 14:46 To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: File and directory permissions on Tomcat 8.5 tar archive -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thomas, On 11/24/17 8:39 AM, Thomas Rohde wrote: > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christopher Schultz > [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Gesendet: Freitag, 24. > November 2017 14:21 An: users@tomcat.apache.org Betreff: Re: File > and directory permissions on Tomcat 8.5 tar archive > > Rune, > > On 11/24/17 7:53 AM, Rune Rustand wrote: >> Apache Tomcat 8.5.23 Redhat Enterprise Linux 7.4 >> (3.10.0-693.1.1.el7.x86_64) > > > >> Binary distributions tar archive > >> We are upgrading our servers from Tomcat 8.0 to Tomcat 8.5, and >> are using the core archive. The process is done by running a >> puppet script that extracts the tar archive on all the servers >> (many). > >> Are there any reasons why the file and directory permissions >> differ from the tar archive and the zip archive? > > Good question. Evidently, both Info-Zip (the 'unzip' program > usually found on *NIX-based systems) and Apache Ant understand the > Info-Zip-specified extension to the ZIP format that encodes file > permissions and both ought to respect them when both packing and > unpacking the archive[1]. > > I don't know enough about the ZIP file format to be able to inspect > the archive to determine what's actually stored in there (to > determine if the archive lacks the permissions or if the extraction > process is at fault). > >> When I unpack the tar archive the permissions on files and >> directories are not set for all users. > >> I unpack the archive like this: tar zxvpf >> apache-tomcat-8.5.23.tar.gz > >> [snip] > >> For the zip file: unzip apache-tomcat-8.5.23.zip > >> [snip] > > Hmm. Those definitely *should be* producing the same file > permissions... at least, I'd expect them to produce the same file > permissions. > > I don't see any (missing) options to Apache ant's task that > look like they would strip those file permissions. I also don't see > any options for (Info-Zip) unzip that would be required to restore > such permissions. > > IMHO, this should Just Work. > > -chris > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_(file_format)#Implementation > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > While turning around the same issue this week I compared a > apache-tomcat-8.5.14.tar.gz and an apache-tomcat-8.0.17.tar.gz. > > The permissions differ. > > With 8.0.17 files have rw-r--r-- and with 8.5.14 files have > rw-r- > > With 8.0.17 directories (e.g. webapps) have rwxr-xr-x and with > 8.5.14 they have rwxr-x--- > > This means others have no permissions in current Tomcat versions by > default. > > I found that in the changelog of 8.5.0: Tighten up the default file > permissions for the .tar.gz distribution so no files or directories > are world readable by default. Configure Tomcat to run with a > default umask of 0027 which may be overridden by setting UMASK in > setenv.sh. (markt) > > So I think it works like expected. This is a comparison of file permissions coming from tar archives versus *zip* archives, not a comparison of file permissions coming from (only) tar archives from two different Tomcat versions. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAloYIo4ACgkQHPApP6U8 pFgo3hAAyjUnW8j885CPWUwffUCN++QWoRTP4qU/nV4X4P0SDrV6OZ7AN0g/ELGU klUqT6XRSaosHdxleVo4GKrP8vDg21XlezCsAZ6KclRvrtrGZ8yK0Toh+6Z4eyMc BReM/mqaiIeVhsq3BL8+gwpaYNsAxI68QGdLvYRe+wZ+AdZUXtPPQjrECC4fjFly kabmYuU37anAHOvMtGTPQWeqzLO0zPeA9GlIixKSknlzLedJ4ZkfBSOc8mBcaEcV aR08cHQyJyh/411p8o7gaWmZPR7cvUqN1/qgTd7E1ehJPhPiIi4Dz5CUD7Kw9Fa2 hzxxh9IBuJxc4ftGchltbKLZpoT9648Bt1zD3tzyAgZq0CMX3sibl7CM3v/NxxCc HYIImq9WrJlUNYactium9auDqfFNAJSW9WzTjCBWtwipcOMuW0kaCcQdJheQ6M3E /qUQ/M+A0aUgBxhZbuLy8R4Fx/wjReaSWg4pxMp9ZMwj+9XV32RlStz87vtuuww7 bosj9u4+weYpnfSnaUFrTSATFpJSus7bxzFw/nTY4+CsHiUwDt0pEAGVW/QNkCzX kgEKWEmMpzfSjQkj4/rvXTLu2aaLQrlVLcHHeADHkDt+rtUUp9h/EykNo2YaD3ca /gucCVnTU/6+doyiXLRyAjawVc9rYMeZ+N1RK1wbxgI/yGvtqqk= =XB2B -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat
AW: File and directory permissions on Tomcat 8.5 tar archive
