If you want to learn never hesitate to ask a question no mater how dumb it
is .
As long as owners of this forum have no problem with my question , i will
continue to ask .I dont have to listen to you.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Hassan Schroeder
hassan.schroe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun,
On 08/04/2014 09:39, Vicky B wrote:
If you want to learn never hesitate to ask a question no mater how dumb it
is .
As long as owners of this forum have no problem with my question , i will
continue to ask .I dont have to listen to you.
No, you don't have to listen to the advice you have been
On 4/7/2014 12:24 AM, Vicky B wrote:
*May I suggest Reading The Fine Manual for your particular firewallwould
be preferable to asking random non-psychic strangers?*
The question i asked was generic one every firewall have some common
fucntionality .
That is true, but the question you asked
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Vicky B vickyb2...@gmail.com wrote:
The question i asked was generic one every firewall have some common
fucntionality .
For someone who previously had no clue that firewall would drop
the connection you assert that with a great deal of certainty.
In any case,
*May I suggest Reading The Fine Manual for your particular firewallwould
be preferable to asking random non-psychic strangers?*
The question i asked was generic one every firewall have some common
fucntionality .
I hope you have control on your tongue next time you reply.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014
HI All,
The problem is solved now . we are have implemented a callback
functionality where after every 45 seconds we call back the same method
again .Hence making sure that there is no timeout.
But as per identifying the actual reason behind the problem i tried to
reproduce the issue,after
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Vicky B vickyb2...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is solved now .
Erm, well. Perhaps for some definition of solved...
I had no clue that firewall would drop the connection if it does not
recieve response within stiplulated time.
Can i increase this timeout
Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. [mailto:smithh032...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: timeout
- and if that is not the reason, then find the person responsible for
the
in-between equipment
On Mar 31, 2014 3:48 AM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. [mailto:smithh032...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: timeout
- and if that is not the
there is a firewall between browser and apache httpd and i am not sure if
there is a firewall between apache and tomcat (mostly no).
But why would this firewall drop the connection ?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2014 3:48 AM,
Vicky B wrote:
there is a firewall between browser and apache httpd and i am not sure if
there is a firewall between apache and tomcat (mostly no).
But why would this firewall drop the connection ?
Some people never learn..
Sigh.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
André Warnier wrote:
Vicky B wrote:
there is a firewall between browser and apache httpd and i am not sure if
there is a firewall between apache and tomcat (mostly no).
But why would this firewall drop the connection ?
Some people never learn..
Sigh.
Ok, Vicky, one last try from me :
1)
On 3/31/2014 4:18 AM, Vicky B wrote:
there is a firewall between browser and apache httpd and i am not sure if
there is a firewall between apache and tomcat (mostly no).
Mostly? Mostly? As in sometimes there's a firewall, and other times
there's not, but mostly not?
Or do you mean that
13 matches
Mail list logo
