TC 3.3.x had an optional module to do this. It never got ported.
I generally agree with most of the people that say that this is the least of
your problems. If you are usings a self-signed cert, then you are just
getting what you deserve. Otherwise, you simply contact the CA and revoke
the
On 6/2/06, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TC 3.3.x had an optional module to do this. It never got ported.
I generally agree with most of the people that say that this is the least of
your problems. If you are usings a self-signed cert, then you are just
getting what you deserve.
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
On 6/2/06, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TC 3.3.x had an optional module to do this. It never got ported.
I generally agree with most of the people that say that this is the
least of
your problems. If you are usings a self-signed cert, then you are just
Robert Harper wrote:
One thing to think of is that if you have to do that to protect it, then
everything else on that system is suspect.
Yeah, yeah. I used to use this argument a lot, too. But that's like
saying: if your harness isn't secure, then why bother with an additional
safety net
Shankar Unni wrote:
Robert Harper wrote:
One thing to think of is that if you have to do that to protect it, then
everything else on that system is suspect.
Yeah, yeah. I used to use this argument a lot, too. But that's like
saying: if your harness isn't secure, then why bother with an