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Gesendet: Freitag, 24. November 2017 14:21 An: users@tomcat.apache.org Betreff: Re: File and directory permissions on Tomcat 8.5 tar archive -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rune, On 11/24/17 7:53 AM, Rune Rustand wrote: > Apache Tomcat 8.5.23 Redhat Enterprise Linux 7.4 > (3.10.0-693.1.1.el7.x86_64) > > > > Binary distributions tar archive > > We are upgrading our servers from Tomcat 8.0 to Tomcat 8.5, and are > using the core archive. The process is done by running a puppet script > that extracts the tar archive on all the servers (many). > > Are there any reasons why the file and directory permissions differ > from the tar archive and the zip archive? Good question. Evidently, both Info-Zip (the 'unzip' program usually found on *NIX-based systems) and Apache Ant understand the Info-Zip-specified extension to the ZIP format that encodes file permissions and both ought to respect them when both packing and unpacking the archive[1]. I don't know enough about the ZIP file format to be able to inspect the archive to determine what's actually stored in there (to determine if the archive lacks the permissions or if the extraction process is at fault). > When I unpack the tar archive the permissions on files and directories > are not set for all users. > > I unpack the archive like this: tar zxvpf apache-tomcat-8.5.23.tar.gz > > [snip] > > For the zip file: unzip apache-tomcat-8.5.23.zip > > [snip] Hmm. Those definitely *should be* producing the same file permissions... at least, I'd expect them to produce the same file permissions. I don't see any (missing) options to Apache ant's task that look like they would strip those file permissions. I also don't see any options for (Info-Zip) unzip that would be required to restore such permissions. IMHO, this should Just Work. - -chris [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_(file_format)#Implementation -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAloYHLMACgkQHPApP6U8 pFhIohAAmCj7pZufx9VexFHy7vl16HOdnQZ07swJ5kT4zuK29Ajv+l734Lykx0xT YGpOmjc+lYW9B8Ewz/VaqzGuH485lWK8hMNtYzv/e4nytFvI6C4D2umm/GQwefy+ 3YihUZPg0VPtw7mROYAHMYDtuPwUFbCi9Qs9rmAil+79+DIYE+RcKOuX6Da7Qbm1 xB85hHX0x2WaPbOOZh6FUcYzekMW1Nw07ggxIP7GknnnR+cWQlRo+MMufIFChCXN f0iMGN5JEkkBuFH6j0s1IYgzxUH75pa3mqIA1T5nAv0B2VRELDCBs23MOah83w6K eghMXT3eD3ti88HD7YcrC8dUzQczpNAbxsRNx5a0G2GNUVdb1u3oa/J8qUzFQrFT 5Aay5XlJgH7MYJOJxDezUojax2e372zniVaKMjhq9qKBeLoBYdCqHO/bfpkzYK9i JARpc9PVczyQYXWpcjHvlvT3OF9MSlzVZbrqdIqNHYU5lH9rhSIp9O+bRkXQpluU uEp2EeLk6rXtUdamKooW63RD1CDNjUjpXT/Hb2WrSYDrWu8gN7/1YpuNKo1nlILS aet4dePuM/6Bd1Vs1oIi21YdKvwS2lQnr/XbKjqCwe/4qAJelHRDArHFp40cLlMv B23azWYuu6kqr8aUMSXjplNTk5/i9mkYcVCUzJkN01ZZCTvPqwo= =Rk3D -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org While turning around the same issue this week I compared a apache-tomcat-8.5.14.tar.gz and an apache-tomcat-8.0.17.tar.gz. The permissions differ. With 8.0.17 files have rw-r--r-- and with 8.5.14 files have rw-r- With 8.0.17 directories (e.g. webapps) have rwxr-xr-x and with 8.5.14 they have rwxr-x--- This means others have no permissions in current Tomcat versions by default. I found that in the changelog of 8.5.0: Tighten up the default file permissions for the .tar.gz distribution so no files or directories are world readable by default. Configure Tomcat to run with a default umask of 0027 which may be overridden by setting UMASK in setenv.sh. (markt) So I think it works like expected. Regards Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: Brand new to Tomcat
Hi Larry, of course you can add several Connector elements in server.xml. But notice that the value of the port attribute (not proxyPort) must be unique. Otherwise the second connector cannot be established at Tomcat startup. Regards Thomas -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Cohen, Laurence [mailto:lco...@novetta.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juni 2015 17:33 An: users@tomcat.apache.org Betreff: Brand new to Tomcat Hi, I find myself in a position where I am the only system administrator on a project that uses tomcat appserver and apache webeserver with a postgres backend. We have two applications, and before and changeover from mod_ssl to mod_nss we were able to go over port 80 to grab files out of the database. The web app in question is listening on port 8007, but proxied on 443. After we switch to mod_nss, something happened with the configuration or the Rewrite Rules, where we can not longer use port 80, although port 443 is working fine. In server.xml I can see the following connector line: My first question is, can I add another connector line, proxying to port 80 as so: Thanks, Larry Cohen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: Tomcat minor upgrade
