r aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
> From: dfis...@jmlafferty.com
> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:34:18 -0800
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>
> I recently heard the story about how PL/1 got its name. I heard this recently
Original Message-
>> From: David Fisher [mailto:dfis...@jmlafferty.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 5:41 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>>
>>>> PL/1 was a nice break from extending FORTRAN IV with BAL (A
You could, however, work around it
physically, but still have it appear logically this way.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:30 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
&g
lement et n'aura pas n'importe
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 201
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:41 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> M
st
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>
>
> i would be interested in what administration overhead with this
> translate_entry table
>
> if your goal is a lexicographical approach you could pull the data
> dictionary build routines from a search engine such as lucene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
On 9/30/2010 10:50 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> i would be interested in what administration overhead with this
> translate_entry table
Probably about the same as doing a CREATE VIEW.
> if your goal is a lexicographical approach you could pul
contenu fourni.
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:32:47 -0500
> From: jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:18 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>
>
> this is way O/T so lets take this offline
> what is meant by &quo
> -Original Message-
> From: Allen Razdow [mailto:araz...@truenum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 5:31 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>
> OK, the "I'm gray-haired and remember when memory was co
erdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Subject: RE: [OT
> -Original Message-
> From: David Fisher [mailto:dfis...@jmlafferty.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:41 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>
> > I'm not sure what you meant by PIC OS, unless you meant the Pic
t haven't googled it
yet.
-Allen
> -Original Message-
> From: David Fisher [mailto:dfis...@jmlafferty.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 5:41 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>
> >> PL/1 was a nice break from exte
>> PL/1 was a nice break from extending FORTRAN IV with BAL (Assembler).
>>
>> Wow real pointers and character strings!
>>
>> I seem to recall there was a version on the Prime minicomputers - IRC
>> they had a version of the PIC OS.
>>
>> Primos came out of the Boston area, was a son of Multics
I think you are completely lost, none of the big 5 could bill below 200$/hr
and survive paying the big building and the big bosses, 100$/hr is what the
sub-contractors are billing them. I did work for one of these in the 90's
and they already billed between 200-300$/hr at that time, this is 20 year
ontenu fourni.
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:51:42 -0500
> From: jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Fisher [mailto:dfis...@jmlafferty.com]
> > Sent
> -Original Message-
> From: David Fisher [mailto:dfis...@jmlafferty.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 3:28 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
>
> PL/1 was a nice break from extending FORTRAN IV with BAL (Assembler).
>
PL/1 was a nice break from extending FORTRAN IV with BAL (Assembler).
Wow real pointers and character strings!
I seem to recall there was a version on the Prime minicomputers - IRC they had
a version of the PIC OS.
Primos came out of the Boston area, was a son of Multics and a brother OS to
Un
mcat Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: [OT] RE: Tomcat Consultant
PL/1, boy that brings back memories.
I worked for years on a mini-computer who's O/S was written using a
combination of a PL/1 subset and machine code. Really nice, Unix-like O/S,
that ha
PL/1, boy that brings back memories.
I worked for years on a mini-computer who's O/S was written using a combination
of a PL/1 subset and machine code. Really nice, Unix-like O/S, that had Unix
beat in some areas, lacked behind it in others. Really kind of miss it these
days.
However, I don't
20 matches
Mail list logo
