On 5/1/20, 5:07 PM, "André Warnier (tomcat/perl)" wrote:
I think you may have gotten everyone confused now because
1) you cannot have 2 different tomcat installations under the same
directory (/opt/tomcat in your above explanation)
I've used this style of parallel insta
On Fri, May 1, 2020, 13:32 Darryl Philip Baker <
darryl.ba...@northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Continuing the investigation:
>
> I have the two tomcat installation in /opt/tomcat.
I assume /opt/tomcat is the BASE subdirectory path, where two different
versions are installed under that named BASE. so
On 01.05.2020 20:32, Darryl Philip Baker wrote:
Continuing the investigation:
I have the two tomcat installation in /opt/tomcat. Apache HTTPD references the worker file using a
path that has a symbolic link that "latest" I can switch to point to either installation
of tomcat. The workers file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Darryl,
On 5/1/20 14:32, Darryl Philip Baker wrote:
> Continuing the investigation:
>
> I have the two tomcat installation in /opt/tomcat. Apache HTTPD
references the worker file using a path that has a symbolic link that
"latest" I can switch to po
Continuing the investigation:
I have the two tomcat installation in /opt/tomcat. Apache HTTPD references the
worker file using a path that has a symbolic link that "latest" I can switch to
point to either installation of tomcat. The workers file is defined in
httpd.conf as "JkWorkersFile /opt/t
On 01.05.2020 00:09, Darryl Philip Baker wrote:
I am trying to browse to one of the JKmount URLs in this case
https://myserver.northwestern.edu/LmsSync/. When I point the symbolic link to
the 9.0.20 installation, it works fine. When I point the symbolic link to the
9.0.34 installation, it I ge
I am trying to browse to one of the JKmount URLs in this case
https://myserver.northwestern.edu/LmsSync/. When I point the symbolic link to
the 9.0.20 installation, it works fine. When I point the symbolic link to the
9.0.34 installation, it I get a 404 error.
Darryl Baker, GSEC (he/him/his)
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Darryl,
On 4/30/20 07:59, Darryl Philip Baker wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade a development environment from 9.0.20 to
> 9.0.34 and I am having issues getting the tomcat-connectors-1.2.46
> (mod_jk) to work in with the new version.
Can you be more
Shawn Beard
Sr. Systems Engineer
BTS
+1-515-564-2528
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Philip Baker
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Upgrading from 9.0.20 to 9.0.34 AJP connector issue [EXTERNAL]
** CAUTION: Ex
col. I'm pretty sure it’s the tomcatAuthentication you need to remove.
Shawn Beard
Sr. Systems Engineer
BTS
+1-515-564-2528
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Philip Baker
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Upgrading from 9.0.20 to 9.0.34 AJP
I am trying to upgrade a development environment from 9.0.20 to 9.0.34 and I am
having issues getting the tomcat-connectors-1.2.46 (mod_jk) to work in with the
new version. The Apache HTTPD configuration remains unchanged the paths pass
through a symbolic link I change to switch versions. The wo
a
va
>
>
:274)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
> org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector.startInternal(Connector.java:1
05
>
>
5)
>>>>> ... 12 more
>>>>>
>>>>> This new "secretRequired" attribute prevents the To
m of the message and start typing instead of
typing at the top :)
- -chris
> -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 11:40
> AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: AJP Connector
> issue
>
> RK,
>
> On 3/20/20 09:57, RK
t; Gecko) Chrome/80.0.3987.149 Safari/537.36 Edg/80.0.361.69"
> >>>
> >>> - "" [20/Mar/2020:10:56:24 +0100] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1"
> >>> 403
> 885 "
> >> https://dev-fordatis.fraunhofer.de/"; "Mozilla/5.0
e: AW: AW: AJP Connector issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
RK,
On 3/20/20 09:57, RK Ashburn wrote:
> I have tested r successful AJP connector with apache proxy on (tomcat
> 7)
>
> 1. For AJP connector adding secretRequired="false" and
address="0.0
not mandatory but optional. So that
>> I can run the newest
Tomcat
>> without this attribute which I do now with the pre-Ghostcat
>> releases.
>>
>> Have a nice weekend Florian Fritze
>>
>> -- Florian Fritze M.A. Fraunhofer-Informationszentrum Raum und
er (tomcat/perl)
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. März 2020 13:34
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AJP Connector issue
Ok, so it looks like :
- the request is effectively reaching tomcat, and that it is tomcat sending
back the 403 response.