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rajesh Cherukuri [mailto:rajec...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. März 2015 12:43 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Re: Tomcat minor upgrade Thanks Thomas so it is just that we need to update the newer version of file's that shows in the link you provided correct ? or do we need any more changes to libraries On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Thomas Rohde wrote: > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Rajesh Cherukuri [mailto:rajec...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. März 2015 12:01 > An: Tomcat Users List > Betreff: Tomcat minor upgrade > > hi > > can some one help me how to do the tomcat minor upgrade from 7.0.39 to > 7.0.59 > > > Hi Rajesh, > > check Tomcat migration guide: > http://tomcat.apache.org/migration-7.html#Upgrading_7.0.x > > Regards > Thomas > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > No you have to update the complete tomcat. On the website you can see changes in configuration files between minor versions of tomcat. Please ensure that any changes in the configuration files such as new attributes and changes to defaults are applied as part of the upgrade. Regards, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: Tomcat minor upgrade
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rajesh Cherukuri [mailto:rajec...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. März 2015 12:01 An: Tomcat Users List Betreff: Tomcat minor upgrade hi can some one help me how to do the tomcat minor upgrade from 7.0.39 to 7.0.59 Hi Rajesh, check Tomcat migration guide: http://tomcat.apache.org/migration-7.html#Upgrading_7.0.x Regards Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: very basic question about apache and tomcat
Am 19.09.2012 23:31, schrieb Mead, Jen L: Hi Everybody, Now I will show my real ignorance about what I know after NOT working with Apache or Tomcat for several years now. I have been working on a project that allows our CGI web pages to authenticate users from their windows desktop against Windows AD and not requiring any kind of unix account. I am slowly getting the information I need to move forward but information is just not out there to get. I am just chipping away at it. My basic question is: do I need to install apache as well as tomcat to have an httpd.conf file? I have tomcat running on several AIX servers, 6.1 and 5.3, with tomcat 7.0.27 installed. I was doing a simple search to find the httpd.conf file when I realized none of my servers have it installed. When I try to find out which app creates it I get the answer apache (from google searches). So I guess that tomcat is a subset of apache? A virtual java app I suppose? See I told you the questions were basic. Yikes it is hard to understand as a newbie, especially when I can load tomcat and get web pages working in a few minutes. LOL Any help is appreciated in regard to helping me wrap my brain around this. ARGH Regards, Jen Jen L Mead | Sys Admin | ICC Operations | Con-way | Office 503-450-8641 SAFETY| LEADERSHIP | INTEGRITY | COMMITMENT | EXCELLENCE | Driven by Integrity Hi Jen, basic answer: Apache HTTPD and Apache Tomcat have generally nothing in common. They are totally different. The httpd.conf is the main configuration file for the Apache HTTPD Webserver. It comes with the installation of an Apache HTTPD Webserver and is located in /conf/httpd.conf. Tomcat neither generates nor reads this file. Bye Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: Manager activeSessions and customized error page
