On 1/28/2013 7:13 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
bxqdev,
On 1/26/13 1:09 AM, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/26/2013 1:05 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Dude,
On 1/25/13 12:38 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i want to have one instance of webapp,
No problem
On 1/28/2013 7:11 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
bxqdev,
On 1/26/13 3:04 PM, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/26/2013 9:36 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of chris derham Subject: Re: Different
On 1/26/2013 9:23 PM, chris derham wrote:
it's not. maybe it will make things clear if i change the names of the
paths, say:
* when user goes to http://app1.com/ - {thesamewebapp}/app1 path is served
as root path of the domain app1.com
* when user goes to http://app2.com/ -
On 1/26/2013 9:36 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: cjder...@gmail.com [mailto:cjder...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of chris derham
Subject: Re: Different webapp paths on different hosts
To my mind if you deploy the app as ROOT.war, as long as DNS is
configured correctly, that single context
On 1/25/2013 12:11 PM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
See inline
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Casper W. Schmidt
Den 25-01-2013 06:38, bxqdev skrev:
On 1/24/2013 11:52 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
See inline
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Casper W. Schmidt
Den 24-01-2013 02:32
On 1/25/2013 12:29 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/1/25 bxqdev bxq...@themailbay.com:
Anyway I would say a context.xml file in conf/catalina/path1 (the
hostname)/path1.xml (the context name) should do the trick?
Place the webapp outside the appbase of the hosts and then point the
docbase
On 1/26/2013 1:05 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dude,
On 1/25/13 12:38 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i want to have one instance of webapp,
No problem.
which has two paths,
Problem: one context = one path = one instance
If you want two separate
On 1/24/2013 5:32 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BBQ,
On 1/23/13 12:09 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i need to map a custom paths, like /path1 and /path2, (not root
/ path), of the same webapp to a custom domains.
as i said i need this mapping
On 1/24/2013 11:52 AM, Casper Wandahl Schmidt wrote:
See inline
Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards
Casper W. Schmidt
Den 24-01-2013 02:32, Christopher Schultz skrev:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BBQ,
On 1/23/13 12:09 AM, bxqdev wrote:
i need to map a custom paths, like
://path1.com/path1
${samewebapp}/path2 is mapped to http://path2.com/path2
custom paths of the same webapp should map to different root paths on different
domains.
thanks!
On 1/23/2013 8:58 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: bxqdev [mailto:bxq...@themailbay.com]
Subject: Different webapp
On 1/28/2012 6:33 AM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
How much is a lot?
10'000/sec
How many Tomcats are you running?
1
How much RAM/CPU per server etc?
8GB/Xeon
How big is the average response?
300Kb
How many NICs do you have? Have fast are they?
one. as i said above, the
On 1/28/2012 12:09 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 27 Jan 2012, at 23:53, bxqdevbxq...@themailbay.com wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012
, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:16, bxqdev wrote:
2. async servlet api is not much usefull for servers, with nio
connectors (tomcat-7). at least you can't image the case.
I don't say that. In fact, I said exactly the opposite.
well, then what's the case to use both of this technologies? can
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
snip
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combinations of
connector+servlet api
1. bio connector + async servlet
2. nio
On 1/28/2012 6:14 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 28 Jan 2012, at 13:34, bxqdevbxq...@themailbay.com wrote:
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
snip
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3
andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
try to be positive, try to look on the situation from
another point of view, the one which is not depressive.
i hope my question answer summary upgraded your level of tomcat understanding.
and that's a good thing, because you
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol
connectors?
2. Do i get any advantages if i use Sync Servlet Api with Http11NioProtocol connector or do i have to use Async Servlet Api to
get the
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
There is no such protocol as apache.coyote.http11
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
Eh? Is that what you really mean?
i mean what are the reasons
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol
On 1/28/2012 1:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:31, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
both connector and servlet code are async.
is there a case when i would need
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11
On 1/28/2012 2:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:41, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27
27 matches
Mail list logo
