On 11.07.2013, at 17:36, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
You mention header/footers, which was in the back of my mind when I posted
this. Placing headers/footers in WEB-INF doesn't allow me to re-use these
in different webapps, without having multiple
On 15/07/2013 10:38, Rainer Frey wrote:
On 11.07.2013, at 17:36, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
You mention header/footers, which was in the back of my mind when
I posted this. Placing headers/footers in WEB-INF doesn't allow
me to re-use these in
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
I'd prefer to see a clearer requirement for it from the user base
What about a single site with multiple webapps all laid out with the same
header/footer, left/right navigation styles ? - all
On 15/07/2013 15:38, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
-Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
[mailto:ma...@apache.org] Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
I'd prefer to see a clearer requirement for it from the user base
What about a single site with multiple webapps all laid out with the
same
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
...I'd encourage you to grab the 8.0.x source, built it and try out the new
resource handling. Feedback welcome.
From here?
http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/docs/building.html
On 15/07/2013 17:17, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
...I'd encourage you to grab the 8.0.x source, built it and try out the new
resource handling. Feedback welcome.
From here?
http
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:46 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
On 15/07/2013 17:17, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org
On 15/07/2013 20:09, Andrew Kujtan wrote:
When you say resource handling are you referring to serving files from
within a jars' META-INF/resource folder?
Yes, and more. See the Tomcat docs from the CI system for details:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/docs/config/resources.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 7/11/13 11:36 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
-Original Message- From: Tim Funk
[mailto:funk...@apache.org] Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
Its a best practice to keep your jsp's inside of WEB-INF.
Since WEB
Its a best practice to keep your jsp's inside of WEB-INF. Since WEB-INF/ is
not allowed to be requested by the browser - its a simple enforcement
mechanism to prevent users from direct access to calling jsps. (Since it
may be common to have jsp's as snippets for header / footers etc -- and
there
-Original Message-
From: Tim Funk [mailto:funk...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
Its a best practice to keep your jsp's inside of WEB-INF. Since WEB-INF/ is not
allowed to be requested by the browser - its a simple enforcement
mechanism to prevent users from direct access
Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Funk [mailto:funk...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: [OT] WEB-INF
Its a best practice to keep your jsp's inside of WEB-INF. Since WEB-INF/ is not
allowed to be requested by the browser - its a simple enforcement
mechanism to prevent
When did it start that developers decided to place jsps in the WEB-INF
directory? Was that intended from the beginning, or was it stumbled upon?
Leo
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 15:08 -0700, Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
When did it start that developers decided to place jsps in the WEB-INF
directory? Was that intended from the beginning, or was it stumbled
upon?
My guess is that it was a side effect of MVC adoption -- making views
accessible
14 matches
Mail list logo