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Mark Thomas Gesendet: Mo 14.05.2012 18:25 Betreff:Re: AW: Manager activeSessions and customized error page An: Tomcat Users List ; > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 14/05/2012 16:58, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > Thomas, > > > > On 5/14/12 9:44 AM, Thomas Rohde wrote: > >> A Filter was my first approach. But the filter is invoked after > >> authentication has taken place. And for authentication a session > >> is needed. ;-) > > > > Right: the form authenticator is in a Valve and Valves run before > > Filters. > > > >> A HttpSessionListener is invoked AFTER a session is created. > > > > Hrm. > > > >> It seems that every approach has some ugly pitfalls. :( > > > > Agreed. Perhaps a different exception type could be used? We are > > using IllegalStateException but there's no particular reason a > > different subclass of RuntimeException couldn't be used in this > > case: something that could then be mapped in web.xml using > > . > > > > Since it would technically be a change to the API to throw > > something other than IllegalStateException, you might get some > > push-back on a solution like this. There it is: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53230 > > A change to a new sub-class of IllegalStateException shouldn't break > anything. > > Mark > > > > > Please file a bug in bugzilla and we'll hash it out over there. > > > > -chris > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPsTIDAAoJEBDAHFovYFnnjYEP/ibbVSvXy1T22zHo/ZPeDuOJ > p/AwNGgyafsv/FExSDFVTWiRJNPRpImaVmVnc9JzRj7DQJC1xjQzp0SsCYh9Gu58 > ZGyz6U9psDZYbSW6cfNToVdbgJZWEdBXo5jb0s/kU1GHqfKx1ZzwrcKCHc2OAYZ+ > XZvMNb29ouCPF7kVdFYyXZm/WVLrw5ZQ1KL60f65iIvZDaBrBCNgnhh7Fhxq2PU+ > NzRwWiGWVAPWxk1VcBxZuJQz+qsRqp22FBkaEM8A7mDBTfbJvK+rszBqPNk/YGGq > MHRg5DysjTEWizfmRySSw9cSHtQfHq2cQxuxVMfgfMVt67BqeW+r7GB5kUNK/Dpt > fKTFw5AkmJDXYSE0tKOgVq1eECiybSP5co/DFrtnNmVQI/AXePrJ+G8lLdC9KYV/ > UyjuT8jPl5JUTA6mKUafGCxL1RYDPFZ3KYpeu9mRDW4gMMmVIsp5xUPMZvPRyfBq > l6O3zjYGMNtFaedcOColeJuXQTvYqiizB2fPzzJdh10Mmb8G1PMlB0cHjhO3/j/F > kQ1W4aQxr4gipQWj0zTqrwZYTkndia0v4VqctbiYJmyHTKAeb6z/Ks9z9yya3vF9 > TnvgG+Sf0KEP7zB01MI07UDXP/IdKIyeEhhqIJJ/U4ixSHtBui9MkjfMzjE3V6lw > SCucYHY0sZUFwRMg+Mp1 > =b/Sy > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: Manager activeSessions and customized error page
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Konstantin Kolinko Gesendet: Mo 14.05.2012 15:00 Betreff:Re: Manager activeSessions and customized error page An: Tomcat Users List ; > 2012/5/14 Thomas Rohde : > > Hi! > > > > I configured the Manager's maxActiveSessions attribute in context.xml. If > > the > configured value is exceeded an IllegalStateException "createSession: Too > many > active sessions" is thrown in ManagerBase class. In our application we catch > this exception around httpServletRequest.getSession(true) and redirect to an > customized error page. Works! > > > > Now I activated form based authentication via securiy constraint in > > web.xml. > If I try to open the web application with my browser by sending the first > request, the response is empty (status 200 OK). > > > > Is there any way to map a static customized error page in this scenario? > > > > It depends on where ErrorReportValve is in the request processing > chain in your situation. There were several changes to that (read: > fixes) in different Tomcat 7.0.x versions. You did not wrote which > version you do use. Sorry! I tested with 7.0.8. > > If it is reproducible in latest 7.0.27, feel free to create a bug > report and attach a simple sample web application + steps to > reproduce. > > It might be that it is already reproducible with the standard example > app [1], but I have not tried. > > [1] http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/security/protected/index.jsp Now I tried with the standard example and 7.0.27. I get the default 500 error page. Would be great to have a possibiltiy to make a distinguish between this error and any other error. > > > If not: Is there any other approach to limit the number of sessions? > > I think it is possible with a Filter, Valve or with a SessionListener. > It should be also be possible with a custom o.a.c.Manager. > YMMV. A Filter was my first approach. But the filter is invoked after authentication has taken place. And for authentication a session is needed. ;-) A HttpSessionListener is invoked AFTER a session is created. It seems that every approach has some ugly pitfalls. :( > > Best regards, > Konstantin Kolinko > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Manager activeSessions and customized error page