- the URL is "/", so presumably it is "we
--
> Florian Fritze M.A.
> Fraunhofer-Informationszentrum Raum und Bau IRB
> Competence Center Research Services & Open Science
> Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
> Telefon +49 711 970-2713
> florian.fri...@irb.fraunhofer.de | www.irb.fraunhofer.de
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nac
; Open Science
Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Telefon +49 711 970-2713
florian.fri...@irb.fraunhofer.de | www.irb.fraunhofer.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: André Warnier (tomcat/perl)
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. März 2020 13:34
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AJ
Telefon +49 711 970-2713
florian.fri...@irb.fraunhofer.de | www.irb.fraunhofer.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: André Warnier (tomcat/perl)
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. März 2020 10:14
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AJP Connector issue
On 20.03.2020 08:23, Fritze, Florian wr
nhofer.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: André Warnier (tomcat/perl)
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. März 2020 10:14
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AJP Connector issue
On 20.03.2020 08:23, Fritze, Florian wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> thanks for the reply. Maybe I am doing
.fraunhofer.de | www.irb.fraunhofer.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christopher Schultz
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. März 2020 20:14
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AJP Connector issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Florian,
On 3/19/20 07:43, Fritze, Florian wro
ltz
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. März 2020 20:14
An: users@tomcat.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AJP Connector issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Florian,
On 3/19/20 07:43, Fritze, Florian wrote:
> since the Tomcat release with the Ghostcat security fix (Tomcat
> 8.5.51) me as an ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 3/19/20 10:57, André Warnier (tomcat/perl) wrote:
> For example : - if all your pairs of httpd server/tomcat server are
> running on the same host, then you do not really have a security
> issue, and adding a secret will not really bring a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Florian,
On 3/19/20 07:43, Fritze, Florian wrote:
> since the Tomcat release with the Ghostcat security fix (Tomcat
> 8.5.51) me as an admin have the problem using the
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy_ajp.html module to
> connect th
On 19.03.2020 12:43, Fritze, Florian wrote:
Dear Tomcat users,
since the Tomcat release with the Ghostcat security fix (Tomcat 8.5.51) me as an admin
have the problem using the https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy_ajp.html module
to connect the Apache HTTPD with the Tomcat running o
Dear Tomcat users,
since the Tomcat release with the Ghostcat security fix (Tomcat 8.5.51) me
as an admin have the problem using the
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy_ajp.html module to connect
the Apache HTTPD with the Tomcat running on localhost. The attribute
secretRequired mus
Can anyone throw more light on this issue? We are being plagued by this
problem and the only way we can resolve this is by HUP'ing the thread.
- Shekar
On 12/19/06, Shekar Tippur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rainer,
One another change we noticed was that response is cut off for a
particular tra
Rainer,
One another change we noticed was that response is cut off for a particular
transaction on a thread. For every other thread, we see marshelling and
un-marshelling messages in the mod_jk.log file.
There is no issue of load
[Fri Dec 08 01:16:25 2006] [18477:] [debug]
ajp_connection_t
Rainer,
We upgraded mod_jk to 1.2.19 and we are still getting the same error in
mod_jk.
[Tue Dec 19 11:35:36 2006] [31691:] [warn]
ajp_get_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (2258): Unable to get the free endpoint
for worker myWorker from 1 slots
[Tue Dec 19 11:35:36 2006] [31691:] [info]
ajp_get
Hello,
Thanks for replying back.
I cannot see any specal requests but there maybe high load. I can see 193
active threads.
We are in the process of upgrading mod_jk version to 1.2.19.
Here is some of the information you wanted. Please let me know if you need
more information.
cat /proc/versio
Hi,
this looks strange. Could you please post your config and give a couple
of details about your environment (OS+Version). Is there any pattern
related to the problem (special requests, high load, ...)?
It would be really good, if you could update mod_jk to 1.2.19 or 1.2.20
which will most likel
Hello
We are getting unable to get the free endpoint and eventually resulting
in a 500 (internal server error).
We are using apache 1.3.37 and mod_jk version is 1.2.15. Due to many
reasons,
we are not in a position to upgrade wither of these packages.
[Fri Dec 08 01:34:09 2006] [18477:] [wa
33 matches
Mail list logo