Hi! I configured the Manager's maxActiveSessions attribute in context.xml. If the configured value is exceeded an IllegalStateException "createSession: Too many active sessions" is thrown in ManagerBase class. In our application we catch this exception around httpServletRequest.getSession(true) and redirect to an customized error page. Works! Now I activated form based authentication via securiy constraint in web.xml. If I try to open the web application with my browser by sending the first request, the response is empty (status 200 OK). Is there any way to map a static customized error page in this scenario? If not: Is there any other approach to limit the number of sessions? Thanks! Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: Maximum number of sessions
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Mark Thomas Gesendet: Do 10.05.2012 15:55 Betreff:Re: Maximum number of sessions An: Tomcat Users List ; > On 10/05/2012 14:45, Thomas Rohde wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is it possible to configure an upper limit for the number of sessions > > in Tomcat? Thought the Context would be the right place for such a > > configuration parameter, but I couldn't find anything like this. > > It is on the Manager, not the Context. You want maxActiveSessions > > Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > Hi Mark! Thats what I was looking for, thank you! I should read the documentation more carefully. :-) Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Maximum number of sessions
Hi! Is it possible to configure an upper limit for the number of sessions in Tomcat? Thought the Context would be the right place for such a configuration parameter, but I couldn't find anything like this. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
AW: SEVERE: Unable to start cluster.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Dhaval Jaiswal Gesendet: Mi 04.04.2012 16:41 Betreff:SEVERE: Unable to start cluster. An: Tomcat Users List ; CC: Shrinivas Devarkonda ; > Hi List, > > Below is the error we are facing while starting tomcats. > > SEVERE: Unable to start cluster. > org.apache.catalina.tribes.ChannelException: java.net.SocketException: Not > a multicast address; No faulty members identified. > > > Our cluster setting is as below in server.xml > > > channelSendOptions="6"> > expireSessionsOnShutdown="false" >notifyListenersOnReplication="true" mapSendOptions="6"/> > > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.GroupChannel"> > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.membership.McastService" > address="192.168.3.14" > port="45564" > frequency="500" > dropTime="3"/> > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.nio.NioReceiver" > address="auto" > port="4000" > selectorTimeout="5000" > timeout="6" > maxThreads="6"/> > > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.ReplicationTransmitter"> >className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.nio.PooledParallelSender" > timeout="6" keepAliveCount="0"/> > > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.interceptors.TcpFailureDetector"/> > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.interceptors.MessageDispatch15Interc > eptor"/> > className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.interceptors.ThroughputInterceptor"/ > > > > > filter=".*\.gif|.*\.js|.*\.jpeg|.*\.jpg|.*\.png|.*\.htm|.*\.html|.*\.css|.*\.txt > "/> > className="org.apache.catalina.ha.session.JvmRouteBinderValve"/> > className="org.apache.catalina.ha.session.ClusterSessionListener"/> > className="org.apache.catalina.ha.session.JvmRouteSessionIDBinderListener"/> > > > > > Note: 192.168.3.14 is the IP of backup manager with java & 192.168.3.9 is > the IP address of local tomcat where above server.xml is hosted. > > Please guide us as to how to overcome the issue & please give us the sample > file if possible. > Hi Dhaval, you have to set a multicast ip address for the "address" attribute of the McastService. A multicast address looks like 224.x.x.x. Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast_address for further details. The Tomcat cluster uses multicast for the management of the cluster member. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Info on PermSize and MaxPermSize
Hi Geet, these parameters are not Tomcat specific. This are JVM parameters as Chuck mentioned. The parameter -XX:PermSize defines the initial size of the PermGen (permanent generation) of the jvm memory. -XX:MaxPermSize is to set the max size. Thomas Am 20.02.2012 04:46, schrieb Geet Chandra: Hi All, Please let me know, What is the difference beween PermSize and MaxPermSize in Tomcat - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Apache Tomcat Native library
Am 30.01.2012 16:26, schrieb Paul Singleton: My standalone Tomcat 6 informs me, at startup, that The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path:... Does this library offer any benefit to standalone systems, or is it purely for use with Apache httpd + Tomcat? Paul Singleton - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org Hi Paul, APR is a native HTTP implementation (heart of the Apache HTTP Server). It provides a better performance for handling the http overhead in Tomcat's request processing. See http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/apr.html for more details. If you use Apache Webserver with Tomcat you wouldn't use APR but AJP. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 6 - How to make an application available at www.mydomain.com
> Thomas Rohde wrote: >> >> That is a good point. I will change my configuration to >> >>JkMount /myApplication/* tomcat >> > Actually, you need 2 lines to cover all : > > >JkMount /myApplication tomcat # for the index ? > >JkMount /myApplication/* tomcat# for the rest Yes, I've already figured that out. > > Or you can use the following syntax : > > >SetHandler jakarta-servlet >... > That was actually new for me. I'll try it next time. Thank you! > > I personally like this second form better : it fits better with the > general Apache httpd > configuration style, and it allows for other httpd-level things in the > same section. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 6 - How to make an application available at www.mydomain.com
> André Warnier wrote: >> Thomas Rohde wrote: >>>> I'm running tomcat 6 behind apache. >>>> >>>> I currently have an application deployed as "myApplication" and it is >>>> available at "http://www.mydomain.com/myApplication";. >>>> >>>> How can I make this application available at "http://www.mydomain.com"; >>>> without deploying it as ROOT.war? >>>> >>>> My server is running Ubuntu 10.04. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Dean Del Ponte >>>> >>> >>> You could use a rewrite rule to achieve that: >>> >>> RewriteEngine On >>> RewriteRule ^/$ /myApplication/ [PT] >>> JkMount /myApplication* tomcat >>> >>> Works for me very well. >>> >> >> That is assuming that the OP has an Apache httpd front-end, which he >> never said. > > Ooops, he did... > >> Also, even if he has, the above is not enough except in the simplest of >> cases. >> As far as I can tell also, this RewriteRule only rewrites requests to >> "/". >> If that is enough to make it work for you, then one could wonder why you >> need an httpd front-end in the first place. This is a virtual host specific configuration and so it doesn't affect the whole apache web server. >> Note also that the JkMount above will not only proxy "/myApplication" >> and "/myApplication/*", but just as well "/myApplication_as_a_prefix" >> and anything else starting with "myApplication". This may or may not be >> what you want, in terms of security for example. >> >> Chuck's recommendation is still the best. >> The above notes already illustrate some of the reasons. >> Let's see if the OP really has a good reason /not to/ deploy his >> application as ROOT. >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 6 - How to make an application available at www.mydomain.com
> André Warnier wrote: >> Thomas Rohde wrote: >>>> I'm running tomcat 6 behind apache. >>>> >>>> I currently have an application deployed as "myApplication" and it is >>>> available at "http://www.mydomain.com/myApplication";. >>>> >>>> How can I make this application available at "http://www.mydomain.com"; >>>> without deploying it as ROOT.war? >>>> >>>> My server is running Ubuntu 10.04. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Dean Del Ponte >>>> >>> >>> You could use a rewrite rule to achieve that: >>> >>> RewriteEngine On >>> RewriteRule ^/$ /myApplication/ [PT] >>> JkMount /myApplication* tomcat >>> >>> Works for me very well. >>> >> >> That is assuming that the OP has an Apache httpd front-end, which he >> never said. > > Ooops, he did... Yes. ;-) > >> Also, even if he has, the above is not enough except in the simplest of >> cases. >> As far as I can tell also, this RewriteRule only rewrites requests to >> "/". >> If that is enough to make it work for you, then one could wonder why you >> need an httpd front-end in the first place. >> Note also that the JkMount above will not only proxy "/myApplication" >> and "/myApplication/*", but just as well "/myApplication_as_a_prefix" >> and anything else starting with "myApplication". This may or may not be >> what you want, in terms of security for example. That is a good point. I will change my configuration to JkMount /myApplication/* tomcat Thank you! >> >> Chuck's recommendation is still the best. >> The above notes already illustrate some of the reasons. >> Let's see if the OP really has a good reason /not to/ deploy his >> application as ROOT. >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat 6 - How to make an application available at www.mydomain.com
> I'm running tomcat 6 behind apache. > > I currently have an application deployed as "myApplication" and it is > available at "http://www.mydomain.com/myApplication";. > > How can I make this application available at "http://www.mydomain.com"; > without deploying it as ROOT.war? > > My server is running Ubuntu 10.04. > > Thanks! > > Dean Del Ponte > You could use a rewrite rule to achieve that: RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/$ /myApplication/ [PT] JkMount /myApplication* tomcat Works for me very well. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Please somebody can translate this configuration in tomcat form for server.xml or another xml config file?
Am 27.01.2012 15:28, schrieb Luciano Andress Martini: Sorry where is the correct place to put this security constraint? The web.xml file is an essential part of each Tomat web application. It is located in /WEB-INF/web.xml. 2012/1/27, Luciano Andress Martini<777u...@gmail.com>: Thomas Rohde: With this tomcat still can upload files? Cause it need to can =[ 2012/1/27, Luciano Andress Martini<777u...@gmail.com>: Thomas Rohde Man thank you very much, i will try it now! =] 2012/1/27, Luciano Andress Martini<777u...@gmail.com>: Humm sorry friends im not trying to fight, i just really need to do that. I will try to draw what i want to happen, maybe my english is very poor. (TOMCAT SERVER) says -Yes i can access /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps/temporarios/upload_contracheque i can upload files here. (USER) says -No i cant access /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps/temporarios/upload_contracheque/ (TOMCAT LIST HELPER) says Luciano, Idiot you need to move this directory outside tomcat6 upload_contracheque. (DEVELOPER) says Luciano Idiot, i never will move this directory, you just need to block it, as you do in Apache2. You dont know how to do that? Understand now? 2012/1/27, Luciano Andress Martini<777u...@gmail.com>: I really want to block a directory like /webapps/temporarios/upload_contracheque Yes is the first option but withou moving the directory outside tomcat, because im not the developer of the system, and i just put this system on the server and i really need to simple block this directory...=// I need to block this, in the similar way that i do in apache... /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps/temporarios/upload_contracheque I really cant move this outside this directory. Thank you. 2012/1/27, André Warnier: Luciano Andress Martini wrote: I need to do this in tomcat6: Apache2 form: Order allow,deny deny from all I think that you are again not very clear, but I will try to guess. There is no direct equivalent of the above in Tomcat, because Tomcat works on the base of "context" rather than "disk directory". (For an Apache2 equivalent, think instead of). So to re-phrase your question : You have a directory in Tomcat, like (tomcat_dir)/webapps/mywebapp/X , and you want to prevent (all) web users from accessing the content of that sub-directory X. Yes ? If yes, then the best way of achieving this is probably to have this directory be outside of the Tomcat /webapps/ space (better even, totally outside the Tomcat directory tree). If you need to access it from Apache2, then you can always use an Alias in Apache2. E.g. /var/www/site1/docs/ = Apache2 DocumentRoot /var/www/tomcat/webapps/ = Tomcat webapps dir /var/www/temporarios/upload = directory where the files are uploaded In Apache2 : Alias /temporarios/ /var/www/temporarios/ . (Allow/deny and other things) ... In Tomcat : nothing (Tomcat will not even see this directory, and no Tomcat URL can reach it). If your Tomcat webapp needs to read/write there, then you decide that inside your Tomcat webapp.(And you give the Apache and the Tomcat user the appropriate user-id & permissions to read/write there). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Please somebody can translate this configuration in tomcat form for server.xml or another xml config file?
Am 27.01.2012 15:07, schrieb Luciano Andress Martini: I really want to block a directory like /webapps/temporarios/upload_contracheque Yes is the first option but withou moving the directory outside tomcat, because im not the developer of the system, and i just put this system on the server and i really need to simple block this directory...=// I need to block this, in the similar way that i do in apache... /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps/temporarios/upload_contracheque Okay, it seems that your directory doesn't point to a web application but rather to a sub directory of a web application. If so you can put the rules into the web.xml file of the application. Use a security constraint to handle this: Upload directory /upload_contracheque/* uploaduser BASIC upload uploaduser Now only authenticated users with the role "uploaduser" can access the directory. Thomas I really cant move this outside this directory. Thank you. 2012/1/27, André Warnier: Luciano Andress Martini wrote: I need to do this in tomcat6: Apache2 form: Order allow,deny deny from all I think that you are again not very clear, but I will try to guess. There is no direct equivalent of the above in Tomcat, because Tomcat works on the base of "context" rather than "disk directory". (For an Apache2 equivalent, think instead of). So to re-phrase your question : You have a directory in Tomcat, like (tomcat_dir)/webapps/mywebapp/X , and you want to prevent (all) web users from accessing the content of that sub-directory X. Yes ? If yes, then the best way of achieving this is probably to have this directory be outside of the Tomcat /webapps/ space (better even, totally outside the Tomcat directory tree). If you need to access it from Apache2, then you can always use an Alias in Apache2. E.g. /var/www/site1/docs/ = Apache2 DocumentRoot /var/www/tomcat/webapps/ = Tomcat webapps dir /var/www/temporarios/upload = directory where the files are uploaded In Apache2 : Alias /temporarios/ /var/www/temporarios/ . (Allow/deny and other things) ... In Tomcat : nothing (Tomcat will not even see this directory, and no Tomcat URL can reach it). If your Tomcat webapp needs to read/write there, then you decide that inside your Tomcat webapp.(And you give the Apache and the Tomcat user the appropriate user-id & permissions to read/write there). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Please somebody can translate this configuration in tomcat form for server.xml or another xml config file?
Am 27.01.2012 13:23, schrieb Luciano Andress Martini: I need to do this in tomcat6: Apache2 form: Order allow,deny deny from all Thank you friends! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org You need to define a Remote Adress Filter for your Context, Host or Engine. See http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/valve.html#Remote_Address_Filter for more details. I think should work for you. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
